23.06.2015 Views

Investigation of the Onset Voltage for the Design of a ... - IEEE Xplore

Investigation of the Onset Voltage for the Design of a ... - IEEE Xplore

Investigation of the Onset Voltage for the Design of a ... - IEEE Xplore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 <strong>IEEE</strong>/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 11, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2006<br />

<strong>Investigation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Onset</strong> <strong>Voltage</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Micr<strong>of</strong>abricated Colloid Thruster<br />

Jijun Xiong, Dong Sun, Member, <strong>IEEE</strong>, Zhaoying Zhou, Senior Member, <strong>IEEE</strong>, and Wendong Zhang, Member, <strong>IEEE</strong><br />

Abstract—<strong>Onset</strong> voltage plays a crucial role in <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> a<br />

microcolloid thruster. This paper presents a methodology to estimate<br />

<strong>the</strong> onset voltage <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> a new micr<strong>of</strong>abricated<br />

colloid thruster. The basic idea <strong>of</strong> this method is to simplify <strong>the</strong><br />

source emitter and <strong>the</strong> extractor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microthruster as two hyperboloids<br />

<strong>of</strong> two sheets <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> equal potential surfaces. The<br />

maximum electric field between electrodes is modeled using <strong>the</strong><br />

Lamé method, on which a method to estimate <strong>the</strong> onset voltage is<br />

developed. To avoid <strong>the</strong> aberration <strong>of</strong> electric field caused by protuberances<br />

on <strong>the</strong> surface <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter, <strong>the</strong> height <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

source emitter must be much greater than that <strong>of</strong> protuberance.<br />

Experiments conducted on <strong>the</strong> homemade microcolloid thrusters,<br />

designed based on <strong>the</strong> proposed onset voltage estimation, verify <strong>the</strong><br />

correctness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> approach.<br />

Index Terms—Colloid thruster, electric field, micr<strong>of</strong>abrication,<br />

onset voltage.<br />

I. INTRODUCTION<br />

COLLOID thruster was firstly proposed and studied in<br />

1960s [1], [2], with a working principle <strong>of</strong> electrospraying<br />

[3]–[5]. A colloid thruster consists <strong>of</strong> a source emitter and an<br />

extractor, between which a high voltage is applied (Fig. 1). The<br />

minimum applied voltage to start <strong>the</strong> electrospraying is called<br />

<strong>the</strong> onset voltage <strong>of</strong> a colloid thruster. Due to high efficiency<br />

and high specific impulse ability, <strong>the</strong> colloid thruster appears to<br />

be an alternative to <strong>the</strong> conventional ion engine [2]. However,<br />

<strong>the</strong> thrust produced by <strong>the</strong> colloid thruster was not high enough<br />

to meet <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> propulsions <strong>for</strong> spacecrafts in <strong>the</strong> past. Ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

drawback <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colloid thruster is that <strong>the</strong> onset voltage,<br />

with a typical value <strong>of</strong> 10 kV, was so high that serious packaging<br />

problems might be caused [2], [6]. As a result, <strong>the</strong> application<br />

<strong>of</strong> colloid thruster has not obtained considerable interest in <strong>the</strong><br />

past.<br />

Motivated by micropropulsion <strong>of</strong> microspacecrafts, <strong>the</strong> microcolloid<br />

thruster has attracted increasingly more attention in<br />

recent years, <strong>for</strong> reasons <strong>of</strong> lower cost, smaller risk in launch,<br />

and ability <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>mation flight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microspacecraft [7]–[11]. A<br />

significant requirement <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> micropulsion system lies in <strong>the</strong><br />

Manuscript received March 24, 2003; revised February 10, 2005.<br />

Recommended by Technical Editor K. Ohnishi. Recommended by Technical<br />

Editor K. Ohnishi. This work was supported in part by a grant from <strong>the</strong> Research<br />

Grants Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong<br />

Kong, China (Reference CityU 1124/03E).<br />

J. Xiong and W. Zhang are with <strong>the</strong> Key Laboratory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> State Education<br />

Ministry on Instrumentation Science and Dynamic Measurement, North University<br />

<strong>of</strong> China, Shan’xi, China (e-mail: xiongjj@263.net; wdzhang@nuc.edu.cn).<br />

D. Sun is with <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Manufacturing Engineering and Engineering<br />

Management, City University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong (e-mail:<br />

medsun@cityu.edu.hk).<br />

Z. Zhou is with <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Precision Instruments and Mechanology,<br />

Tsinghua University, Beijing, China (e-mail: zhouzy@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn).<br />

Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TMECH.2005.859843<br />

Fig. 1.<br />

Basic principle <strong>of</strong> colloid thruster.<br />

attitude control [12]–[15], in which <strong>the</strong> produced thrust must<br />

be so small that it is in <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> micrometer-Newton, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> specific impulse should be in <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> hundreds <strong>of</strong> seconds<br />

[7], [12]. The micro colloid thruster can meet <strong>the</strong>se needs.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> modern micr<strong>of</strong>abrication technique, <strong>the</strong> onset<br />

voltage required by a microcolloid thruster can now be reduced<br />

significantly. O<strong>the</strong>r advantages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microcolloid thruster include<br />

high efficiency <strong>of</strong> energy conversion and control flexibility.<br />

