Architecture Program Report Tulane University New Orleans ...
Architecture Program Report Tulane University New Orleans ... Architecture Program Report Tulane University New Orleans ...
As a part of the preparation for their final thesis projects, students will also take an advanced level seminar in history/theory, technology, urban design or digital media concurrent with thesis research. The topics of these advanced classes will support the focus areas of thesis, research and integrated studios offered in each year. Qualified students are expected to undertake the initial research and preliminary design studies for a Thesis proposition - that is, a generalizable set of ideas not limited to a specific site or program – that will subsequently be further explored in the Spring Semester through the medium of an architectural project of some theoretical, programmatic or formal complexity. While the work may be based upon a specific site (or sites) and program, it requires an explicit theoretical grounding, an understood position in relation to current discourse, and a sense of its own broader implications in order to qualify as a Thesis. The ideas that constitute the Thesis should be understandable as applicable to other sites and programs. The ultimate products of the year's working process will be drawings, models and other means of architectural representation. The Thesis Project may pursue a proposition that has the scope and scale of a single building; of specific spaces in buildings; of urban design; or of constructed landscape interventions. For the completion of 510, each student produces a substantial document consisting of a thesis precis, thorough documentation of the student’s individual research, the comprehensive development of an architectural program and site analysis, a proposed methodological framework consistent with the thesis research to guide the design process, and an annotated bibliography. The Instructors must be convinced by the student’s submissions that (a) they are proposing a topic worthy of pursuit as a Thesis and (b) that they are demonstrating the understanding and capabilities necessary to pursue this topic. Without these, proposals will not be allowed to proceed, and 510 must be passed before 520 can be entered. The pursuit of a Thesis therefore must be seen as something to be achieved rather than a general expectation or burden. Work is evaluated on the student's success in fulfilling the general objectives of the course and the specific objectives of the assignment; quality of writing, graphics and presentation are part of the basis of evaluation. Intellectual rigor and critical judgment are expected in each student's work. The second semester of Thesis year (DSGN 520) commences the design, detail development, and full presentation and documentation of the final thesis project. The work of the course proceeds primarily by the further development of the Thesis, based on the work undertaken in the fall-semester Thesis Research course, now through the medium of design. Instructors respond to and advise on the work through desk critiques and discussion in pinup sessions. Students are expected to pursue their chosen Thesis - that is, a generalizable set of ideas not limited to a specific site or program –through the vehicle of an architectural project of some theoretical, programmatic or formal complexity. While the work may be based upon a specific site (or sites) and program, it requires an explicit theoretical grounding, an understood position in relation to current discourse, and a sense of its own broader implications in order to qualify as a Thesis. The ideas that constitute the Thesis should be understandable as applicable to other sites and programs. The ultimate products of the year's working process will be drawings, models and other means of architectural representation. The Thesis
Project may pursue a proposition that has the scope and scale of a single building; of specific spaces in buildings; of urban design; or of constructed landscape interventions. A high degree of initiative and independent motivation is expected of the student in the conduct of the work. In all of the curricular streams for the final project, independence and responsibility are encouraged and supported by the thesis instructor, a faculty member available in regular studio sessions. A welldisciplined and consistently productive work ethic is essential, as are effective time management and realistic production objectives. Students are expected to take up the opportunity presented by the Studio to integrate knowledge and skills gained in their other mandatory courses, studios and, where appropriate, their electives. Design work is assessed in three major stages, marked by formal reviews. Between those reviews occur intermediate pinups within the Studio sections. Public presentation and a juried review of the thesis projects at the end of the second semester allow for the assessment of student accomplishments, both individually and collectively.
