19.06.2015 Views

Better Sooner More Convenient Primary Care - New Zealand Doctor

Better Sooner More Convenient Primary Care - New Zealand Doctor

Better Sooner More Convenient Primary Care - New Zealand Doctor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Similarly Glendenning 12 observes that integration is more likely when the following are present:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

joint goals<br />

tight knit highly connected professional networks<br />

high degree of mutual trust<br />

joint arrangements which are part of „core business‟ rather than marginal integration at<br />

the edges<br />

joint arrangements covering operational and strategic issues and shared or single<br />

management arrangements.<br />

Degeling and Erskine 13 describe the importance of changing governance arrangements if true<br />

integration of services is to occur:<br />

“Efforts to establish and maintain networks [voluntary connections across<br />

organisational boundaries] are often purely rhetorical. …all too often tangible<br />

achievements on the ground are minimal …” (pg 35) … “Despite their membership in a<br />

network, for most network partners their employing organisation remains their primary<br />

affiliation.” (pg 36)<br />

“Put simply, effective joined-up “local-to-local” collaboration requires equivalent joinedup<br />

governance at the centre …” (pg 36)<br />

“… there is evidence showing how trust and network stability depend on the extent to<br />

which network partners (by way of contracts) have formalized what they can expect of<br />

each other and have established robust governance arrangements through which<br />

partners can be held to account. … These findings suggest that a network‟s<br />

effectiveness depends to a large extent on the degree to which its membership has<br />

been able to institutionalize both its internal operations and its independent existence<br />

from its sponsoring organisations.” (pg 37)<br />

“… the more that service settings (as between primary, acute, community and social<br />

services) are constituted as separate and distinct organisations, the more beliefs will<br />

differ about what should be done and who is best placed and equipped to do it. The<br />

“service gaps” than then result are unlikely to be resolved by, for example, “better<br />

networking”. Because the new service models for long-term conditions of necessity<br />

challenge the biases of existing approaches to service delivery in acute, community and<br />

social care settings, mere administrative solutions (such as the establishment of a<br />

network) are rarely able to produce what is required. Rather policy and funding<br />

authorities are likely to find that success will depend on the extent to which they have<br />

set in place new institutional arrangements and patterns of resource allocation … that<br />

will support the required forms of service integration between different service<br />

settings.” (pg 41)<br />

12 Glendenning, C (2002) „Breaking down barriers: integrating health and care services for older people in England‟,<br />

Health Policy 65: 139–151.<br />

13 Degeling P, Erskine J. Chapter 2. <strong>New</strong> models of long-term care and implications for service redesign. In Rechel B,<br />

Wright S, Edwards N, Dowdeswell B, McKee M. Investing in hospitals of the future. World Health Organisation, on<br />

behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Investing in hospitals of the future. 2009<br />

Business case EoI V38 AC 25Feb10 Page 40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!