As a result, <strong>the</strong> microcolloid propulsion system has been<br />

regarded as <strong>the</strong> most suitable system among all microelectric<br />

primary propulsion systems <strong>for</strong> microspacecraft propulsion applications<br />

[9].<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r research on <strong>the</strong> microcolloid thruster was motivated<br />

by advances in electrospray science, which has been driven by<br />

mass spectrometry in recent years [6], [16]–[18]. Taylor [19]<br />

predicted that <strong>the</strong> semiangle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cone was 49.3 ◦ . Mora<br />

and Loscertales [20] proposed <strong>the</strong> spraying current law <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Taylor cone, which was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical foundations <strong>for</strong><br />

designing colloid thrusters. Jaworek and Krupa [18] clarified<br />

<strong>the</strong> electrospray into dripping, spindle, oscillating, jet, precession,<br />

and cone-jet modes. Hartman et al. [21], [22] proposed a<br />

global hydrodynamic model to predict <strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> electrospray.<br />

Although progress has been made, detailed mechanics <strong>of</strong><br />

electrospray and <strong>the</strong> mechanics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colloid thruster are still<br />

far from being well understood.<br />

Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology makes<br />

<strong>the</strong> micromation and per<strong>for</strong>mance improvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colloid<br />

thruster possible [23], [24]. An array with thousands <strong>of</strong> emitters<br />

can now be fabricated in a silicon wafer by a micr<strong>of</strong>abrication<br />

process [25], [26]. The size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> emitter can be in <strong>the</strong> order<br />

<strong>of</strong> micrometer. The extremely small size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microcolloid<br />

thruster is also helpful in decreasing <strong>the</strong> onset voltage, which<br />

is verified in Section II. Both micromation and low operating<br />

voltage are urgently demanded by <strong>the</strong> microcolloid propulsion<br />

system [7]. A colloid thruster prototype with 100 nozzles was developed<br />

in [4] and [10]. This small colloid thruster, however, was<br />

1083-4435/$20.00 © 2006 <strong>IEEE</strong>


XIONG et al.: INVESTIGATION OF THE ONSET VOLTAGE FOR THE DESIGN OF A MICROFABRICATED COLLOID THRUSTER 67<br />

Fig. 2.<br />

Typical shape <strong>of</strong> conventional colloid thrusters.<br />

Fig. 4.<br />

Electrostatic field <strong>of</strong> electrodes <strong>of</strong> microthruster.<br />

microthruster are regarded as two hyperboloids <strong>of</strong> two sheets<br />

<strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> equal potential surfaces. The maximum electric field<br />

between electrodes is derived by Lamé method, based on which<br />

a method to estimate <strong>the</strong> onset voltage is proposed. The condition<br />

to eliminate <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> protuberances produced in micr<strong>of</strong>abrication<br />

is also discussed in this paper. Four microthrusters<br />

are designed according to <strong>the</strong> onset voltage estimation. Testing<br />

results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se thrusters show that <strong>the</strong> proposed onset voltage<br />

estimation works effectively.<br />

Fig. 3.<br />

Surface <strong>of</strong> silicon after ICP etching.<br />

not based on <strong>the</strong> micr<strong>of</strong>abrication. Fur<strong>the</strong>r work on microcolloid<br />

thruster array was per<strong>for</strong>med by Fernando. 1 Paine [27] designed<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r addressable microcolloid thruster array, in which a minimum<br />

thrust <strong>of</strong> 0.1 µmN was expected.<br />

It is noted that <strong>the</strong> fabrication process <strong>of</strong> a microcolloid<br />

thruster is largely different than that <strong>of</strong> a conventional thruster.<br />

To obtain <strong>the</strong> high electric field, <strong>the</strong> source emitter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> conventional<br />

colloid thruster usually employs a tapered tip [1], [2],<br />

as shown in Fig. 2. However, it is difficult to fabricate <strong>the</strong> tapered<br />

source emitter in <strong>the</strong> micr<strong>of</strong>abrication process. A typical shape<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> micr<strong>of</strong>abricated source emitter looks like a hollowed<br />

cylinder with dimensions in <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> tens <strong>of</strong> micrometer,<br />

<strong>for</strong>med by deep dry etching on <strong>the</strong> silicon such as inductively<br />

coupled plasma (ICP) or deep reactive ion etching. Due to <strong>the</strong><br />

long-time deep dry etching, many protuberances exist on <strong>the</strong><br />

surface <strong>of</strong> silicon. Fig. 3 shows <strong>the</strong> surface <strong>of</strong> silicon at 40 min<br />

after ICP etching, from which 2-µm-high protuberances can be<br />

found. These protuberances may result in a serious coarseness<br />

problem.<br />

To solve problems <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electrode shape and coarseness, we<br />

need to reconsider <strong>the</strong> electric field distribution between electrodes<br />

and <strong>the</strong> onset voltage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microcolloid thruster. This<br />

paper presents a new method <strong>for</strong> estimating <strong>the</strong> onset voltage<br />

through analyzing <strong>the</strong> surface tension stress and <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> electric field at <strong>the</strong> tip <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microcolloid<br />

thruster. The source emitter and <strong>the</strong> extractor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

1 Online. Available: http://web.mit.edu/aeroastro/www/labs/SPL/Research/<br />

colloid.htm<br />

II. ONSET VOLTAGE ESTIMATION<br />

The onset voltage is estimated based on <strong>the</strong> balance between<br />

