18.06.2015 Views

Web-economic-crisis-health-systems-and-health-web

Web-economic-crisis-health-systems-and-health-web

Web-economic-crisis-health-systems-and-health-web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 1 | The impact of the <strong>crisis</strong> on the <strong>health</strong> system <strong>and</strong> <strong>health</strong> in Belgium<br />

23<br />

In 2001, a closed budget for pharmaceuticals was introduced. Between<br />

2001 <strong>and</strong> 2005, a clawback system 11 <strong>and</strong> other contributions were in place<br />

forcing pharmaceutical companies to contribute to the financing of public<br />

pharmaceutical spending. In 2006, a single system of contributions (called<br />

provisional funds) was installed, which was based on taxes on the turnover<br />

of reimbursed pharmaceuticals (9.73% in 2006, 8.73% in 2007, 7.73% in<br />

2008 <strong>and</strong> 2009, <strong>and</strong> 6.73% since 2010). Turnover taxes are reduced in some<br />

specific situations (e.g. if pharmaceutical companies have invested in research,<br />

development <strong>and</strong> innovation) or for specific pharmaceuticals, for example<br />

orphan drugs <strong>and</strong> drugs in category Cx (contraceptives <strong>and</strong> antispasmodics)<br />

(Gerkens & Merkur, 2010). The mechanism of provisional funds was<br />

abolished in 2008 <strong>and</strong> replaced by a similar system of contributions based on<br />

taxes on turnover, which are due in case of a budget overrun <strong>and</strong> cover up to<br />

€100 million. Additional taxes on the turnover of reimbursed pharmaceuticals<br />

have recently been implemented in response to the <strong>economic</strong> <strong>crisis</strong>. Examples<br />

are a "<strong>crisis</strong>" tax of 1% since 2010 <strong>and</strong> a tax of 0.13% since 2013 (European<br />

Observatory on Health Systems <strong>and</strong> Policies, 2014).<br />

Provider payment reforms<br />

Pharmacists<br />

A new remuneration system was introduced in April 2010, mainly to reinforce<br />

the intellectual role of pharmacists <strong>and</strong> partly to disconnect remuneration from<br />

drug prices. The system where pharmacists received a percentage (with a ceiling)<br />

of the retail price was replaced by a basic fee for intellectual services (a fixed sum<br />

per package for reimbursable drugs, equal to €4.16 since 1 January 2014), <strong>and</strong><br />

an <strong>economic</strong> margin (for ex-factory prices smaller than or equal to €60, this<br />

margin was 6.04% of the ex-factory price; for ex-factory prices above €60,<br />

the margin was €3.62, plus 2% of the difference between the ex-factory price<br />

<strong>and</strong> €60). A third part of the new remuneration system consists of some extra<br />

fees, for example for INN prescribing of drugs in the reference pricing system<br />

(€1.28 per delivery since 1 January 2014) <strong>and</strong> for advisory consultation services<br />

for new inhaled corticosteroids for asthma (€19.13 per talk; introduced on<br />

1 January 2014).<br />

GPs<br />

Although GPs are mainly paid on a FFS basis, the share of lump sum payments<br />

increased from 2.6% in 2000 to 20% in 2010 (Verzekeringswereld, 2011).<br />

Lump sum payments were introduced for managing the global medical file, for<br />

coordinating care in the DMPs for patients with type 2 diabetes <strong>and</strong> chronic<br />

11 If the sub-budget for pharmaceuticals is exceeded, pharmaceutical companies have to reimburse 65% (later increased<br />

to 72%) of the budgetary deficit. The remainder is paid by the sickness funds (Gerkens & Merkur, 2010).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!