Government Structure in the New Testament Church - Living Church ...
Government Structure in the New Testament Church - Living Church ...
Government Structure in the New Testament Church - Living Church ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>Structure</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Testament</strong> <strong>Church</strong> 8<br />
Scripture says that it’s a characteristic of false teachers to despise authority and speak evil of<br />
dignitaries. Jude also warns of those who “reject authority, and speak evil of dignitaries” (verse<br />
8), and of “murmurers, compla<strong>in</strong>ers, walk<strong>in</strong>g accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>ir own lusts” and “mockers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
last time” who “cause divisions” (16, 18-19). It’s been reported to me by reliable witnesses that<br />
a member of <strong>the</strong> Global <strong>Church</strong> of God Council of Elders, a lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stigator of hostility and<br />
rebellion aga<strong>in</strong>st Dr. Meredith’s leadership, openly mocked him while <strong>the</strong> Council was <strong>in</strong><br />
session.<br />
1 Thessalonians 5:12-14. The brethren are called upon to “recognize” those who are “over you<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord.” The authority of <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>istry is implied <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> words chosen. The Greek word<br />
translated “recognize,” eido, <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> idea of observ<strong>in</strong>g, evaluat<strong>in</strong>g, as well as hav<strong>in</strong>g regard<br />
for. The responsibility of <strong>the</strong> members to evaluate <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong>ir leadership is also expressed<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>struction to “esteem <strong>the</strong>m highly <strong>in</strong> love for <strong>the</strong>ir works sake” (verse 13). Aga<strong>in</strong>, if <strong>the</strong><br />
works of m<strong>in</strong>isters reflect faithfulness, <strong>the</strong>y are to be respected and esteemed. Note that <strong>the</strong><br />
words imply not a super-critical approach but one based on love, fairness and graciousness, but<br />
none<strong>the</strong>less vigilant.<br />
These pr<strong>in</strong>ciples apply also to m<strong>in</strong>isters with respect to those who are over <strong>the</strong>m, as God has<br />
established a l<strong>in</strong>e of authority with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> body of Christ. Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se precepts results <strong>in</strong><br />
peace <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong>. And, we may conclude, violat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m will produce <strong>the</strong> opposite effect.<br />
Those who are “unruly” are to be warned (verse 14). The Greek word, ataktos, <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> idea<br />
of be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>subord<strong>in</strong>ate or disorderly. Thus, implied is <strong>the</strong> requirement to be submissive to <strong>the</strong><br />
authority with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong> with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> framework of God’s Word.<br />
These are unambiguous Scriptures that show clearly government emanat<strong>in</strong>g from God’s<br />
authority as Supreme Ruler entrusted to <strong>in</strong>dividual leaders placed over a m<strong>in</strong>istry, who <strong>in</strong> turn<br />
appo<strong>in</strong>t o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dividual leaders to adm<strong>in</strong>ister smaller units of <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>istry. There is no evidence<br />
that God has placed adm<strong>in</strong>istrative authority <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hands of boards or councils, or<br />
similar bodies where vot<strong>in</strong>g and political maneuver<strong>in</strong>g are accepted practices. The testimony of<br />
Scripture <strong>in</strong> its entirety confirms this general pattern. (What prophet of God answered to a<br />
“board”?) God holds accountable <strong>in</strong>dividual m<strong>in</strong>isters for how each conducts his job, junior<br />
m<strong>in</strong>isters be<strong>in</strong>g also accountable to those placed over <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong> authority (1 Cor<strong>in</strong>thians 4:1-4;<br />
9:27; James 3:1; 1 Timothy 5:19-20). Each <strong>in</strong>dividual member, however, must answer for<br />
himself to God (Roman 14:11-12), and is required to “test <strong>the</strong> spirits, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y are of God”<br />
(1 John 4:1). If a member is satisfied that <strong>the</strong> servant placed over him is meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> standard of<br />
faithfulness accord<strong>in</strong>g to God’s Word, he is obligated to submit to <strong>the</strong> authority of <strong>the</strong> leadership<br />
God is us<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Objections. Those who wish to escape <strong>the</strong> clear teach<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> Bible <strong>in</strong> this matter, revealed <strong>in</strong><br />
dozens of Scriptures — only a sample of which we have specifically reviewed here —<br />
commonly turn to a few Scriptural examples which can be twisted to seem to contradict what we<br />
have learned. Primary among <strong>the</strong>se are as follows:<br />
Acts 6:1-6. This is used as proof of congregational rule s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> brethren had a hand <strong>in</strong><br />
select<strong>in</strong>g deacons to serve <strong>the</strong> church (Acts 6:3). A closer exam<strong>in</strong>ation, however, reveals that <strong>the</strong><br />
apostles were firmly <strong>in</strong> control. The apostles summoned <strong>the</strong> church to discuss <strong>the</strong> matter (Acts<br />
6:2). The church members selected certa<strong>in</strong> men and recommended <strong>the</strong>m to <strong>the</strong> apostles, but <strong>the</strong>