19.06.2015 Views

Chalmers Finite Element Center - FEniCS Project

Chalmers Finite Element Center - FEniCS Project

Chalmers Finite Element Center - FEniCS Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10 PER HEINTZ<br />

6. Numerical examples<br />

In this section we present three numerical examples that demonstrate the crack propagation<br />

algorithm, implemented as described in the previous sections. First, we consider<br />

a simple model problem of a single edged crack for which we compute and compare the<br />

energy release rate with the analytical value. Secondly, a weak and a stiff inclusion problem<br />

are considered. The final example demonstrates a more complicated loading case, taken<br />

from the litterature, where a simply supported beam is subjected to a pointload.<br />

In all examples, the parameter α is chosen such that the normal tractions are evaluated<br />

from the uncracked element ahead of the cracktip. The parameter δ must be chosen high<br />

enough to ensure stability of the method. In all examples δ was set to δ = C · (2µ + 3λ)<br />

where C depends on the approximation order of the basis functions. For linear triangles<br />

C = 2 was sufficient in all examples. If the material properties are different between the<br />

last cracked element and the element ahead of the cracktip, we simply use the highest value<br />

obtained from the two different materials. For an in depth discussion and mathematical<br />

proofs concerning the choice of the parameter δ see [6], [8] and references therein. The<br />

elastic properties are given in terms of Youngs modulus E and poissons ratio ν and we use<br />

the relations<br />

Eν<br />

(6.1)<br />

λ =<br />

(1 + ν)(1 − 2ν)<br />

Eν<br />

(6.2)<br />

λ =<br />

1 − ν 2<br />

E<br />

(6.3)<br />

µ =<br />

2(1 + ν)<br />

where (6.1) and (6.2) are for plane strain and plain stress problems respectivily.<br />

In example 2 and 3 we use a simple mesh refinement algorithm to increase the accuracy<br />

of the computed kink angle. The elements that are marked with indicator 1, see Figure<br />

7, are subdivided into four new triangles in two steps. Thus the original elements with<br />

indicator 1 are subdivided into 16 new triangles. Due to the properties of the refinement<br />

algorithm, the refinement is diffused through the grid such that no hanging nodes and no<br />

sharp corners are obtained.<br />

6.1. Single edged crack. Consider the single edged crack in Figure 9 subjected to a<br />

modus I load with n · σ · n = σ 0 = 1. The body is in plane stress and the elastic<br />

parameters are E = 1.0 Pa and ν = 0.3. The dimensions of the body are W = 1.0 m and<br />

h = 2.0 m. The stress intensity factor K I , representing the strength of the singularity at<br />

the cracktip, is now obtained from<br />

(6.4)<br />

K I = √ πa · f(a,W),<br />

where f(a,W) is a geometry factor. The relation between the stress intensity and the<br />

energy release rate is<br />

(6.5)<br />

J = K2 I<br />

E

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!