Savory - Arachnida 1977

Savory - Arachnida 1977 Savory - Arachnida 1977

arthur59611540
from arthur59611540 More from this publisher
22.06.2015 Views

260 IV. DE ARACH:'

262 IV. DE ARACHNOLOGIA spiders quickly became the chief occupation of his leisure. He had many of the ideal qualifications for an arachnologist, a scientific training, a keen eye for important detail, a gift for identification and the energy of a successful collector. Undoubtedly his greatest service to the science was the ungrudging help that he gave to all who appealed to him for assistance. This generosity had its tragic side, for it absorbed the time that might otherwise have been given to the writing of the badly needed book on the spiders of Britain. Yet it found its reward later in the work of those to whom he had passed on his knowledge and technique: the writings ofBristowe, Locket, and Millidge may, in effect, be regarded both as his memorial and as the sources of the widespread interest in Arachnida in Britain today. Among the contemporaries ofJ ackson were Warburton, Hull and Kew. Cecil Warburton ( 1854-1958) spent the whole of his professional life as a lecturer in Cambridge University. He was one of the first to make a careful search for spiders in the famous collecting area of Wicken Fen, and later he investigated the silk glands of Araneus and described the life cycle of Agelena. In 1909 the Cambridge Natural History contained his contribution on Arachnida, chapters which for many years were the recognized authoritative source of information readily available to English readers. After the First World War he transferred his attention to the Acari, and at the Molteno Institute took an important share in the production of an exhaustive treatise on ticks. He retired from his post of zoologist to the Agricultural Society when he was 92, and at the time of his death at 104 was probably the oldest man in Britain. The Rev. J. E. Hull ( 1863-1960) was a north-country clergyman with a special interest in spiders and mites. The minute spiders of the large family Linyphiidae came especially to his notice, and much of his work was concerned with their names and classification, as well as with the description of new species. Harry Wallis Kew ( 1868-1930) was for many years the chief authority on the false scorpions of Britain and Ireland. He was the first to describe their courtship, and to show how their different instars could be distinguished. In this and other ways he was a pioneer in the acquisition of precise knowledge of an unusually interesting group. The influence of Jackson, Hull, Kew and others lives on in the continuing and increasingly successful work of those who were inspired by their example and helped by their advice. The results are to be seen in the energy and enthusiasm that secured the foundation of the British Arachnological Society, and in the existence of an up-to-date threevolume work on British spiders, of such quality that the names of G. H. Locket, A. F. Millidge and P. Merrett are unquestionably assured of immortality. 31. HISTORICAL ARACHNOLOGY 263 Significant as were the efforts of Blackwall and Pickard-Cambridge in Britain, more important events were taking place in France. Eugene Simon ( 1848-1924) realized from a comparison of Walckenaer's book with that of Hahn and Koch how great were the possibilities in a study of the Arachnida of France. Quickly he passed to the spiders of the world, a project truly sufficient for a man's lifetime. In pursuit of his ambition Simon became a traveller and collector, accumulating specimens wherever he went. These and the innumerable spiders sent to him by correspondents all over the world he described in annual papers, while at the same time he was at work on two encyclopaedic publications, his "Arachnides de France" (1874-1937) and the "Histoire Naturelle des Araignees" (1892-1903). The industry and devotion that made such an achievement possible have seldom been equalled. Simon received universal recognition as the supreme authority on all matters connected with spiders. Unlike most zoologists, he had also to create a systematic classification as he worked, while he surprised everyone by his phenomenal memory of all the spiders that had passed through his hands. His publications numbered 319 titles and his collection was contained in over 20,000 numbered tubes. A career of this kind was bound to influence others, who were ready to carry on the work of the master. Thus there existed in France after the Kaiser's War a nucleus of zoologists from whom arose a French school of arachnologists that has ever since included some of the leaders in our subject. Louis Fage ( 1883-1964) was a marine zoologist at Banyuls who, moving in 1920 to Paris, added spiders to his already broad zoological interests. He specialized in the study of Arachnida in caves. Among his contemporaries was Lucien Berland (1888-1962), an entomologist who was attracted by the Arachnida. His concern was largely with the arachnids of islands, and he made valuable contributions to zoogeography. In addition he wrote a full, general account of the class in "Les Arachnides" in 1932, and this, with other shorter books, did much to extend the general interest in spiders and scorpions. On these foundations developed the great advances in Arachnology that we owe to such living zoologists as Bonnet, Millot and Vachon. It is impossible to refrain from a mention of Bonnet's monumental "Bibliographia Araneorum" which surveys all publications about spiders from the earliest times until 1939. Equally there must be recorded the great organization Centre International de Documentation Arachnologique, which under the care of Max Vachon, brings together the arachnologists of every nation. The early work in France ofLatreille and Walckenaer was paralleled

