19.06.2015 Views

WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS - Cd3wd

WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS - Cd3wd

WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS - Cd3wd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2—Wind Characteristics 2–41<br />

Table 2.3. 1970 Wind Data<br />

Kansas City<br />

Dodge City<br />

u i x i m i p(u i ) F (u) y i m i p(u i ) F (u) y i<br />

1 0 300 0.103 0.103 -2.22 47 0.016 0.016 -4.12<br />

2 0.69 161 0.055 0.158 -1.765 0.002 0.018 -4.02<br />

3 1.10 127 0.044 0.202 -1.49 82 0.028 0.046 -3.05<br />

4 1.39 261 0.090 0.292 -1.06 65 0.022 0.068 -2.65<br />

5 1.61 188 0.065 0.356 -0.82 140 0.048 0.116 -2.09<br />

6 1.79 294 0.101 0.457 -0.49 219 0.075 0.92 -1.55<br />

7 1.95 151 0.052 0.509 -0.34 266 0.091 0.283 -1.10<br />

8 2.08 347 0.119 0.628 -0.01 276 0.095 0.378 -0.75<br />

9 2.20 125 0.043 0.671 0.11 198 0.068 0.446 -0.53<br />

10 2.30 376 0.129 0.800 0.48 314 0.108 0.554 -0.22<br />

11 2.40 67 0.023 0.823 0.55 155 0.053 0.607 -0.07<br />

12 2.48 207 0.071 0.894 0.81 177 0.061 0.668 0.10<br />

13 2.56 67 0.023 0.917 0.91 141 0.048 0.716 0.23<br />

14 2.64 91 0.031 0.948 1.09 142 0.049 0.765 0.37<br />

15 2.71 29 0.010 0.958 1.16 133 0.046 0.810 0.51<br />

16 2.77 51 0.017 0.976 1.32 96 0.033 0.843 0.62<br />

17 2.83 19 0.006 0.982 1.40 102 0.035 0.878 0.75<br />

18 2.89 39 0.013 0.996 1.70 101 0.035 0.913 0.89<br />

19 2.94 1 0 0.996 1.72 48 0.016 0.930 0.98<br />

20 3.00 7 0.002 0.999 1.89 78 0.027 0.956 1.14<br />

21 3.05 0 0 0.999 1.89 28 0.010 0.966 1.22<br />

22 3.09 2 0.001 0.999 1.97 21 0.007 0.973 1.29<br />

23 3.13 0 0 0.999 1.97 23 0.008 0.981 1.38<br />

24 3.18 1 0 1.000 2.08 12 0.004 0.985 1.44<br />

25 3.22 1 0 1.000 - 19 0.006 0.992 1.57<br />

26 3.26 0 0 8 0.003 0.995 1.65<br />

27 3.30 0 0 2 0.001 0.995 1.67<br />

28 3.33 0 0 9 0.003 0.998 1.85<br />

>28 0 0 5<br />

2912 2912<br />

We first use Eq. 22 to compute F (u i )foreachu i and Eqs 55 to compute y i for each F (u i ). These<br />

are listed in Table 2.3 as well as the original data.<br />

We are now ready to use Eqs. 58 and 56 to find a and b. First, however, we plot the point pairs<br />

(x i ,y i )foreachu i as shown in Fig. 18 for both sites. The readings for calm (0 and 1 knot) are assumed<br />

to be at 1 knot so that x i =lnu i is zero rather than negative infinity.<br />

Placing a straight edge along the sets of points shows the points to be in reasonable alignment<br />

except for calm and 2 knots for Kansas City, and calm for Dodge City. As mentioned earlier, the goal<br />

is to describe the data mathematically over the most common wind speeds. The Weibull function is<br />

zero for wind speed u equal to zero (if k>1) so the Weibull cannot describe calms. Therefore, it<br />

is desirable to ignore calms and perhaps 2 knots in order to get the best fit over the wind speeds of<br />

greater interest.<br />

Wind Energy Systems by Dr. Gary L. Johnson November 20, 2001

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!