Curse of Cannan - The New Ensign

scene is worthy of a turgid drama in ancient Rome, perhaps to be set to music by Verdi; an aging
aristocrat resolves to leave his estate to his compliant catamite, and is promptly poisoned by an
angry relative. Somehow, one is not surprised to find that the principal actor in this sweaty drama
is also the acknowledged founder of the legal profession in America.
Edmund Randolph made another appearance to defend a noted criminal; after he had delayed
government action against Edmond Genet, Genet was finally deported. The plot to set up a rival
republic in Louisiana was then taken over by the Masonic leaders Edward Livingston and Aaron
Burr. Burr was finally brought to trial for treason in sensational proceedings which were
conducted in Richmond, Virginia. Here again, the Masons brought in their former Grand Master,
Edmund Randolph, to defend Burr. Not surprisingly, the sitting judge was Chief Justice John
Marshall, who was at that time Grand Master of the Lodge of Virginia. Burr was acquitted.
Indeed to have convicted him, one would have needed the strength to defy the entire Masonic
Canaanite conspiracy in the United States. No such person appeared.
The amazing acquittal of Burr by his Masonic fellow-conspirators has been repeated thousands
of times in the Virginia courts. Stephen King reports in "The Brotherhood" that in England, from
fifty to seventy per cent of all judges are Masons, and that ninety per cent of the members of the
Laws Society (corresponding to our Bar Association) are Masons. The legal system in the United
States, from all appearances, has an even higher preponderance of Masons. Thus we have no
federal, state, or local courts; we have only Masonic courts. The result is that judicial decisions
on Rules of Evidence, motions for or against discovery, and other legal procedures, are decided
solely on the basis of whether they will aid or injure a Mason involved in the suit. The Masonic
Handbook commands (p. 183-184): "Whenever you see any of our signs made by a brother
Mason, and especially the grand hailing sign of distress, you must always be sure to obey them,
even at the risk of your own life. If you are on a jury, and the defendant is a Mason, and makes
the grand hailing sign, you must obey it; you must disagree with your brother jurors, if necessary,
but you must be sure not to bring the Mason in as guilty, for that would bring disgrace upon our
order."
It was for these reasons that Congressman Thaddeus Stevens sponsored a resolution demanding
that Freemasonry be suppressed, denouncing it as "a secret, oath-bound, murderous institution
that endangers the continuance of Republican government," and further demanded that being a
Mason would be cause for peremptory challenge in court, and made it unlawful for a Mason to
sit as judge in a trial involving another Mason. For years, thousands of Americans have been
puzzled by the odd decisions rendered in our courts. They do not know what has taken place;
the victims of these injustices have no way of knowing that they have been subjected to the arrant
assumptions of an Oriental despotism masquerading under color of law; that no justice can be
administered if the Judge has taken an oath under penalty of death to always rule in favor of a
brother Mason. But, asks the doubter, what if both parties in a lawsuit are Masons, and the judge
is a Mason what then? In that case, my friend, the case will be judged on its merits. However, if
a non-Mason is a party to the suit, he is bound to lose.
The Handbook continues: "You must conceal all crimes of your brother Masons..., except murder
and treason, and these only at your own option, and should you be summoned as a witness against
a brother Mason, be always sure to shield him. Prevaricate, don't tell the truth in this case, keep
his secrets, forget the important parts. It may be perjury to do this, it is true, but you are keeping
your obligations."
This writer knows of cases where a Mason was called into a case to commit perjury against his
own brother, in order to defend a fellow Mason. This writer has been involved in many lawsuits
in which subornation of perjury by Masonic lawyers was the order of the day; altered records,
legal documents which the clerks of the court denied ever receiving even though they had been
personally handed to them, judges who do not bother to even read the motions filed by a
non-Mason, and important documents supporting his charges which are stolen from his home,
including copies of checks, receipts, and other vital papers. The Will of Canaan instructs these
( Page 94)