<strong>the</strong> surface tension and <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electrostatic field on <strong>the</strong><br />

surface <strong>of</strong> droplet at <strong>the</strong> tip <strong>of</strong> source emitter <strong>of</strong> a microcolloid<br />

thruster. In this section, <strong>the</strong> electrostatic field between <strong>the</strong> source<br />

emitter and <strong>the</strong> extractor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microcolloid thruster, as well as<br />

an estimation <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> onset voltage estimation, are discussed.<br />

A. Electrostatic Field Distribution<br />

The potential between electrodes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microcolloid thruster,<br />

denoted by V, can be described in a cylindrical coordinate frame<br />

[30],i.e.,<br />

1<br />

r<br />

∂<br />

∂r<br />

(<br />

r ∂V )<br />

+ 1 ∂ 2 V<br />

∂r r 2 ∂θ 2<br />

+ ∂2 V<br />

=0 (1)<br />

∂z2 where r, θ, and z are three basic coordinates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cylindrical<br />

coordinate system. The boundary conditions <strong>of</strong> (1) are<br />

V = V 0 (r = r 1 ,z =0)<br />

V =0 (R 1 ≤ r ≤ R 2 ,z = d + r)<br />

where r 1 is <strong>the</strong> inner radius <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter, R 1 is <strong>the</strong> outer<br />

radius <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extractor, R 2 is <strong>the</strong> inner radius <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extractor,<br />

d is <strong>the</strong> distance between two electrodes, and V 0 is <strong>the</strong> applied<br />

voltage between two electrodes. Fig. 4 illustrates <strong>the</strong> electrostatic<br />

field <strong>of</strong> electrodes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microthruster, where <strong>the</strong> origin<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> inertia coordinate frame o-xyz is located in <strong>the</strong> center<br />

top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cylinder. The droplet is supposed to be a cone with<br />

height <strong>of</strong> 2r 1 . To enhance electric field in <strong>the</strong> z direction, d ≫ r 1<br />

in <strong>the</strong> design.


68 <strong>IEEE</strong>/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 11, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2006<br />

The solution <strong>of</strong> (1) is [30]<br />

∞∑<br />

V =<br />

i=0<br />

A i J 0<br />

(<br />

x i<br />

r<br />

r 1<br />

)<br />

sh<br />

(<br />

x i<br />

z<br />

r 1<br />

)<br />

where J 0 (·) is <strong>the</strong> zero-order Bessel function, and coefficients<br />

A i can be determined by <strong>the</strong> boundary conditions. Note that <strong>the</strong><br />

coefficients A i are hard to determine exactly.<br />

Equation (2) is too complicated to be used <strong>for</strong> estimation <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> electric field distribution between electrodes. An approximate<br />

solution <strong>of</strong> (1) is developed here, based on <strong>the</strong> Lamé<br />

method .[29]–[31] In <strong>the</strong> inertia coordinate frame o-xyz, <strong>the</strong> following<br />

equation represents a set <strong>of</strong> hyperboloids <strong>of</strong> two sheets:<br />

x 2<br />

λ + y2<br />

λ −<br />

z2<br />

c 2 = −1 (3)<br />

− λ<br />

where c denotes <strong>the</strong> distance between <strong>the</strong> focal point and <strong>the</strong><br />

origin, λ is a variable, and λ


XIONG et al.: INVESTIGATION OF THE ONSET VOLTAGE FOR THE DESIGN OF A MICROFABRICATED COLLOID THRUSTER 69<br />

where δ denotes <strong>the</strong> surface tension coefficient <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> liquid<br />

cone. The electrostatic stress is<br />

P E = 1 2 ε 0E 2 (15)<br />

where ε 0 is <strong>the</strong> permittivity <strong>of</strong> vacuum. Suppose P E = P δ ,we<br />

<strong>the</strong>n have<br />

√<br />

δ<br />

E =2<br />

r 1 ε 0 tan(a) . (16)<br />

Substituting (16) into (11) yields <strong>the</strong> onset voltage<br />

√<br />

(<br />

1 √<br />

V 0 =<br />

δr1 ln 2+2 d ε 0 tan(a)<br />

r 1<br />

√ (<br />

− 2 d +1<br />

)(3+2 d ) )<br />

r 1 r 1<br />

(<br />

=0.312 × 10 6√ δr 1 ln 2+2 d r 1<br />

√ (<br />

− 2 d )(<br />

+1 3+2 d ) ) . (17)<br />

r 1 r 1<br />

Fig. 6.<br />

Meshing model <strong>of</strong> electrodes <strong>of</strong> microcolloid thruster.<br />

It can be seen from (17) that <strong>the</strong> onset voltage V 0 greatly<br />

depends on <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> radius r 1 , via a relationship <strong>of</strong> √ r 1<br />

in <strong>the</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> V 0 . [The variation <strong>of</strong> r 1 in ln(·) has little<br />

influence to V 0 .] A small value <strong>of</strong> r 1 results in a small value <strong>of</strong><br />

V 0 directly. In conventional colloid thrusters, <strong>the</strong> radius r 1 <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> source emitter is in <strong>the</strong> scale <strong>of</strong> millimeter, whereas in <strong>the</strong><br />

proposed MEMS-based thruster, <strong>the</strong> radius r 1 is in <strong>the</strong> scale <strong>of</strong><br />

micrometer. This is <strong>the</strong> main reason why <strong>the</strong> onset voltage <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> proposed microthruster can be reduced dramatically.<br />

