Over the Rainbow: - Wrestling With Angels
Over the Rainbow: - Wrestling With Angels
Over the Rainbow: - Wrestling With Angels
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BACKLASH – Protecting Religious Liberties<br />
When church leadership moved toward changing sexual expectations to include practicing<br />
homosexuals as clergy and leaders, church members who leaned toward maintaining a<br />
scriptural foundation to <strong>the</strong> faith voted with <strong>the</strong>ir feet. Mainline churches had failed to<br />
educate <strong>the</strong>ir children into a compelling Christian message. Between 1965 and 1989 six<br />
mainline denominations (Evangelical Lu<strong>the</strong>ran, United Methodist, United Church of Christ,<br />
Episcopal, Presbyterian, and Disciples of Christ) reported a combined membership loss of 6.2<br />
million members. The churches that increased in membership were spiritually evangelical, in<br />
contrast to <strong>the</strong> secular liberalism of mainline denominations (Ostling, 1993).<br />
Bishop Harry R. Jackson, Jr, senior pastor of <strong>the</strong> 3,000 member Hope Christian Church in<br />
Washington D.C. argued in response to ENDA. “Sexual orientation should not be included in <strong>the</strong><br />
federally protected class list because unlike <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r characteristics, a person’s sexual<br />
orientation can change. I find it is an insult for myself as an African American that you are<br />
granting through this law special protection for sexual orientation that might only be<br />
imagined.” (Riley, 2009)<br />
Religious liberties are one of America’s most treasured values. Tony Perkins, President of<br />
<strong>the</strong> Family Research Council, says “The dangerous implications of <strong>the</strong> homosexual agenda are<br />
very real”. (Perkins, 2009). State-sanctioned same-sex unions pose a dangerous threat to religious<br />
liberties, not just for churches but for everyone. Heterosexual relationships, although <strong>the</strong> only<br />
relationships that can naturally reproduce, would be officially declared ‘nothing special’. Nondiscrimination<br />
laws would threaten <strong>the</strong> rights of individual believers trying to live <strong>the</strong>ir daily<br />
lives in accordance to <strong>the</strong>ir faith.<br />
Perkins lists ways in which individuals may be challenged in <strong>the</strong>ir faith or denied <strong>the</strong> right to<br />
express <strong>the</strong>ir personal religious values.<br />
*Individuals would be denied <strong>the</strong> right to express <strong>the</strong>ir views in regard to <strong>the</strong> gay lifestyle in<br />
public.<br />
* Private business owners would be required to provide benefits for same-sex domestic<br />
partners.<br />
* Organizations that challenged same-sex relationships may be denied government grants or<br />
aid.<br />
* Organizations might be denied access to public events.<br />
<strong>Over</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Rainbow</strong>: The Gay Battle for Social Reorganization of America. 2010<br />
Dr. M. L. Coppock<br />
53 | P a g e