24.06.2015 Views

COMP9414: Artificial Intelligence Knowledge Representation ... - Sorry

COMP9414: Artificial Intelligence Knowledge Representation ... - Sorry

COMP9414: Artificial Intelligence Knowledge Representation ... - Sorry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>COMP9414</strong>, Wednesday 6 April, 2005 <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Representation</strong> and Reasoning 12<br />

<strong>COMP9414</strong>, Wednesday 6 April, 2005 <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Representation</strong> and Reasoning 14<br />

Semantics<br />

Terminology<br />

The semantics of the connectives can be given by truth tables<br />

P Q ¬P P ∧ Q P ∨ Q P → Q P ↔ Q<br />

True True False True True True True<br />

True False False False True False False<br />

False True True False True True False<br />

False False True False False True True<br />

One row for each possible assignment of True/False to propositional<br />

variables<br />

A sentence is valid if it is True under all possible assignments of<br />

True/False to its propositional variables (e.g. P ∨ ¬P)<br />

Valid sentences are also referred to as tautologies<br />

A sentence is satisfiable if and only if there is some assignment of<br />

True/False to its propositional variables for which the sentence is<br />

True<br />

A sentence is unsatisfiable if and only if it is not satisfiable (e.g.<br />

P ∧ ¬P)<br />

Important: Above P and Q can be any sentence, including complex<br />

sentences<br />

<strong>COMP9414</strong> c○UNSW, 2005 Generated: 7 April 2005<br />

<strong>COMP9414</strong> c○UNSW, 2005 Generated: 7 April 2005<br />

<strong>COMP9414</strong>, Wednesday 6 April, 2005 <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Representation</strong> and Reasoning 13<br />

<strong>COMP9414</strong>, Wednesday 6 April, 2005 <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Representation</strong> and Reasoning 15<br />

Semantics — Complex Sentences<br />

Material Implication<br />

R S ¬R R ∧ S ¬R ∨ S (R ∧ S) → (¬R ∨ S)<br />

True True False True True True<br />

True False False False False True<br />

False True True False True True<br />

False False True False True True<br />

The only time P → Q evaluates to False is when P is True and Q is<br />

False (i.e. P → Q is equivalent to ¬P ∨ Q)<br />

This is known as material implication<br />

English usage often suggests a causal connection between antecedent<br />

(P) and consequent (Q) – this is not reflected in the truth table<br />

So (P ∧ ¬P) → anything is a tautology!<br />

<strong>COMP9414</strong> c○UNSW, 2005 Generated: 7 April 2005<br />

<strong>COMP9414</strong> c○UNSW, 2005 Generated: 7 April 2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!