III. SIMULATIONS AND DISCUSSIONS<br />

A. Simulations <strong>of</strong> Electric Field<br />

To verify <strong>the</strong> electric field in (11), a comparison between<br />

results obtained by (11) and results obtained by <strong>the</strong> finite element<br />

method was per<strong>for</strong>med in simulations. The meshing model used<br />

by <strong>the</strong> finite element method is shown in Fig. 6. The units <strong>of</strong> all<br />

length variables (e.g., d and r 1 ) are micrometers. The electric<br />

field between electrodes in <strong>the</strong> z direction has <strong>the</strong> maximum<br />

value at <strong>the</strong> tip <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter (as seen in Fig. 5), which<br />

has <strong>the</strong> great influence to <strong>the</strong> onset voltage. Fig. 7 illustrates<br />

<strong>the</strong> numerical solution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electric field by <strong>the</strong> finite element<br />

method, where R 1 =30µm, R 2 =50µm, R =15µm, d =<br />

420 µm, h =80µm, V = 2000 V, and h denotes <strong>the</strong> height <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> source emitter (see more details in Fig. 12). It is seen that <strong>the</strong><br />

maximum value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electric field between electrodes around<br />

<strong>the</strong> tip <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter ranges between 55.2 V/µm and<br />

55.7 V/µm. By (11), <strong>the</strong> maximum electric field was estimated<br />

to be 57.26 V/µm. The results obtained by <strong>the</strong> two methods are<br />

quite similar.<br />

The same analysis was fur<strong>the</strong>r per<strong>for</strong>med when electrodes<br />

have different sizes. Results are listed in Table I, where Ea denotes<br />

<strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> maximum electric field calculated by <strong>the</strong><br />

Fig. 7.<br />

Results obtained by finite element analysis.<br />

TABLE I<br />

MAXIMUM ELECTRIC FIELD BETWEEN ELECTRODES<br />

finite element method, and Es denotes <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> maximum<br />

electric field calculated by (11). It is seen that all values <strong>of</strong> Es<br />

are close to those <strong>of</strong> Ea, which indicates that <strong>the</strong> proposed simple<br />

electric field estimation is comparable to <strong>the</strong> finite element<br />

method. Note that <strong>the</strong> extractor is simplified as a plane when<br />

using (11), which enhances <strong>the</strong> electrical field <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source<br />

emitter. In <strong>the</strong> meshing model used by <strong>the</strong> finite element analysis,<br />

<strong>the</strong> extractor is a hollowed cylinder with <strong>the</strong> inner and outer<br />

radius. This is why Es is slightly larger than Ea in Table I.<br />

B. Influence <strong>of</strong> Aberration <strong>of</strong> Electric Field<br />

As mentioned in Section I and illustrated in Fig. 3, deep dry<br />

etch results in protuberances on <strong>the</strong> silicon surface. Heights <strong>of</strong>


70 <strong>IEEE</strong>/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 11, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2006<br />

TABLE II<br />

ESTIMATED ONSET VOLTAGES<br />

Fig. 8.<br />

Model <strong>of</strong> electrodes with protuberances.<br />

To eliminate <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aberration <strong>of</strong> electric field,<br />

<strong>the</strong> height <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter should be more than 75 µm.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, we conclude that when (11) and (17) are used to<br />

design <strong>the</strong> microcolloid thruster, it is necessary to ensure <strong>the</strong><br />

height <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter is great enough compared with that<br />

<strong>of</strong> protuberances. O<strong>the</strong>rwise, <strong>the</strong> aberration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electric field<br />

caused by <strong>the</strong> protuberances has to be taken into account. Fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

analysis has been given when H P =1µm, R P =0.5 µm, and<br />

H P =0.5 µm, and R P =0.25 µm, and it was found that <strong>the</strong><br />

values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electric field stabilize around 55.5 V/µm at smaller<br />

values <strong>of</strong> h (i.e., 60 and 48 µm, respectively). It will be helpful<br />

to reduce <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aberration <strong>of</strong> electric field induced<br />

by protuberances, if micr<strong>of</strong>abrication is improved and <strong>the</strong> height<br />

<strong>of</strong> protuberance is decreased.<br />

Fig. 9.<br />

Electric field versus height <strong>of</strong> source emitter.<br />

protuberances are not identical and increase as <strong>the</strong> ICP etching<br />

time increases. Protuberances affect <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

electric field between electrodes, but this influence can be eliminated<br />

if <strong>the</strong> source emitter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microcolloid thruster is high<br />

enough. In <strong>the</strong> following, a finite element analysis model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

microthruster with protuberances is developed <strong>for</strong> investigation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong> aberration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electric field<br />

caused by protuberances and <strong>the</strong> height <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter.<br />

Fig. 8 illustrates <strong>the</strong> finite element model, in which <strong>the</strong> height<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> protuberance, denoted by H P ,is2µm, and <strong>the</strong> radius R P<br />

is 1 µm. The o<strong>the</strong>r parameters are R 1 =30µm, R 2 =50µm,<br />

r 1 =15µm, and d = 420 µm. For simplicity, only eight protuberances<br />

were considered in <strong>the</strong> model. These protuberances<br />

are identical in height and located in <strong>the</strong> axial symmetry<br />

positions.<br />

The relationship between <strong>the</strong> electrical field and <strong>the</strong> height<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter is shown in Fig. 9. It can be seen that<br />

