18.06.2015 Views

Web-economic-crisis-health-systems-and-health-web

Web-economic-crisis-health-systems-and-health-web

Web-economic-crisis-health-systems-and-health-web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 1 | The impact of the <strong>crisis</strong> on the <strong>health</strong> system <strong>and</strong> <strong>health</strong> in Belgium<br />

19<br />

calendar year. The maximum share of co-payments as a proportion of total net<br />

taxable household income varies between 2.4% <strong>and</strong> 3.9%, except for the very<br />

poor (with a net taxable income below €11 500), where it can be larger than<br />

3.9%, <strong>and</strong> the very rich, where it can be smaller than 2.4%. The system has been<br />

exp<strong>and</strong>ed gradually since its introduction in 2002. For example, for chronically<br />

ill patients, some non-reimbursed painkillers were included in the calculation<br />

of the maximum billing ceiling. Since January 2009, the co-payment threshold<br />

has been reduced by €100 for individuals who have exceeded the limit of €450<br />

of co-payments for two consecutive years. These individuals are considered to<br />

be chronically ill.<br />

New status for patients with a chronic illness<br />

In September 2013, the status of "chronic illness" was adopted by the<br />

government. The status will be automatically assigned by the sickness funds to<br />

patients with at least €300 of <strong>health</strong> care expenses (not only OOP) for eight<br />

consecutive trimesters or who are entitled to the lump sum payment for the<br />

chronically ill (Dutch, zorgforfait; French, forfait de soins). 9 Patients suffering<br />

from a rare or orphan disease are also entitled to the new status. Patients<br />

with the status of having a chronic illness are automatically eligible for the<br />

lower maximum billing ceiling (as of 1 January 2013) <strong>and</strong> for third-party<br />

arrangements (as of 1 January 2015).<br />

Supplements<br />

While the system of maximum billing offers protection against the<br />

accumulation of co-payments to be paid, it does not include supplements (i.e.<br />

extra-billing above the officially agreed tariff). Supplements in the hospital<br />

sector are regulated <strong>and</strong> registered, but information on supplements charged<br />

in an ambulatory setting by doctors who have not signed the fee agreement is<br />

currently not available. However, a new law on transparency is in preparation<br />

that will require physicians <strong>and</strong> dentists to mention the exact amount (including<br />

supplements) that has been paid by a patient on the medical attestation to be<br />

submitted to the sickness fund.<br />

Hospitals <strong>and</strong> medical specialists can charge supplements on their fees, on the<br />

price of the room <strong>and</strong> on implants <strong>and</strong> medical devices. In the last few years,<br />

particularly since the onset of the <strong>crisis</strong>, the reimbursement level for implants<br />

<strong>and</strong> medical devices has increased. In addition, the fee <strong>and</strong> room supplements<br />

have increasingly been regulated, which is based on the room type. In 2010,<br />

supplementary charges for two-person hospital rooms were abolished. Since<br />

1 January 2013, patients in rooms with two or more people are almost fully<br />

protected against fee <strong>and</strong> room supplements. The only exception is the possibility<br />

9 Patients are entitled to this lump sum payment if the sum of their co-payments has exceeded a threshold in each of the<br />

two previous years <strong>and</strong> they can prove that they have lost their ability to live independently to a major extent.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!