Architecture Program Report Tulane University New Orleans ...
Architecture Program Report Tulane University New Orleans ... Architecture Program Report Tulane University New Orleans ...
3.5. Studio Culture Policy Tulane architectural studios seek a culture of intellectual diversity, and a positive and respectful learning environment. What is exceedingly important, however, is to provide an explanatory Studio Culture Policy to the students. This document provides them with the intellectual tools to understand, and therefore benefit from, the culture of the studio environment. The values that Tulane finds appropriate are those that encourage students to learn from positive criticism, and to benefit from the environment as a whole. In both directions (faculty to student, student to faculty) respect is a watchword. Because of their studio environment, students from the School of Architecture are themselves highly respected among peers and faculty alike across the University—what we as faculty believe is a result of their studio experience. Students are provided with a Studio Culture Policy at the beginning of First-Year Studio, a policy that is reiterated at the beginning of each successive year. The document has several sections, which are as follows: —Criticism and the role of the faculty in design studio —Critique formats and the expectations of both students and faculty —A general outline of respect for others, in particular as student and faculty alike both maintain differences as a result of diverse experiences and value formation. —This section also speaks to time management, that is, what is an appropriate ‘matrix’ for both faculty and students to follow. —Finally, there is an outline of expectations that the student should fulfill, articulated in practical, intellectual, and ‘spiritual’ terms, as in following the ‘spirit of the philosophy’ of design studio teaching and learning. However, a representative student group has been working on a Studio Culture Policy for submission to the faculty for discussion purposes. The ‘sum’ of the two will become the slated, and formalized, Studio Culture Policy. Please see section 4.2 of this APR for both the Studio Culture
Policy Faculty—DRAFT and the Student Studio Culture Policy —DRAFT, as they are articulated for students and faculty.
- Page 41 and 42: 6. Program Self-Assessment [NAAB VT
- Page 43 and 44: apidly and radically changed design
- Page 45 and 46: world through which students pass t
- Page 47 and 48: levels as well. Given the quality o
- Page 49 and 50: 2. 1. SUMMARY OF RESPONSES TO TEAM
- Page 51 and 52: eliminated, replaced by a return to
- Page 53 and 54: of book abstracts, articles and pro
- Page 55 and 56: Physical Facilities Another primary
- Page 57 and 58: Per the first concern, that of Comp
- Page 59 and 60: A significant positive aspect of th
- Page 61 and 62: 3.1. PROGRAM RESPONSE TO NAAB PERSP
- Page 63 and 64: Tulane University is justly proud o
- Page 65 and 66: ody is itself diverse; along with u
- Page 67 and 68: engage architecture and design on a
- Page 69 and 70: PROGRAM SELF-ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES
- Page 71 and 72: Tulane Renewal Plan, a response to
- Page 73 and 74: FACULTY POLICY ON PROMOTION AND TEN
- Page 75 and 76: Professional accomplishment Traditi
- Page 78 and 79: Promotion to Professor Recommendati
- Page 80 and 81: conducting the review for continuat
- Page 82 and 83: Because the thesis year is situated
- Page 84 and 85: depth. New directions and initiativ
- Page 86 and 87: PUBLIC INFORMATION
- Page 88 and 89: SOCIAL EQUITY
- Page 90 and 91: Mirroring the proactive strategies
- Page 94 and 95: HUMAN RESOURCES
- Page 96 and 97: ecently. It should be noted that th
- Page 98 and 99: FACULTY AREA(S) of EXPERTISE Profes
- Page 100 and 101: *See also current draft of Tenure a
- Page 102 and 103: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF Scott Bernhard
- Page 104 and 105: necessary equipment, the monitoring
- Page 106 and 107: HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
- Page 108 and 109: In addition to a full academic prog
- Page 110 and 111: Academic - The Tulane City Center w
- Page 112 and 113: y the School of Architecture in 200
- Page 114 and 115: A wide range of academic scholarshi
- Page 116 and 117: Students serve in various elected b
- Page 118 and 119: options available in Athens or Rome
- Page 120 and 121: Recently, the University developed
- Page 122 and 123: 2004 Greg Lynn 2003 Eric Owen Moss
- Page 124 and 125: . TSA ARCHIVE In 2006, Clare Olsen,
- Page 126 and 127: RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL Designed i
- Page 128 and 129: Further information regarding the c
- Page 130 and 131: INFORMATION RESOURCES 3. 9. INFORMA
- Page 132 and 133: In addition to books and serial pub
- Page 134 and 135: distribute digitized images from th
- Page 136 and 137: Computer Resources available to Stu
- Page 138 and 139: The University's ten libraries toge
- Page 140 and 141: NEW ORLEANS RESEARCH LIBRARIES and
3.5. Studio Culture Policy<br />
<strong>Tulane</strong> architectural studios seek a culture of intellectual diversity,<br />
and a positive and respectful learning environment. What is<br />
exceedingly important, however, is to provide an explanatory<br />
Studio Culture Policy to the students. This document provides<br />
them with the intellectual tools to understand, and therefore benefit<br />
from, the culture of the studio environment.<br />
The values that <strong>Tulane</strong> finds appropriate are those that encourage<br />
students to learn from positive criticism, and to benefit from the<br />
environment as a whole. In both directions (faculty to student,<br />
student to faculty) respect is a watchword. Because of their studio<br />
environment, students from the School of <strong>Architecture</strong> are<br />
themselves highly respected among peers and faculty alike across<br />
the <strong>University</strong>—what we as faculty believe is a result of their studio<br />
experience.<br />
Students are provided with a Studio Culture Policy at the beginning<br />
of First-Year Studio, a policy that is reiterated at the beginning of<br />
each successive year. The document has several sections, which<br />
are as follows:<br />
—Criticism and the role of the faculty in design studio<br />
—Critique formats and the expectations of both students and<br />
faculty<br />
—A general outline of respect for others, in particular as student<br />
and faculty alike both maintain differences as a result of diverse<br />
experiences and value formation.<br />
—This section also speaks to time management, that is, what is an<br />
appropriate ‘matrix’ for both faculty and students to follow.<br />
—Finally, there is an outline of expectations that the student should<br />
fulfill, articulated in practical, intellectual, and ‘spiritual’ terms, as in<br />
following the ‘spirit of the philosophy’ of design studio teaching and<br />
learning.<br />
However, a representative student group has been working on<br />
a Studio Culture Policy for submission to the faculty for<br />
discussion purposes. The ‘sum’ of the two will become the<br />
slated, and formalized, Studio Culture Policy.<br />
Please see section 4.2 of this APR for both the Studio Culture