<strong>the</strong> maximum value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electrical field between electrodes<br />

increases as <strong>the</strong> height <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter increases. When<br />

<strong>the</strong> height <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter is more than 75 µm, <strong>the</strong> value<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electric field stabilizes around 55.5 V/µm. In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong><br />

H P =2µm and R P =1µm, protuberances weaken <strong>the</strong> electric<br />

field obviously when <strong>the</strong> source emitter is shorter than 70 µm.<br />

C. <strong>Onset</strong> <strong>Voltage</strong> Estimation<br />

We now estimate <strong>the</strong> onset voltages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microcolloid<br />

thrusters listed in Table I by (17). The onset voltage relates to <strong>the</strong><br />

surface tension coefficient <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> propellant. When <strong>for</strong>mamide<br />

doped with 30% NaI in weight is used as <strong>the</strong> propellant, δ is<br />

about 0.058 N/m. Using <strong>the</strong> same parameters as in Table I, <strong>the</strong><br />

onset voltages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microthrusters were predicted and given<br />

in Table II, where <strong>the</strong> numbers 1–4 correspond to <strong>the</strong> numbers<br />

in Table I. The values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> onset voltage in Table II are significantly<br />

smaller than those <strong>of</strong> conventional colloid thrusters.<br />

The correctness <strong>of</strong> such estimation and <strong>the</strong> design followed is<br />

verified in <strong>the</strong> experiment in Section IV.<br />

IV. EXPERIMENTS<br />

To verify <strong>the</strong> correctness <strong>of</strong> (17), four microcolloid thrusters<br />

with <strong>the</strong> same parameters as given in Table I, were fabricated and<br />

used in <strong>the</strong> tests. The thrusters were fabricated by bulk silicon<br />

process.<br />

A. Fabrication<br />

The fabrication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microthruster includes fabrication <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> source emitter and <strong>the</strong> extractor, as shown in Figs. 10 and 11.<br />

The first step <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter fabrication process was that<br />

50% KOH etched <strong>the</strong> silicon wafer to create a square pyramidal<br />

pit. The etching depth was about 280 µm. SiO 2 /Si 3 N 4 was used<br />

as <strong>the</strong> mask. Second, <strong>the</strong> source emitter with a cylinder shape<br />

was built by ICP. Patterned photoresist mask was used <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

ICP to <strong>for</strong>m a round pit with 60 µm in depth. The outer wall <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> source emitter was <strong>for</strong>med by <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r ICP with aluminium<br />

layer as <strong>the</strong> mask, where <strong>the</strong> depth was 80 µm. Finally, <strong>the</strong> inner<br />

wall <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter was <strong>for</strong>med, where <strong>the</strong> depth was


XIONG et al.: INVESTIGATION OF THE ONSET VOLTAGE FOR THE DESIGN OF A MICROFABRICATED COLLOID THRUSTER 71<br />

Fig. 12.<br />

SEM photo <strong>of</strong> source emitter.<br />

Fig. 10.<br />

Fabrication process steps <strong>of</strong> source.<br />

Fig. 13.<br />

SEM photo <strong>of</strong> extractor.<br />

Fig. 11.<br />

Fabrication process steps <strong>of</strong> extractor.<br />

Fig. 14.<br />

Packaged microcolloid thruster.<br />

140 µm, which was enough to make ICP penetrate through <strong>the</strong><br />

silicon wafer.<br />

The fabrication process <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extractor was relatively simple.<br />

As shown in Fig. 11, <strong>the</strong> first step was similar to that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

source emitter, except that <strong>the</strong> etching depth was 360 µm. The<br />

following step was to <strong>for</strong>m <strong>the</strong> aluminium electrode, and <strong>the</strong>n<br />

ICP was used to penetrate through <strong>the</strong> silicon wafer and <strong>for</strong>m<br />

<strong>the</strong> exiting channel <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spraying droplet.<br />

Two scanning electron microscope (SEM) photos <strong>of</strong> a source<br />

emitter and an extractor are shown in Figs. 12 and 13, respectively.<br />

The height <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter is about 80 µm. In<br />

Fig. 12, <strong>the</strong> protuberances are about 2 µm in height and 1 µmin<br />

width. There is a glass spacer in <strong>the</strong> middle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter<br />

and <strong>the</strong> extractor. Epoxy was used to bond <strong>the</strong> structure. Fig. 14<br />

illustrates <strong>the</strong> photo <strong>of</strong> a packaged microcolloid thruster.


