Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
164 HI. PROLES ARACIINES<br />
There are still no records of fossil spiders from the southern hemisphere.<br />
CLASSIFICATION<br />
The classification of spiders has always presented the difficulties that<br />
are provided by any large group of animals in which the number of<br />
known species and genera is rapidly increasing, and in which the course<br />
of evolution is so obscure that it can be traced only in outline.<br />
Many systematists have agreed in recognizing three sub-orders, the<br />
first or most primitive of which is the Liphistiomorphae, containing the<br />
Asiatic Liphistiidae. The second sub-order contains the Theraphosomorphae,<br />
previously known as the M ygalomorphae: the character of<br />
these two groups is outlined above. All other spiders were placed in the<br />
third sub-order, Arachnomorphae or Araneomorphae or Gnaphosomorphae.<br />
The breaking up of the second sub-order into eight or nine families<br />
has not proved to be difficult; not so the many families in the third suborder.<br />
It has not proved easy to construct a truly phylogenetic system,<br />
so that schemes proposed have been purely artificial ones, based on<br />
external characteristics, and valuable chiefly because it made easier the<br />
identification of any specimen under examination. This is the practical<br />
value of any system of classifying objects of any sort.<br />
One classification stands out above all the others, that of Petrunkevitch<br />
in 1933, a courageous attempt to include internal structures<br />
among the characteristics used.<br />
As a result of cutting sections of all representative Petrunkevitch<br />
based his first divisions on the number of ostia through which<br />
the heart communicated with the pericardium. There is no doubt that<br />
the basic idea that all the organs of an animal should be considered in<br />
making a natural system of classification is theoretically so sound as to be<br />
beyond criticism; it is equally undoubted that very few practising<br />
systematists have both the time and the skill needed to or to<br />
section all the animals they are asked to name, and as a result Petrunke~<br />
vitch's system has beer: universally admired and simultaneously<br />
neglected.<br />
Other systems have in general been attempts to improve on their<br />
predecessors: all made use of external features easily visible-the<br />
presence or absence of a cribellum, the simplicity or complexity of the<br />
sex organs, tbe existence of two or of three claws on the tarsi-and it<br />
be readily understood that the systems suggested have become ever<br />
more complex.<br />
In the latest system, that of Bonnet ( 1959), in the second volume of his<br />
18. THE ORDER ARANEAE 165<br />
"Bibliographia Araneorum", there is a summary of the characteristics<br />
of its predecessors, criticizes them where criticism is necessary, and adds<br />
that, with the objections now clearly seen, "c'est le fruit mur qui ne<br />
demande qu'a etre cueilli".<br />
The result contains nine taxa above the genus, namely sub-order,<br />
legion, sub-legion, super-cohort, cohort, sub-cohort, super-family,<br />
family and sub-family. It also gives a number of new names to some of<br />
the taxa which do not come under the notice of the International Rules<br />
of Zoological Nomenclature, and which were revised for various<br />
reasons, some of them merely linguistic.<br />
Bonnet's is the most elaborate and detailed classification of spiders as<br />
yet published, and would probably have received universal acceptance<br />
and approval had it not appeared at the end of his encyclopaedic<br />
Bibliographia Araneorum, whose circle of readers could not be a wide<br />
one. In outline it was as follows:<br />
Sub-order Mesothelae<br />
Legion Liphistiomorphae<br />
Sub-order Opisthothelae<br />
Super-legion Orthognatha<br />
Legion Theraphosomorphae<br />
Super-legion Labidognatha<br />
Legion Gnaphosomorphae<br />
Sub-legion Cribellatae<br />
Ecribellatae<br />
Super-cohort Apneumonatae<br />
Cohort Telemoidea<br />
Super-cohort Dipneumonatae<br />
Cohort Sicarioidea<br />
Cohort Argiopoidea<br />
Sub-cohort Trionycha<br />
Sub-cohort Dionycha<br />
2 families<br />
9 families<br />
12 families<br />
3 families<br />
6 families<br />
16 families<br />
12 families<br />
This scheme embraces a total of 60 families, to which several newly<br />
established families may be added. These include the Toxopidae,<br />
Gradungulidae, Textricellidae, Micropholcommatidae and Austrochilidae<br />
from the southern hemisphere; some new families produced by<br />
a splitting of the Sicariidae, and at least seven fossil families from amber.<br />
KEY GIVING PARTIAL SEPARATION OF THE ABOVE GROUPS<br />
Spinnerets in mid-ventral region of opisthosoma<br />
(~fesotheJae)<br />
LIPHISTIOMORPHAE<br />
2 ( 1) Spinnerets at posterior end of opisthosoma<br />
(Opisthothelae) 3<br />
3 ( 4) Chelicerae striking vertically and parallel<br />
(Orthognatha)<br />
THERAPHOSOMORPHAE