Over the Rainbow: - Wrestling With Angels
Over the Rainbow: - Wrestling With Angels
Over the Rainbow: - Wrestling With Angels
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
as spouse and access to <strong>the</strong> hospital to visit a dying partner. Seeking to change this, lesbians<br />
and gay men created <strong>the</strong>ir own weddings and ceremonies. In 1993 at <strong>the</strong> third March on<br />
Washington for Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Rights three-thousand couples ga<strong>the</strong>red for a mass<br />
wedding. That same year <strong>the</strong> Hawaii Supreme Court, in response to an appeal from a lower<br />
court decision denying marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples, ruled that <strong>the</strong> prohibition<br />
of same-sex marriages constituted discrimination and was probably unconstitutional<br />
(GA,1996:231,235).<br />
The Lambda Legal Defense and Educational Fund had worked to lay a groundwork for<br />
winning <strong>the</strong> right for gays to marry. In 1995 <strong>the</strong>y announced <strong>the</strong> formation of its Marriage<br />
Project to serve as a national coordinator and clearinghouse. A network of volunteer<br />
attorneys, law professors, and law students were mobilized to research legal arguments against<br />
backlash. The Project developed <strong>the</strong> Marriage Resolution: “ Because marriage is a<br />
fundamental right under our Constitution, and because <strong>the</strong> Constitution guarantees equal<br />
protection under <strong>the</strong> law, RESOLVED, <strong>the</strong> State should permit gay and lesbian couples to marry<br />
and share fully and equally in <strong>the</strong> rights and responsibilities of marriage” (GA1996:258).<br />
Hawaii Considers Gay Marriage<br />
When Hawaii became <strong>the</strong> first state to move toward gay marriage, o<strong>the</strong>r states and <strong>the</strong><br />
Federal Government wrestled with <strong>the</strong> possibility that through <strong>the</strong> U.S. Constitution’s “full faith<br />
and credit” clause <strong>the</strong>y would be required to recognize same-sex marriages performed in<br />
Hawaii. In 1996, Congress adopted <strong>the</strong> federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) with votes of<br />
342 to 67 in <strong>the</strong> House and 85 to 14 in <strong>the</strong> Senate. DOMA was signed by President Clinton on<br />
Sept. 21, 1996. DOMA defined marriage for purposes of federal law. The “word ‘marriage’<br />
means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and <strong>the</strong> word<br />
‘spouse’ refers only to a person of <strong>the</strong> opposite sex who is a husband or a wife” (Advocate.com,<br />
2009; Goldberg, 1996; DOMA watch, 2008).<br />
In 1998, <strong>the</strong> Hawaiian movement toward same-sex marriage was rescinded when Hawaii<br />
and Alaska passed constitutional amendments supported by approximately 70% of <strong>the</strong> voters in<br />
each state to ensure that marriage could not be redefined by judges in <strong>the</strong> court systems<br />
(Daniels, 2000).<br />
Vermont Recognizes Gay Unions<br />
Vermont became <strong>the</strong> first state in <strong>the</strong> U.S. to recognize homosexual ‘unions’ in July of 2000<br />
when <strong>the</strong> Vermont Supreme Court required <strong>the</strong> Vermont legislature to ei<strong>the</strong>r grant marital<br />
status to homosexual couples or institute statewide domestic-partnership. By May of 2001<br />
<strong>Over</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Rainbow</strong>: The Gay Battle for Social Reorganization of America. 2010<br />
Dr. M. L. Coppock<br />
42 | P a g e