You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
218 Ill. PROLES ARACHNES<br />
family, Holotergidae, because the opisthosoma seemed to be covered<br />
with a hard unsegmented shield, showing none of the transverse sutures<br />
characteristic of all the other genera.<br />
CLASSIFICATION<br />
The order has at all times been limited to a single family, at first called<br />
Cryptostemmatoidae or Poliocheridae. The name Cryptostemma<br />
Guerin, 1838, for the type genus is, however, preoccupied by Cryptostemma<br />
Herrich-Schaffer, 1835, for the Hemiptera, and for this reason<br />
Ewing ( 1929) proposed the name Ricinoides for the genus and Ricinoidae<br />
for the family. Ewing gives the following table for the classification.<br />
I (2)<br />
2 (I)<br />
3 (4)<br />
4 (3)<br />
5 (6)<br />
6 (5)<br />
CLASSIFICATION OF THE ORDER RICINULEI<br />
Second coxae subtriangular and not meeting on<br />
middle line<br />
Second coxae broad, plate-like and meeting on<br />
middle line<br />
Opisthosoma divided into tergites: palaeozoic<br />
Opisthosoma uniform: palaeozoic<br />
Last segment of chelicerae opposed by two processes<br />
on penultimate segment: fourth segment<br />
of tarsus 2 longer than fifth<br />
Last segment of chelicerae opposed by one process<br />
on penultimate segment: fourth segment of<br />
tarsus 2 shorter than fifth<br />
5<br />
Poliochera Scudder<br />
Curculioides Buckland<br />
3<br />
Ricinoides Ewing<br />
Cryptocellus Westwood<br />
One of the noteworthy features about Ricinulei is due to an accident<br />
which caused someone somewhere to describe them as "primitive<br />
<strong>Arachnida</strong>", and this adjective was universally applied to them by every<br />
writer until 1945b, when Millot pointed out how inappropriate it is.<br />
In truth the word primitive seems to impose upon its readers a<br />
passive receptivity which prevents them from ever questioning its<br />
accuracy. This is perhaps because the opinion that a given animal is<br />
primitive gives one a comfortable feeling of security. This at least, one<br />
feels, is where we begin. Where do we go from here? The answer to<br />
which question is that we should try to determine in how many ways the<br />
so-called primitive animal has specializations peculiar to itself.<br />
In fact, Mitchell ( 1972) lists 11 features characteristic of the Ricinulei<br />
and distinguishing them from all other orders. So large a number<br />
argues an early origin and a long period of evolutionary specialization.<br />
The second remarkable fact about Ricinulei is their rarity. The first<br />
living specimen was found in 1838, and by 1931, 93 years later, a total<br />
2 7. THE ORDER RICINULEI<br />
219<br />
of 21 more specimens had been reported. Then, in 1933, came the<br />
extraordinary capture by I. T. Sanderson of 317 specimens of R.<br />
sjostedti in the Cameroons, and the following 20 years added about<br />
40 more specimens, belonging to a dozen species.<br />
Hence at one time it could be said that a probably unique feature of<br />
the Ricinulei was that they were an order well known for over a century,<br />
during which period not only every species but actually every specimen<br />
captured could readily be traced.<br />
Such a statement of rarity can no longer be made. In 1966 my former<br />
pupil]. Pollock took about 150 specimens of R. afzelii in Sierra Leone,<br />
and in Guyana the late G. P. Lampel in 1959 collected over 50<br />
specimens of two new species. More remarkable results, however, followed<br />
the exploration of the Mexican caves by Mitchell and others.<br />
The American genus Cryptocellus had long been less well represented<br />
than Ricinoides, but between 1967 and 1973 specimens of the former<br />
were being found in hundreds. One cave, La Cueva de la Florida,<br />
yielded 1,035 specimens of C. pelae;;:i. In the same years the number of<br />
known species was more than doubled and now approaches 30.<br />
Two features of the Ricinulei combine to make them the most romantic<br />
order of the <strong>Arachnida</strong>, and might even support a claim to be placed<br />
among the most absorbing orders of the animal kingdom. These are<br />
their discovery in fossil form before a living specimen was found; and<br />
the reputation for extreme rarity, which they retained for more than a<br />
hundred years.<br />
Add to this the unusual number of their anatomical specializations, and<br />
the conclusion is unassailable that the unique Ricinulei are the most<br />
fascinating, the most intriguing and the most challenging members of<br />
the invertebrate world.