72 <strong>IEEE</strong>/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 11, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2006<br />

Fig. 15.<br />

Block diagram <strong>of</strong> test system.<br />

Fig. 17.<br />

Original output <strong>of</strong> displacement sensor (U =0V).<br />

Fig. 18.<br />

Output <strong>of</strong> displacement sensor after filtering (U = 1400 V).<br />

Fig. 16.<br />

Photo <strong>of</strong> test facility.<br />

TABLE III<br />

ONSET VOLTAGES IN TESTS.<br />

B. Tests<br />

Fig. 15 illustrates a testing structure used to verify <strong>the</strong> developed<br />

thruster. A cantilever beam with a thruster onboard was<br />

used as a sensor. When <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce produced by <strong>the</strong> thruster acts<br />

on <strong>the</strong> cantilever beam, <strong>the</strong> beam deflects. The deflection was<br />

measured by a current vortex displacement sensor, which could<br />

translate <strong>the</strong> displacement into an electrical signal with a sensitivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> 8 mV/µm. The electrical signal was recorded by an<br />

A/D converter. The sensing system was placed in a high vacuum<br />

box with 10 −5 torr air pressure. Fig. 16 illustrates a photo <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

testing system.<br />

The output <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> displacement sensor includes two parts:<br />

<strong>the</strong> displacement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cantilever beam caused by <strong>the</strong> external<br />

<strong>for</strong>ce, and <strong>the</strong> vibration superposed on that displacement.<br />

Because <strong>the</strong> displacement is so small that is in <strong>the</strong> scale <strong>of</strong><br />

micrometer, <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vibration to <strong>the</strong> output must be<br />

considered. The wave pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> free vibration is shown in<br />

Fig. 17, where <strong>the</strong> vibration amplitude is about several micrometers.<br />

Vibration analysis shows that <strong>the</strong> main components <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> vibration signal have frequencies <strong>of</strong> 1.95 and 13.67 Hz, respectively.<br />

To obtain <strong>the</strong> exact value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> displacement, <strong>the</strong><br />

output components with frequencies <strong>of</strong> 1.95 and 13.67 Hz were<br />

removed from <strong>the</strong> signal. After removing <strong>the</strong>se two components<br />

from Fig. 17, <strong>the</strong> displacement sensor appeared an output <strong>of</strong><br />

−3.12 V when <strong>the</strong> external <strong>for</strong>ce is zero.<br />

Experimental results show that <strong>the</strong> onset voltage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first<br />

microthruster is about 1260 V. When <strong>the</strong> applied voltage increases<br />

from 0 to 1300 V, <strong>the</strong> cantilever beam remains balanced,<br />

as shown in Fig. 17. When <strong>the</strong> applied voltage reached<br />

1300 V, <strong>the</strong> beam began to deflect. Removing components with<br />

<strong>the</strong> first- and <strong>the</strong> second-order natural frequencies from <strong>the</strong> signal,<br />

<strong>the</strong> output <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> displacement sensor is plotted in Fig. 18.<br />

Compared with <strong>the</strong> output <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> displacement sensor with zero<br />

input, <strong>the</strong>re is an <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>of</strong> about 0.49 V, which implies that <strong>the</strong><br />

electrospray begins.<br />

The tests were fur<strong>the</strong>r per<strong>for</strong>med on <strong>the</strong> remaining three microthrusters.<br />

All results are listed in Table III. It can be seen<br />

that <strong>the</strong> testing results in Table III basically agree with those<br />

predicted by (17) in Table II. The slight difference is explained<br />

as follows: 1) <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extractor is neglected when using<br />

(17); 2) <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> designed thruster is slightly different


XIONG et al.: INVESTIGATION OF THE ONSET VOLTAGE FOR THE DESIGN OF A MICROFABRICATED COLLOID THRUSTER 73<br />

from that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> actual one; and 3) <strong>the</strong>re is a “voltage loss” due<br />

to <strong>the</strong> interaction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> charged droplets [5].<br />

It is also verified in <strong>the</strong> test that <strong>the</strong> onset voltage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microcolloid<br />

thruster can be reduced dramatically compared with that<br />

<strong>of</strong> conventional colloid thrusters. In our test, <strong>the</strong> microcolloid<br />

thruster could work under 1300 V, whereas <strong>the</strong> working voltage<br />

<strong>of</strong> a conventional colloid thruster is usually at least 5000–<br />

10 000 V. The advantage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> low onset voltage required by<br />

our microcolloid thruster makes it easier to be integrated with<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r colloid system components.<br />

V. CONCLUSION<br />

This paper presents a new method to analyze <strong>the</strong> electric field<br />

distribution between <strong>the</strong> source emitter and <strong>the</strong> extractor, and<br />

an estimation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> onset voltage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microcolloid thruster.<br />

The basic idea is to regard two electrodes as two equal potential<br />

surfaces. To avoid <strong>the</strong> aberration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electric field caused by<br />

protuberances on <strong>the</strong> surface <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter, <strong>the</strong> height<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source emitter must be great enough compared with that<br />

<strong>of</strong> protuberances. Several microcolloid thrusters are designed<br />

and fabricated based on <strong>the</strong> proposed onset voltage estimation.<br />

Testing results show that <strong>the</strong> actual onset voltages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> newly<br />

designed thrusters match <strong>the</strong> estimated values. Meanwhile, it<br />

has been shown that <strong>the</strong> micromation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colloid thruster<br />

helps decrease <strong>the</strong> operating voltage dramatically.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] A. G. Bailey and J. E. Bracher, “Capillary-fed annular colloid thruster,”<br />

J. Spacecraft Rockets, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 518–524, 1972.<br />

[2] S. Zafran, J. C. Beynon, P. W. Kidd, H. Shelton, and F. A. Jackson, “Onemillipound<br />

colloid thruster system development,” J. Spacecraft Rockets,<br />

vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 531–533, 1973.<br />

[3] C. D. Hendricks, “Parametric studies <strong>of</strong> electrohydrodynamic spraying,”<br />

