20.06.2015 Views

Over the Rainbow: - Wrestling With Angels

Over the Rainbow: - Wrestling With Angels

Over the Rainbow: - Wrestling With Angels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In February of 2010, Obama again disappointed homosexuals who were wanting to serve<br />

openly in <strong>the</strong> armed forces. Michael Mullen, <strong>the</strong> Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm., reported that <strong>the</strong><br />

Pentagon is conducting a year long review of policy change. President Obama and Congress will<br />

table this issue for <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> year (The Washington Times, 2010).<br />

Social Consequences of Normalizing Same-Sex Marriage (Blankenhorn, 2007:202-212)<br />

In considering <strong>the</strong> future of marriage, Dr. David Blankenhorn chaired three one-day<br />

seminars for researchers and family scholars in 2004 to address concerns raised by <strong>the</strong><br />

prospect of gay marriage. Seminars were held in New York City, Washington D.C. and Atlanta,<br />

Georgia, with a total of 40 people attending, including leading family scholars. Some had<br />

spoken out in favor of gay marriage and some against. Serious scholars and leaders wrestled<br />

with <strong>the</strong> issue in an attempt to see both sides.<br />

The results of <strong>the</strong> discussions confirmed that a movement toward gay marriage would not<br />

only affect a small minority but would constitute major social change. It became evident that<br />

<strong>the</strong> decision was not a morally easy one because when important goods conflict, any resolution<br />

will carry elements of loss. A diverse range of consequences were listed, both positive and<br />

negative.<br />

Positive social consequences of extending marriage benefits to same-sex couples included:<br />

* <strong>the</strong> improvement of well being and social worth for gays and lesbians,<br />

* increased tolerance and inclusion in society,<br />

* and equal treatment under <strong>the</strong> law.<br />

Extending marriage benefits would:<br />

* encourage gays to choose committed relationship,<br />

* contribute to more stability and longer lasting relationships,<br />

* and lead to less sexual promiscuity.<br />

Negative social consequences identified in changing <strong>the</strong> public meaning of marriage from a<br />

social institution to a private relationship between two people included:<br />

* <strong>the</strong> deinstitutionalization of marriage, contributing to a social devaluation of marriage,<br />

* endorsement of <strong>the</strong> idea that a child does not really need a mo<strong>the</strong>r and a fa<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

* opening <strong>the</strong> door to o<strong>the</strong>r forms of ‘marriage’, including group marriage and polygamy,<br />

<strong>Over</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Rainbow</strong>: The Gay Battle for Social Reorganization of America. 2010<br />

Dr. M. L. Coppock<br />

58 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!