20.06.2015 Views

Over the Rainbow: - Wrestling With Angels

Over the Rainbow: - Wrestling With Angels

Over the Rainbow: - Wrestling With Angels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BACKLASH – Protecting Religious Liberties<br />

When church leadership moved toward changing sexual expectations to include practicing<br />

homosexuals as clergy and leaders, church members who leaned toward maintaining a<br />

scriptural foundation to <strong>the</strong> faith voted with <strong>the</strong>ir feet. Mainline churches had failed to<br />

educate <strong>the</strong>ir children into a compelling Christian message. Between 1965 and 1989 six<br />

mainline denominations (Evangelical Lu<strong>the</strong>ran, United Methodist, United Church of Christ,<br />

Episcopal, Presbyterian, and Disciples of Christ) reported a combined membership loss of 6.2<br />

million members. The churches that increased in membership were spiritually evangelical, in<br />

contrast to <strong>the</strong> secular liberalism of mainline denominations (Ostling, 1993).<br />

Bishop Harry R. Jackson, Jr, senior pastor of <strong>the</strong> 3,000 member Hope Christian Church in<br />

Washington D.C. argued in response to ENDA. “Sexual orientation should not be included in <strong>the</strong><br />

federally protected class list because unlike <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r characteristics, a person’s sexual<br />

orientation can change. I find it is an insult for myself as an African American that you are<br />

granting through this law special protection for sexual orientation that might only be<br />

imagined.” (Riley, 2009)<br />

Religious liberties are one of America’s most treasured values. Tony Perkins, President of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Family Research Council, says “The dangerous implications of <strong>the</strong> homosexual agenda are<br />

very real”. (Perkins, 2009). State-sanctioned same-sex unions pose a dangerous threat to religious<br />

liberties, not just for churches but for everyone. Heterosexual relationships, although <strong>the</strong> only<br />

relationships that can naturally reproduce, would be officially declared ‘nothing special’. Nondiscrimination<br />

laws would threaten <strong>the</strong> rights of individual believers trying to live <strong>the</strong>ir daily<br />

lives in accordance to <strong>the</strong>ir faith.<br />

Perkins lists ways in which individuals may be challenged in <strong>the</strong>ir faith or denied <strong>the</strong> right to<br />

express <strong>the</strong>ir personal religious values.<br />

*Individuals would be denied <strong>the</strong> right to express <strong>the</strong>ir views in regard to <strong>the</strong> gay lifestyle in<br />

public.<br />

* Private business owners would be required to provide benefits for same-sex domestic<br />

partners.<br />

* Organizations that challenged same-sex relationships may be denied government grants or<br />

aid.<br />

* Organizations might be denied access to public events.<br />

<strong>Over</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Rainbow</strong>: The Gay Battle for Social Reorganization of America. 2010<br />

Dr. M. L. Coppock<br />

53 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!