AIAA66-252, 1966.<br />

[4] P. Lozano and M. Martinez-Sanchez, “Experimental study <strong>of</strong> colloid<br />

plumes,” AIAA2001-3334, 2001.<br />

[5] M. Gamero-Castano and V. Hruby, “Electrospray as a source <strong>of</strong> nanoparticles<br />

<strong>for</strong> efficient colloid thrusters,” J. Propulsion Power, vol. 17, no. 5,<br />

pp. 977–987, 2001.<br />

[6] M. Martinez-Sanchez, J. F. de la Mora, H. M. Gamero-Castano, and<br />

V. Khayms, “Research on colloid thrusters,” presented at <strong>the</strong> 26th Int.<br />

Electric Propulsion Conf., Kitakyushu, Japan, 1999.<br />

[7] J. G. Reichbach, R. J. Sedwick, and M. Martinez-Sanchez, “Micropropulsion<br />

system selection <strong>for</strong> precision <strong>for</strong>mation flying satellites,”<br />

AIAA2001-3646, 2001.<br />

[8] S. Marcuccio, G. L. Lorenzi, and M. A. Centrospazio, “Development <strong>of</strong> a<br />

miniaturized field emission propulsion system,” AIAA98-3919, 1998.<br />

[9] J. Mueller, “Thruster options <strong>for</strong> microspacecraft: A review and evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> existing hardware and emerging technologies,” AIAA97-3058, 1997.<br />

[10] F. M. Pranajaya and M. A. Cappelli, “Development <strong>of</strong> a colloid<br />

micro-thruster <strong>for</strong> flight demonstration on <strong>the</strong> emerald nanosatellite,”<br />

AIAA2001-23, 2001.<br />

[11] E. Y. Choueiri, “Overview <strong>of</strong> U.S. academic programs in electric propulsion,”<br />

presented at <strong>the</strong> 35th AIAA Joint Propulsion Conf., Los Angeles,<br />

CA, Jun. 1999.<br />

[12] J. Mueller, I. Chakraborty, S. Vargo, C. Marrese, V. White, and D. Bame,<br />

“Towards micropropulsion systems on-a-chip: Initial results <strong>of</strong> component<br />

feasibility studies,” in Proc. <strong>IEEE</strong> Aerospace Conf., vol. 4, 2000, pp. 149–<br />

168.<br />

[13] V. Khayms and M. Martinez-Sanchez, “<strong>Design</strong> <strong>of</strong> a miniaturized Hall<br />

thruster <strong>for</strong> microsatellites,” AIAA96-3291, 1996.<br />

[14] M. Young and E. P. Munta, “Unique hollow cathode as a code validation<br />

experiment and candidate non-magnetic ion micro-thruster,” AIAA99-<br />

2854, 1999.<br />

[15] P. J. Turchi, I. G. Mikellides, P. G. Mikellides, and H. Kamhawi, “Optimization<br />

<strong>of</strong> pulsed plasma thrusters <strong>for</strong> microsatellite propulsion,”<br />

AIAA99-2301, 1999.<br />

[16] L. Wei, W. Baoping, G. Li, Y. Hanchun, and T. Yan, “Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

emission per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> field emitter with Laplace interpolation method,”<br />

Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 161, pp. 1–8, 2000.<br />

[17] A. M. Ganan-Calvo, “The surface charge in electrospraying: Its nature<br />

and its universal scaling laws,” J. Aerosol Sci., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 863–872,<br />

1999.<br />

[18] A. Jaworek and A. Krupa, “Classification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> modes <strong>of</strong> EHD spraying,”<br />

J. Aerosol Sci., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 873–893, 1999.<br />

[19] G. I. Taylor, “Disintegration <strong>of</strong> water drops in an electric field,” Proc. R.<br />

Soc. A, vol. 3, pp. 383–397, 1964.<br />

[20] J. F. de la Mora and I. G. Loscertales, “The current emitted by highly<br />

conducting Taylor cones,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 260, pp. 155–184, 1994.<br />

[21] P. D. Noymer and M. Garel, “Stability and atomization characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

electrohydrodynamic jets in <strong>the</strong> cone-jet and multi-jet modes,” J. Aerosol<br />

Sci., vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1165–1172, 2000.<br />

[22] R. P. A. Hartman, D. J. Brunner, D. M. A. Camelot, J. C. M. Marijinissen,<br />

and B. Scarlett, “Jet break-up in electrohydrodynamic atomization in <strong>the</strong><br />

cone-jet mode,” J. Aerosol Sci., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 65–95, 2000.<br />

[23] S. W. Janson and H. Helvajian, “MEMS, microengineering and serospace<br />

systems,” presented at <strong>the</strong> AIAA Joint Propulsion Conf., 1999, Paper<br />

AIAA99-3802.<br />

[24] J. Mueller et al. “A review and applicability assessment <strong>of</strong> MEMS-Based<br />

microvalve technologies <strong>for</strong> microspacecraft propulsion, ” presented at<br />

<strong>the</strong> AIAA Joint Propulsion Conf., 1999, Paper AIAA99-2725.<br />

[25] D. H. Lewis, S. W. Janson, R. B. Cohen, and E. K. Antonsson, “Digital<br />

micropropulsion,” Sens. Actuators A, Phys., vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 143–154,<br />