262 IV. DE ARACHNOLOGIA<br />

spiders quickly became the chief occupation of his leisure. He had<br />

many of the ideal qualifications for an arachnologist, a scientific training,<br />

a keen eye for important detail, a gift for identification and the<br />

energy of a successful collector. Undoubtedly his greatest service to the<br />

science was the ungrudging help that he gave to all who appealed to him<br />

for assistance. This generosity had its tragic side, for it absorbed the<br />

time that might otherwise have been given to the writing of the badly<br />

needed book on the spiders of Britain. Yet it found its reward later in<br />

the work of those to whom he had passed on his knowledge and technique:<br />

the writings ofBristowe, Locket, and Millidge may, in effect, be<br />

regarded both as his memorial and as the sources of the widespread<br />

interest in <strong>Arachnida</strong> in Britain today.<br />

Among the contemporaries ofJ ackson were Warburton, Hull and Kew.<br />

Cecil Warburton ( 1854-1958) spent the whole of his professional life<br />

as a lecturer in Cambridge University. He was one of the first to make a<br />

careful search for spiders in the famous collecting area of Wicken Fen,<br />

and later he investigated the silk glands of Araneus and described the<br />

life cycle of Agelena. In 1909 the Cambridge Natural History contained<br />

his contribution on <strong>Arachnida</strong>, chapters which for many years were the<br />

recognized authoritative source of information readily available to<br />

English readers. After the First World War he transferred his attention<br />

to the Acari, and at the Molteno Institute took an important share in the<br />

production of an exhaustive treatise on ticks. He retired from his post<br />

of zoologist to the Agricultural Society when he was 92, and at the time<br />

of his death at 104 was probably the oldest man in Britain.<br />

The Rev. J. E. Hull ( 1863-1960) was a north-country clergyman with<br />

a special interest in spiders and mites. The minute spiders of the large<br />

family Linyphiidae came especially to his notice, and much of his<br />

work was concerned with their names and classification, as well as with<br />

the description of new species.<br />

Harry Wallis Kew ( 1868-1930) was for many years the chief authority<br />

on the false scorpions of Britain and Ireland. He was the first to describe<br />

their courtship, and to show how their different instars could be distinguished.<br />

In this and other ways he was a pioneer in the acquisition of<br />

precise knowledge of an unusually interesting group.<br />

The influence of Jackson, Hull, Kew and others lives on in the continuing<br />

and increasingly successful work of those who were inspired by<br />

their example and helped by their advice. The results are to be seen in<br />

the energy and enthusiasm that secured the foundation of the British<br />

Arachnological Society, and in the existence of an up-to-date threevolume<br />

work on British spiders, of such quality that the names of G. H.<br />

Locket, A. F. Millidge and P. Merrett are unquestionably assured of<br />

immortality.<br />

31. HISTORICAL ARACHNOLOGY 263<br />

Significant as were the efforts of Blackwall and Pickard-Cambridge<br />

in Britain, more important events were taking place in France.<br />

Eugene Simon ( 1848-1924) realized from a comparison of<br />

Walckenaer's book with that of Hahn and Koch how great were the<br />

possibilities in a study of the <strong>Arachnida</strong> of France. Quickly he passed to<br />

the spiders of the world, a project truly sufficient for a man's lifetime.<br />

In pursuit of his ambition Simon became a traveller and collector,<br />

accumulating specimens wherever he went. These and the innumerable<br />

spiders sent to him by correspondents all over the world he described in<br />

annual papers, while at the same time he was at work on two encyclopaedic<br />

publications, his "Arachnides de France" (1874-1937) and the<br />

"Histoire Naturelle des Araignees" (1892-1903). The industry and<br />

devotion that made such an achievement possible have seldom been<br />

equalled. Simon received universal recognition as the supreme authority<br />

on all matters connected with spiders. Unlike most zoologists, he had<br />

also to create a systematic classification as he worked, while he surprised<br />

everyone by his phenomenal memory of all the spiders that had<br />

passed through his hands. His publications numbered 319 titles and his<br />

collection was contained in over 20,000 numbered tubes.<br />

A career of this kind was bound to influence others, who were ready<br />

to carry on the work of the master. Thus there existed in France after the<br />

Kaiser's War a nucleus of zoologists from whom arose a French school<br />

of arachnologists that has ever since included some of the leaders in our<br />

subject.<br />

Louis Fage ( 1883-1964) was a marine zoologist at Banyuls who,<br />

moving in 1920 to Paris, added spiders to his already broad zoological<br />

interests. He specialized in the study of <strong>Arachnida</strong> in caves. Among his<br />

contemporaries was Lucien Berland (1888-1962), an entomologist who<br />

was attracted by the <strong>Arachnida</strong>. His concern was largely with the arachnids<br />

of islands, and he made valuable contributions to zoogeography. In<br />

addition he wrote a full, general account of the class in "Les Arachnides"<br />

in 1932, and this, with other shorter books, did much to extend the<br />

general interest in spiders and scorpions.<br />

On these foundations developed the great advances in Arachnology<br />

that we owe to such living zoologists as Bonnet, Millot and Vachon. It is<br />

impossible to refrain from a mention of Bonnet's monumental "Bibliographia<br />

Araneorum" which surveys all publications about spiders from<br />

the earliest times until 1939. Equally there must be recorded the great<br />

organization Centre International de Documentation Arachnologique,<br />

which under the care of Max Vachon, brings together the arachnologists<br />

of every nation.<br />

The early work in France ofLatreille and Walckenaer was paralleled

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!