22.06.2015 Views

Savory - Arachnida 1977

Savory - Arachnida 1977

Savory - Arachnida 1977

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

218 Ill. PROLES ARACHNES<br />

family, Holotergidae, because the opisthosoma seemed to be covered<br />

with a hard unsegmented shield, showing none of the transverse sutures<br />

characteristic of all the other genera.<br />

CLASSIFICATION<br />

The order has at all times been limited to a single family, at first called<br />

Cryptostemmatoidae or Poliocheridae. The name Cryptostemma<br />

Guerin, 1838, for the type genus is, however, preoccupied by Cryptostemma<br />

Herrich-Schaffer, 1835, for the Hemiptera, and for this reason<br />

Ewing ( 1929) proposed the name Ricinoides for the genus and Ricinoidae<br />

for the family. Ewing gives the following table for the classification.<br />

I (2)<br />

2 (I)<br />

3 (4)<br />

4 (3)<br />

5 (6)<br />

6 (5)<br />

CLASSIFICATION OF THE ORDER RICINULEI<br />

Second coxae subtriangular and not meeting on<br />

middle line<br />

Second coxae broad, plate-like and meeting on<br />

middle line<br />

Opisthosoma divided into tergites: palaeozoic<br />

Opisthosoma uniform: palaeozoic<br />

Last segment of chelicerae opposed by two processes<br />

on penultimate segment: fourth segment<br />

of tarsus 2 longer than fifth<br />

Last segment of chelicerae opposed by one process<br />

on penultimate segment: fourth segment of<br />

tarsus 2 shorter than fifth<br />

5<br />

Poliochera Scudder<br />

Curculioides Buckland<br />

3<br />

Ricinoides Ewing<br />

Cryptocellus Westwood<br />

One of the noteworthy features about Ricinulei is due to an accident<br />

which caused someone somewhere to describe them as "primitive<br />

<strong>Arachnida</strong>", and this adjective was universally applied to them by every<br />

writer until 1945b, when Millot pointed out how inappropriate it is.<br />

In truth the word primitive seems to impose upon its readers a<br />

passive receptivity which prevents them from ever questioning its<br />

accuracy. This is perhaps because the opinion that a given animal is<br />

primitive gives one a comfortable feeling of security. This at least, one<br />

feels, is where we begin. Where do we go from here? The answer to<br />

which question is that we should try to determine in how many ways the<br />

so-called primitive animal has specializations peculiar to itself.<br />

In fact, Mitchell ( 1972) lists 11 features characteristic of the Ricinulei<br />

and distinguishing them from all other orders. So large a number<br />

argues an early origin and a long period of evolutionary specialization.<br />

The second remarkable fact about Ricinulei is their rarity. The first<br />

living specimen was found in 1838, and by 1931, 93 years later, a total<br />

2 7. THE ORDER RICINULEI<br />

219<br />

of 21 more specimens had been reported. Then, in 1933, came the<br />

extraordinary capture by I. T. Sanderson of 317 specimens of R.<br />

sjostedti in the Cameroons, and the following 20 years added about<br />

40 more specimens, belonging to a dozen species.<br />

Hence at one time it could be said that a probably unique feature of<br />

the Ricinulei was that they were an order well known for over a century,<br />

during which period not only every species but actually every specimen<br />

captured could readily be traced.<br />

Such a statement of rarity can no longer be made. In 1966 my former<br />

pupil]. Pollock took about 150 specimens of R. afzelii in Sierra Leone,<br />

and in Guyana the late G. P. Lampel in 1959 collected over 50<br />

specimens of two new species. More remarkable results, however, followed<br />

the exploration of the Mexican caves by Mitchell and others.<br />

The American genus Cryptocellus had long been less well represented<br />

than Ricinoides, but between 1967 and 1973 specimens of the former<br />

were being found in hundreds. One cave, La Cueva de la Florida,<br />

yielded 1,035 specimens of C. pelae;;:i. In the same years the number of<br />

known species was more than doubled and now approaches 30.<br />

Two features of the Ricinulei combine to make them the most romantic<br />

order of the <strong>Arachnida</strong>, and might even support a claim to be placed<br />

among the most absorbing orders of the animal kingdom. These are<br />

their discovery in fossil form before a living specimen was found; and<br />

the reputation for extreme rarity, which they retained for more than a<br />

hundred years.<br />

Add to this the unusual number of their anatomical specializations, and<br />

the conclusion is unassailable that the unique Ricinulei are the most<br />

fascinating, the most intriguing and the most challenging members of<br />

the invertebrate world.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!