Key findings from the 2009 New Zealand ... - Ministry of Health

Key findings from the 2009 New Zealand ... - Ministry of Health Key findings from the 2009 New Zealand ... - Ministry of Health

nzdoctor.co.nz
from nzdoctor.co.nz More from this publisher
19.06.2015 Views

Exposure to second-hand smoke at home in the past week, by neighbourhood deprivation Exposure to second-hand smoke exposure in the most deprived areas was over three times that in the least deprived areas (Figure 66). Figure 66: Exposure to second-hand smoke at home in the past week, among non-smokers aged 15–64 years, by NZDep2006 quintile, 2009 (age-standardised prevalence) 30 Percent 25 20 15 10 5 0 4.0 5.4 7.3 5.6 14.2 1 Least deprived 2 3 4 5 Most deprived NZDep2006 quintile Source: 2009 New Zealand Tobacco Use Survey Note: Age standardised to the WHO world population. Exposure to second-hand smoke at home in the past week in households with at least one child The 2009 NZTUS did not directly ask if children aged 0–14 years had been exposed to second-hand smoke at home in the past week. As a proxy for second-hand smoke exposure for children, the proportion of households where at least one resident (including the respondent) had smoked anywhere inside the house in the past week and that had at least one child aged 0–14 years living there has been used. It should be noted that as with any proxy measure, this indicator may under- or overestimate the true exposure of children to second-hand smoke. In 10.1% (8.5–11.7) of households with one or more children aged 0–14 years living there, at least one resident had smoked anywhere inside the house in the past week. 94 Tobacco Use in New Zealand

Exposure to second-hand smoke at home in the past week in households with at least one child, by respondents’ ethnic group Table 16 gives an indication of the prevalence of second-hand smoke exposure in homes with at least one child aged 0–14 years living there, by respondents’ ethnic group. Table 16: Exposure to second-hand smoke at home in the past week, households with at least one child aged 0–14 years, by respondents’ ethnic group, 2009 (unadjusted prevalence) Ethnic group Prevalence (95% CI) Number European/Other 8.9 (7.2–10.6) 70,600 Māori 21.3 (17.4–25.2) 39,000 Pacific 14.1 (8.8–19.4) 14,000 Asian 3.1 (1.1–6.7) 4100 Source: 2009 New Zealand Tobacco Use Survey Note: Total response ethnicity has been used. The households of Māori respondents with at least one child aged 0–14 years living with them, were significantly more likely to have had at least one resident smoke anywhere inside the house in the past week compared with the total population, after adjusting for age (Figure 67). Conversely, the households of European/Other and Asian respondents with at least one child living with them were significantly less likely to have had at least one resident smoke anywhere inside the house in the past week than the total population. There was no difference between the households of Pacific respondents with at least one child living with them and the total population in terms of the prevalence of having had at least one resident smoke anywhere inside the house in the past week. Tobacco Use in New Zealand 95

Exposure to second-hand smoke at home in <strong>the</strong> past week, by neighbourhood<br />

deprivation<br />

Exposure to second-hand smoke exposure in <strong>the</strong> most deprived areas was over three<br />

times that in <strong>the</strong> least deprived areas (Figure 66).<br />

Figure 66: Exposure to second-hand smoke at home in <strong>the</strong> past week, among non-smokers<br />

aged 15–64 years, by NZDep2006 quintile, <strong>2009</strong> (age-standardised prevalence)<br />

30<br />

Percent<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

4.0 5.4 7.3 5.6 14.2<br />

1<br />

Least deprived<br />

2 3 4 5<br />

Most deprived<br />

NZDep2006 quintile<br />

Source: <strong>2009</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Tobacco Use Survey<br />

Note: Age standardised to <strong>the</strong> WHO world population.<br />

Exposure to second-hand smoke at home in <strong>the</strong> past week in<br />

households with at least one child<br />

The <strong>2009</strong> NZTUS did not directly ask if children aged 0–14 years had been exposed to<br />

second-hand smoke at home in <strong>the</strong> past week. As a proxy for second-hand smoke<br />

exposure for children, <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> households where at least one resident<br />

(including <strong>the</strong> respondent) had smoked anywhere inside <strong>the</strong> house in <strong>the</strong> past week and<br />

that had at least one child aged 0–14 years living <strong>the</strong>re has been used.<br />

It should be noted that as with any proxy measure, this indicator may under- or<br />

overestimate <strong>the</strong> true exposure <strong>of</strong> children to second-hand smoke.<br />

In 10.1% (8.5–11.7) <strong>of</strong> households with one or more children aged 0–14 years living<br />

<strong>the</strong>re, at least one resident had smoked anywhere inside <strong>the</strong> house in <strong>the</strong> past week.<br />

94 Tobacco Use in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!