MPO Policy and Procedures Manual - Indianapolis Metropolitan ...
MPO Policy and Procedures Manual - Indianapolis Metropolitan ... MPO Policy and Procedures Manual - Indianapolis Metropolitan ...
1 B. Existing Roadway Capacity Improvement (100 points possible) Circle appropriate CRITERION MEASURES SCORE FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Principal Arterial 15 Minor Arterial 10 Collector 5 2 EXISTING OPERATIONS (Level of Service - LOS) LOS = F 25 LOS = E 15 LOS = D 8 LOS = C or higher 0 3 FUTURE OPERATIONS (Year 2035 Level of Service Without Project) LOS = F 25 LOS = E 15 4 EXISTING AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME * (Average of Corridor Segments) ADT x .0005 Maximum of 25 points _____ 5 PERMANENT NEIGHBORHOOD DISRUPTION / RELOCATION * No acquisition of residential or 10 business structures No knowledge 0 Requires acquisition of residential or business -5 structures TOTAL POINTS for EXISTING ROADWAY CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT * Documentation is required to substantiate the scores; particularly those criteria identified by an asterisk (*) 106 VALUES CAPTURED 1. Roadway Hierarchy 2. Existing Congestion Level 3. Future Congestion/Need 4. Motorists Served/System Function 5. Impact/Ease of Construction
C. New Roadway Construction (100 points possible) Circle 1 appropriate CRITERION MEASURES SCORE PROJECTED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME * (Average of Segments for Corridors) in 2035 ADT x .0008 Maximum of 40 points _____ 2 PROJECT IS REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT YES 25 3 PROJECT ENABLES CONNECTIVITY / CONTINUITY OF THE CORRIDOR YES 25 4 PERMANENT NEIGHBORHOOD DISRUPTION / RELOCATION * No acquisition of residential or business structures 10 No knowledge 0 Requires acquisition of residential or business structures -5 TOTAL POINTS for NEW ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT * Documentation is required to substantiate the scores; particularly those criteria identified by an asterisk (*) VALUES CAPTURED 1. Motorists Served/System Function 2. Regional Context 3. Network Role 4. Impact/Ease of Construction 107
- Page 60 and 61: 56 (this page intentionally left bl
- Page 62 and 63: 58 developed to fund local programs
- Page 64 and 65: 60 (this page intentionally left bl
- Page 66 and 67: BACKGROUND Federal legislation requ
- Page 68 and 69: D. Provision of pertinent certifica
- Page 70 and 71: 1. Each local public agency within
- Page 72 and 73: V. OFFICERS 68 i. The Chair of the
- Page 74 and 75: B. The Chair and voting members (or
- Page 76 and 77: Unified Planning Work Program 1. Th
- Page 78 and 79: 74 (this page intentionally left bl
- Page 80 and 81: 76 • making information available
- Page 82 and 83: Policy 3.2 Those plans and programs
- Page 84 and 85: MPO website http://www.indympo.org/
- Page 86 and 87: Contact Those seeking more informat
- Page 88 and 89: APPENDIX D TITLE VI COMPLAINT PROCE
- Page 90 and 91: III. Responsible Official The overa
- Page 92 and 93: • If the allegations are not subs
- Page 94 and 95: APPENDIX E INDIANAPOLIS MPO TRANSPO
- Page 96 and 97: 92 • All applications that do not
- Page 98 and 99: CONTACT INFORMATION Comments or que
- Page 100 and 101: 96 (this page intentionally left bl
- Page 102 and 103: Introduction The Indianapolis Metro
- Page 104 and 105: • telework/telecommuting programs
- Page 106 and 107: APPENDIX: CONGESTION MITIGATION & A
- Page 108 and 109: 8. Transit Service Expansion Projec
- Page 112 and 113: D. Roadway Reconstruction/Rehabilit
- Page 114 and 115: F. Bridge Replacement (100 points p
- Page 116 and 117: H. Intersection or Intersection Gro
- Page 118 and 119: J. Pedestrian Enhancement (100 poin
- Page 120: L. Transit Enhancement Capital Proj
C. New Roadway Construction (100 points possible) Circle<br />
1<br />
appropriate<br />
CRITERION MEASURES SCORE<br />
PROJECTED AVERAGE DAILY<br />
TRAFFIC VOLUME * (Average of<br />
Segments for Corridors) in 2035<br />
ADT x .0008<br />
Maximum<br />
of 40 points<br />
_____<br />
2<br />
PROJECT IS REGIONALLY<br />
SIGNIFICANT<br />
YES 25<br />
3<br />
PROJECT ENABLES CONNECTIVITY /<br />
CONTINUITY OF THE CORRIDOR<br />
YES 25<br />
4<br />
PERMANENT NEIGHBORHOOD<br />
DISRUPTION / RELOCATION *<br />
No acquisition of residential or<br />
business structures<br />
10<br />
No knowledge 0<br />
Requires acquisition of<br />
residential or business<br />
structures<br />
-5<br />
TOTAL POINTS for NEW ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT<br />
* Documentation is required to substantiate the scores; particularly those criteria<br />
identified by an asterisk (*)<br />
VALUES CAPTURED<br />
1. Motorists Served/System Function<br />
2. Regional Context<br />
3. Network Role<br />
4. Impact/Ease of Construction<br />
107
Change language