2000.<br />

[26] J. Mueller, I. Chakraborty, D. Bame, W. Tang, R. Lawton, and A. Wallace,<br />

“Pro<strong>of</strong>-<strong>of</strong>-concept demonstration <strong>of</strong> a vaporizing liquid micro-thruster, ”<br />

presented at <strong>the</strong> AIAA Joint Propulsion Conf., 1998, Paper AIAA98-3924.<br />

[27] M. Paine and S. Gabriel, “A micro-fabricated colloidal thruster array, ”<br />

presented at <strong>the</strong> AIAA Joint Propulsion Conf., 2001, Paper AIAA2001-<br />

3329.<br />

[28] R. S. Elliott, “Electromagnetics: History, <strong>the</strong>ory, and applications,” in<br />

<strong>IEEE</strong> Press Series on Electromagnetic Waves. New York: <strong>IEEE</strong> Press,<br />

1991, pp. 152–165.<br />

[29] P. Moon and D. E. Spencer, Field Theory Handbook, New York:<br />

Springer, 1971.<br />

[30] G. Xie, High <strong>Voltage</strong> Electrostatic Field. Shanghai, China: Shanghai<br />

Science and Technology, 1987 (in Chinese).<br />

[31] A. Beyer and D. Kö<strong>the</strong>r, “Solution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> direct stationary current problem<br />

<strong>of</strong> a three-axial ellipsoid,” Arch. Elecktrotechnik, vol. 71, pp. 131–137,<br />

1988.<br />

Jijun Xiong received <strong>the</strong> B.S. and M.S. degrees from<br />

<strong>the</strong> North China Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology in Shanxi,<br />

China, in 1993 and 1998, respectively, both in electrical<br />

engineering. He received <strong>the</strong> Ph.D. degree from<br />

Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, in 2003.<br />

From 2002 to 2003, he was a Research Assistant<br />

with <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Manufacturing Engineering<br />

and Engineering Management at <strong>the</strong> City University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China. He was<br />

an Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor in <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Electrical<br />

Engineering <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> North University <strong>of</strong> China. He<br />

is currently with <strong>the</strong> Key Laboratory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> State Education Ministry on Instrumentation<br />

Science and Dynamic Measurement, North University <strong>of</strong> China,<br />

Shan’xi, China. His recent research interests lie in <strong>the</strong> fields <strong>of</strong> measurement<br />

and MEMS.<br />

Dong Sun (S’95–M’00) received <strong>the</strong> B.Sc. and M.Sc.<br />

degrees from Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, in<br />

1990 and 1994, respectively, both in mechatronics.<br />

He received <strong>the</strong> Ph.D. degree in robotics and automation<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong,<br />

Hong Kong, in 1997.<br />

He was a Postdoctoral Researcher with <strong>the</strong> University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Toronto and a Research and Development Engineer<br />

with Ontario Industry. Since 2000, he has been<br />

with <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Manufacturing Engineering<br />

and Engineering Management at <strong>the</strong> City University


74 <strong>IEEE</strong>/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 11, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2006<br />

<strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong, Kong, China, where he is now an Associate<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor. He is also an Adjunct Pr<strong>of</strong>essor at <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Toronto. His<br />

research interests lie in robotics and automation, motion controls, and mechatronics.<br />

Dr. Sun is a Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Engineer in <strong>the</strong> Province <strong>of</strong> Ontario, Canada.<br />

Since 2004, he has served as an Associate Editor <strong>for</strong> <strong>IEEE</strong> TRANSACTIONS ON<br />

ROBOTICS.<br />

He is an Editor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> International Journal <strong>of</strong> Micromechatronics and Sensors<br />

and Actuators A: Physical. He also serves as Vice President <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> China<br />

Instrument Society. He has received 30 patents, three national awards, and ten<br />

Ministry Awards <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology Invention and Achievement.<br />

Zhaoying Zhou (SM’02) graduated from <strong>the</strong> Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Precision Instruments <strong>of</strong> Tsinghua University,<br />

Beijing, China, in 1961.<br />

From 1979 to 1981, he was a Visiting Scientist<br />

at <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Automatic Control <strong>of</strong> Lund<br />

University, Lund, Sweden. He is currently a Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Precision Instruments<br />

and Mechanology and Chairman <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Academic<br />

Committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Micro/Nano Technology Research<br />

Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. He has<br />

published more than 300 scientific and technical papers.<br />

His recent research interests lie in <strong>the</strong> fields <strong>of</strong> measurement, control, and<br />

micro/nano technology.<br />

Wendong Zhang (M’02) received <strong>the</strong> Ph.D. degree<br />

from Beijing Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Beijing, China,<br />

in 1995.<br />

From 1996 to 1998, he was a Postdoctoral Researcher<br />

at Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.<br />

From 1998 to 2001, he conducted his research at<br />

<strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia at Berkeley and at <strong>the</strong><br />

National Measurement Laboratory, Japan. He is currently<br />

<strong>the</strong> President <strong>of</strong> North University <strong>of</strong> China,<br />

Shan’xi, China, where he is also with <strong>the</strong> Key Laboratory<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> State Education Ministry on Instrumentation<br />

Science and Dynamic Measurement. His recent research interests lie in<br />

<strong>the</strong> fields <strong>of</strong> instrumentation science and MEMS.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!