Architecture Program Report Tulane University New Orleans ...
Architecture Program Report Tulane University New Orleans ... Architecture Program Report Tulane University New Orleans ...
SOCIAL EQUITY
3. 4. SOCIAL EQUITY Tulane University and the School of Architecture are committed to the achievement of equality and diversity in all aspects of the institution. Tulane is an Affirmative Action/Equal Employment Opportunity institution, and consequently its policy of non-discrimination includes recruitment, employment, retention, and promotion of the most qualified students, faculty and staff, regardless of an individual's race, sex, color, religion, national/ethnic origin, age, citizenship, marital status, sexual orientation, handicap or veteran status. Tulane University does not discriminate in its provisions of services and benefits and in its treatment of students, patients and employees. The School of Architecture actively fosters an atmosphere of candor and communication. Students serve on school committees and are represented at faculty meetings. In addition, there are all-school meetings at the beginning of each semester at which time the floor is opened for comment. Other venues for all-school discussion occur in monthly all-school meetings, whereby student concerns and comments are solicited and information regarding the program, upcoming events, among other information is disseminated. During the past two years, the School of Architecture has undertaken a protracted self-assessment of its curriculum. In addition, the constitution acts to ensure that all parties to the School are represented. A standard policy for all promotion, reappointment and tenure cases for both tenure/ tenure-track faculty and Professors in Practice has been written and adopted by the faculty. In every case, faculty input has been elicited, acknowledged and discussed at some length. Much of this input has been incorporated into the final documents. Under the constitution, faculty, staff, and students are represented at faculty meetings and on the various governance committees of the school. The ongoing retreats serve to provide a mechanism in which the School entertains voices of advocacy, concern and dissent. As shown in the NAAB Statistical Report (see Appendix), the current makeup of the student body enrolled in the professional program (First- through Fifth-Year, 85% of our student population) is approximately 53% female and 47% male. The percentage of minority students is approximately 15% (4% Afro-American, 5% Asian/Pacific Isle, 5% Hispanic), though the number of Hispanic students is clearly underrepresented, as many no longer specify their ethnic origin as such. In point of fact, students of any minority are no longer required by the University and the School of Architecture to designate their minority status. The makeup of the faculty (part-time and full-time) is approximately 33% female and 66% male, a significant improvement over the 17% female/83% male ratios tabled in a previous accreditation report (1994). TSA has two minority faculty members. The graduate program is smaller, but similar in percentages and diversity to the undergraduate program.
- Page 37 and 38: Establishing "standards without sta
- Page 39 and 40: highest level. In the United States
- Page 41 and 42: 6. Program Self-Assessment [NAAB VT
- Page 43 and 44: apidly and radically changed design
- Page 45 and 46: world through which students pass t
- Page 47 and 48: levels as well. Given the quality o
- Page 49 and 50: 2. 1. SUMMARY OF RESPONSES TO TEAM
- Page 51 and 52: eliminated, replaced by a return to
- Page 53 and 54: of book abstracts, articles and pro
- Page 55 and 56: Physical Facilities Another primary
- Page 57 and 58: Per the first concern, that of Comp
- Page 59 and 60: A significant positive aspect of th
- Page 61 and 62: 3.1. PROGRAM RESPONSE TO NAAB PERSP
- Page 63 and 64: Tulane University is justly proud o
- Page 65 and 66: ody is itself diverse; along with u
- Page 67 and 68: engage architecture and design on a
- Page 69 and 70: PROGRAM SELF-ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES
- Page 71 and 72: Tulane Renewal Plan, a response to
- Page 73 and 74: FACULTY POLICY ON PROMOTION AND TEN
- Page 75 and 76: Professional accomplishment Traditi
- Page 78 and 79: Promotion to Professor Recommendati
- Page 80 and 81: conducting the review for continuat
- Page 82 and 83: Because the thesis year is situated
- Page 84 and 85: depth. New directions and initiativ
- Page 86 and 87: PUBLIC INFORMATION
- Page 90 and 91: Mirroring the proactive strategies
- Page 92 and 93: 3.5. Studio Culture Policy Tulane a
- Page 94 and 95: HUMAN RESOURCES
- Page 96 and 97: ecently. It should be noted that th
- Page 98 and 99: FACULTY AREA(S) of EXPERTISE Profes
- Page 100 and 101: *See also current draft of Tenure a
- Page 102 and 103: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF Scott Bernhard
- Page 104 and 105: necessary equipment, the monitoring
- Page 106 and 107: HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
- Page 108 and 109: In addition to a full academic prog
- Page 110 and 111: Academic - The Tulane City Center w
- Page 112 and 113: y the School of Architecture in 200
- Page 114 and 115: A wide range of academic scholarshi
- Page 116 and 117: Students serve in various elected b
- Page 118 and 119: options available in Athens or Rome
- Page 120 and 121: Recently, the University developed
- Page 122 and 123: 2004 Greg Lynn 2003 Eric Owen Moss
- Page 124 and 125: . TSA ARCHIVE In 2006, Clare Olsen,
- Page 126 and 127: RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL Designed i
- Page 128 and 129: Further information regarding the c
- Page 130 and 131: INFORMATION RESOURCES 3. 9. INFORMA
- Page 132 and 133: In addition to books and serial pub
- Page 134 and 135: distribute digitized images from th
- Page 136 and 137: Computer Resources available to Stu
SOCIAL EQUITY