MPO Policy and Procedures Manual - Indianapolis Metropolitan ...
MPO Policy and Procedures Manual - Indianapolis Metropolitan ... MPO Policy and Procedures Manual - Indianapolis Metropolitan ...
8. Transit Service Expansion Projects: Projects which link an Environmental Justice (EJ) community or communities with job, medical, shopping recreation and education centers. (1 Point) Points will be awarded to qualifying projects. IV. Project Readiness (30 Point Maximum) Maximum points (30) will be awarded if the applicant demonstrates a commitment to obligate funds prior to ___ ___, 20__. All other applicants will receive zero points. To receive these points, the applicant’s project implementation schedule must demonstrate a clear intent and commitment to have obligated all allocated CMAQ funds prior to _____ _____, 20__. Applicants who represent that they will have their CMAQ funds obligated by ____ ____, 20__, but fail to do so, will have their projects cancelled. V. Partnerships (5 Points) Points will be awarded if project implementation involves multiple parties. Application must contain evidence of each party’s commitment to the project. VI. Local Match (5 Points) Five (5) points will be awarded to projects that provide a local share that exceeds the minimum required of 20%. VII. Required Prioritizations (No Points) Required Prioritization of Transit Service Expansion Projects: Projects providing bus feeder service to commuter rail stations must be prioritized over other transit service expansion projects. Community Bicycle Plan: Bicycle-related projects must be supported by a community-based bicycle plan, adopted in the same manner as the community’s comprehensive plan or plans (or included therein). Such projects should not generally be funded where such plans do not exist. Highway Construction Projects: Sidewalks are required along at least one side of each funded highway improvement project – unless compelling evidence to the contrary is submitted. 104
APPENDIX G PROJECT PRIORITY WORKSHEET FOR STP FUNDS IRTIP GROUP I URBAN STP - PROJECT PRIORITY WORKSHEET A. New Signalization (100 points possible) Circle appropriate CRITERION MEASURES SCORE 1 NEW SIGNAL WARRANTS as defined in the Indiana Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) * 3 or more Warrants Met 70 2 Warrants Met 55 1 Warrant Met 35 2 FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION (leg of intersection with highest classification) Principal Arterial 15 Minor Arterial 10 Collector 5 3 SIGNAL COORDINATION / INTERCONNECTION Included in Project 15 TOTAL POINTS for NEW SIGNALIZATION PROJECT * Documentation is required to substantiate the scores; particularly those criteria identified by an asterisk (*) VALUES CAPTURED 1. Propensity of Need 2. Roadway Hierarchy 3. Improved Corridor Efficiency 105
- Page 58 and 59: 54 that it feels is unsupportable o
- Page 60 and 61: 56 (this page intentionally left bl
- Page 62 and 63: 58 developed to fund local programs
- Page 64 and 65: 60 (this page intentionally left bl
- Page 66 and 67: BACKGROUND Federal legislation requ
- Page 68 and 69: D. Provision of pertinent certifica
- Page 70 and 71: 1. Each local public agency within
- Page 72 and 73: V. OFFICERS 68 i. The Chair of the
- Page 74 and 75: B. The Chair and voting members (or
- Page 76 and 77: Unified Planning Work Program 1. Th
- Page 78 and 79: 74 (this page intentionally left bl
- Page 80 and 81: 76 • making information available
- Page 82 and 83: Policy 3.2 Those plans and programs
- Page 84 and 85: MPO website http://www.indympo.org/
- Page 86 and 87: Contact Those seeking more informat
- Page 88 and 89: APPENDIX D TITLE VI COMPLAINT PROCE
- Page 90 and 91: III. Responsible Official The overa
- Page 92 and 93: • If the allegations are not subs
- Page 94 and 95: APPENDIX E INDIANAPOLIS MPO TRANSPO
- Page 96 and 97: 92 • All applications that do not
- Page 98 and 99: CONTACT INFORMATION Comments or que
- Page 100 and 101: 96 (this page intentionally left bl
- Page 102 and 103: Introduction The Indianapolis Metro
- Page 104 and 105: • telework/telecommuting programs
- Page 106 and 107: APPENDIX: CONGESTION MITIGATION & A
- Page 110 and 111: 1 B. Existing Roadway Capacity Impr
- Page 112 and 113: D. Roadway Reconstruction/Rehabilit
- Page 114 and 115: F. Bridge Replacement (100 points p
- Page 116 and 117: H. Intersection or Intersection Gro
- Page 118 and 119: J. Pedestrian Enhancement (100 poin
- Page 120: L. Transit Enhancement Capital Proj
APPENDIX G<br />
PROJECT PRIORITY WORKSHEET FOR STP FUNDS<br />
IRTIP GROUP I URBAN STP - PROJECT PRIORITY WORKSHEET<br />
A. New Signalization (100 points possible) Circle<br />
appropriate<br />
CRITERION MEASURES SCORE<br />
1 NEW SIGNAL WARRANTS<br />
as defined in the Indiana <strong>Manual</strong> on<br />
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)<br />
*<br />
3 or more Warrants Met 70<br />
2 Warrants Met 55<br />
1 Warrant Met 35<br />
2 FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL<br />
CLASSIFICATION (leg of<br />
intersection with highest classification)<br />
Principal Arterial 15<br />
Minor Arterial 10<br />
Collector 5<br />
3<br />
SIGNAL COORDINATION /<br />
INTERCONNECTION<br />
Included in Project 15<br />
TOTAL POINTS for NEW SIGNALIZATION PROJECT<br />
* Documentation is required to substantiate the scores; particularly those criteria<br />
identified by an asterisk (*)<br />
VALUES CAPTURED<br />
1. Propensity of Need<br />
2. Roadway Hierarchy<br />
3. Improved Corridor Efficiency<br />
105
Change language