- Page 128 and 129: Further information regarding the c
- Page 130 and 131: INFORMATION RESOURCES 3. 9. INFORMA
- Page 132 and 133: In addition to books and serial pub
- Page 134 and 135: distribute digitized images from th
- Page 136 and 137: Computer Resources available to Stu
- Page 138 and 139: The University's ten libraries toge
- Page 140 and 141: NEW ORLEANS RESEARCH LIBRARIES and
- Page 142 and 143: drawings, documents, and photograph
- Page 144 and 145: 3. 10. FINANCIAL RESOURCES AND INST
- Page 146 and 147: ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE
- Page 148 and 149: The School of Architecture The admi
- Page 150 and 151: the Faculty and Staff. Provides ass
- Page 152 and 153: Comparison to Other Professional De
- Page 154 and 155: 3. 12. PROFESSIONAL DEGREES AND CUR
- Page 156 and 157: particularly in the second and thir
- Page 158 and 159: University Elective (Cultural Knowl
- Page 160 and 161: School's distribution of electives
- Page 162 and 163: Certificate in Preservation Studies
- Page 164 and 165: Advanced Technology Elective 3 Arch
- Page 166 and 167: 6 E l e c t i v e 3 E l e c t i v e
- Page 168 and 169: Studio in Building Preservation 6 H
- Page 170 and 171: Because the University is concerned
- Page 172 and 173: PREAMBLE As an aid to the Accredita
- Page 174 and 175: discipline and practice. Second-yea
- Page 176 and 177: ut directs design. In essence, the
- Page 180 and 181: 1. Speaking and Writing Skills Abil
- Page 182 and 183: and critical thinking. While not re
- Page 184 and 185: to the idea of programming and the
- Page 186 and 187: spatial principles, as well as the
- Page 188 and 189: 110 during the year) focus intermit
- Page 190 and 191: As has been noted in the section
- Page 192 and 193: esearch and intermittent courses on
- Page 194 and 195: Technological Systems II (ATCS 310)
- Page 196 and 197: core design sequence (DSGN 110 thro
- Page 198 and 199: uilding systems integration also ex
- Page 200 and 201: studio course: a Professional Conce
- Page 202 and 203: 34. Ethics and Professional Judgmen
- Page 204 and 205: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION" DESCRIPTI
- Page 206 and 207: Special Student Students aged twent
- Page 208 and 209: August). In each subsequent semeste
- Page 210 and 211: PRIVATE ACADEMIC POLICIEStc \l 5 "A
- Page 212 and 213: of the Student Grievance Procedures
- Page 214 and 215: ecorded. The student may re-enroll
- Page 216 and 217: the time of withdrawal. Withdrawal
- Page 219 and 220: 4.2. STUDIO CULTURE POLICY
- Page 221 and 222: The Studio culture fosters intellec
- Page 223 and 224: [Student Studio Culture Policy—DR
- Page 225 and 226: proper time management. One of the
- Page 227 and 228: considered an “outreach charrette
As a part of the preparation for their final thesis projects, students will also take<br />
an advanced level seminar in history/theory, technology, urban design or digital<br />
media concurrent with thesis research. The topics of these advanced classes will<br />
support the focus areas of thesis, research and integrated studios offered in each<br />
year.<br />
Qualified students are expected to undertake the initial research and preliminary<br />
design studies for a Thesis proposition - that is, a generalizable set of ideas not<br />
limited to a specific site or program – that will subsequently be further explored in<br />
the Spring Semester through the medium of an architectural project of some<br />
theoretical, programmatic or formal complexity. While the work may be based<br />
upon a specific site (or sites) and program, it requires an explicit theoretical<br />
grounding, an understood position in relation to current discourse, and a sense of<br />
its own broader implications in order to qualify as a Thesis. The ideas that<br />
constitute the Thesis should be understandable as applicable to other sites and<br />
programs. The ultimate products of the year's working process will be drawings,<br />
models and other means of architectural representation. The Thesis Project may<br />
pursue a proposition that has the scope and scale of a single building; of specific<br />
spaces in buildings; of urban design; or of constructed landscape interventions.<br />
For the completion of 510, each student produces a substantial document<br />
consisting of a thesis precis, thorough documentation of the student’s individual<br />
research, the<br />
comprehensive development of an architectural program and site analysis, a<br />
proposed methodological framework consistent with the thesis research to guide<br />
the design process, and an annotated bibliography. The Instructors must be<br />
convinced by the student’s submissions that (a) they are proposing a topic<br />
worthy of pursuit as a Thesis and (b) that they are demonstrating the<br />
understanding and capabilities necessary to pursue this topic. Without these,<br />
proposals will not be allowed to proceed, and 510 must be passed before 520<br />
can be entered. The pursuit of a Thesis therefore must be seen as something to<br />
be achieved rather than a general expectation or burden.<br />
Work is evaluated on the student's success in fulfilling the general objectives of<br />
the course and the specific objectives of the assignment; quality of writing,<br />
graphics and presentation are part of the basis of evaluation. Intellectual rigor<br />
and critical judgment are expected in each student's work.<br />
The second semester of Thesis year (DSGN 520) commences the design, detail<br />
development, and full presentation and documentation of the final thesis project.<br />
The work of the course proceeds primarily by the further development of the<br />
Thesis, based on the work undertaken in the fall-semester Thesis Research<br />
course, now through the medium of design. Instructors respond to and advise on<br />
the work through desk critiques and discussion in pinup sessions. Students are<br />
expected to pursue their chosen Thesis - that is, a generalizable set of ideas not<br />
limited to a specific site or program –through the vehicle of an architectural<br />
project of some theoretical, programmatic or formal complexity. While the work<br />
may be based upon a specific site (or sites) and program, it requires an explicit<br />
theoretical grounding, an understood position in relation to current discourse, and<br />
a sense of its own broader implications in order to qualify as a Thesis. The ideas<br />
that constitute the Thesis should be understandable as applicable to other sites<br />
and programs. The ultimate products of the year's working process will be<br />
drawings, models and other means of architectural representation. The Thesis