30.06.2015 Views

West Penn Power AMENDED Program Year 3 Final Annual Report

West Penn Power AMENDED Program Year 3 Final Annual Report

West Penn Power AMENDED Program Year 3 Final Annual Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 8-4: PY3 Joint Utility Usage Management <strong>Program</strong> (JUUMP) Summary of Evaluation Results for<br />

Demand<br />

Stratum<br />

JUUMP<br />

program<br />

<strong>Report</strong>ed Gross<br />

Demand Reduction<br />

Demand<br />

Realization Rate<br />

Observed<br />

Coefficient of<br />

Variation (CJ or<br />

Proportion<br />

Relative Precision<br />

Verified Gross<br />

Demand<br />

Reduction<br />

0.08 93.0% 0.4 0.11 0.07<br />

<strong>Program</strong> Total 0.08 93.0% 0.4 0.111 0.07<br />

8.3 Impact Evaluation Net Savings<br />

Act 129 compliance is based on gross savings, but the Company's Evaluators are presently finalizing a<br />

portfolio-level net to gross survey to inform the program planning for Phase II of Act 129. The<br />

evaluation of the legacy FirstEnergy companies included net-to-gross research based on <strong>Program</strong> <strong>Year</strong> 3<br />

(PY3) participants. Given the mid-year transition of <strong>West</strong> <strong>Penn</strong> <strong>Power</strong> programs to FirstEnergy's model,<br />

<strong>West</strong> <strong>Penn</strong> <strong>Power</strong> specific net-to-gross research was not conducted. The evaluation team plans to<br />

complete net-to-gross research on <strong>West</strong> <strong>Penn</strong> <strong>Power</strong> program participants starting in February 2013 and<br />

based on six months of PY4 participants. These results will be available in time to inform the final plans<br />

for Phase II. The Net-to-Gross data acquisition will be based on participant self-report surveys and will<br />

follow a similar approach as that used for the FirstEnergy legacy companies.<br />

8.4 Process Evaluation<br />

Tetra Tech conducted a telephone survey of customers who participated in the program in PY3 quarter 1<br />

and quarter 2. The objective was to:<br />

• Learn about the installation and use of measures<br />

• Learn about experiences and satisfaction with participating in the program<br />

• Understand their level of interaction with the auditors, what was learned, and actions taken as a<br />

result of the experience<br />

Methodology<br />

Tetra Tech randomly sampled the 104 JUUMP participants with the aim of completing surveys with<br />

about 50 percent of the population.<br />

Kev Findings<br />

The audits are providing participants with new energy saving information and, as a result, customers are<br />

acting on some of those'recommendations. With the exception of those that reside in multifamily<br />

buildings, most respondents recalled an auditor coming to their home and discussing ways to save<br />

energy. Auditors, on average, spent a little over an hour with customers. This time, includes the 30<br />

<strong>West</strong> <strong>Penn</strong> <strong>Power</strong> Company | Page 61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!