Web-economic-crisis-health-systems-and-health-web
Web-economic-crisis-health-systems-and-health-web Web-economic-crisis-health-systems-and-health-web
Kazakhstan Ninel Kadyrova and Tata Chanturidze Economic trends • Although real per capita GDP growth slowed in 2008 and was slightly negative in 2009, Kazakhstan has been largely unaffected by the crisis. • Against the European trend, the unemployment rate has been decreasing. • Total government spending on health is among the lowest in the European region although there was a government budget surplus in every year of the 2008 to 2011 period. Public per capita health spending, which had grown every year with the exception of 2007, decreased slightly in 2011 (Kazakhstan: Fig. 1). Policy responses Kazakhstan Fig 2 gives the trends in per capita spending on health. Changes to public funding for the health system • Public spending on health more than doubled between 2007 and 2011. Changes to health coverage Population (entitlement) • No response reported. The benefits package • Highly specialized medical services, diagnostic care and screening added to the benefits package (2008–2012). • List of benefit population entitled to outpatient prescription medicines free of charge expanded (2011 onwards). • The essential list of drugs replaced with a formulary system based on cost– effectiveness criteria (2010). User charges • No response reported.
420 Economic crisis, health systems and health in Europe: country experience % Kazakhstan: Fig. 1 Economic and fiscal indicators 2000–2007 and 2008–2011 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 −5 −10 −15 −20 −25 −30 _ _ _ _ ● ● _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ● _ ● ● _ _ _ _ ● ● _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ● ● ● _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ● ● _ _ _ ● _ ● _ ● _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ● ● ● ● ● _ _ _ _ _ Year 2000−2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ● ● ● ● ● _ _ _ _ _ Real GDP per capita growth Deficit/surplus (% GDP) Government spending (% GDP) Government health spending (% total government spending) Notes: Deficit/surplus: World Bank; Other indicators: WHO Health for All. 10−year bond rates Unemployment rate Kazakhstan: Fig. 2 Trends in per capita spending on health, 2000–2011 300 Public spending per capita OOP spending per capita Non−OOP private spending per capita Per capita spending $, PPP 200 100 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 30 Growth % 20 10 0 −10 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Public spending per capita growth OOP spending per capita growth Note: Spending calculated from WHO Health for All. Non−OOP private spending per capita growth
- Page 402 and 403: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 404 and 405: Estonia Triin Habicht and Mall Lein
- Page 406 and 407: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 408 and 409: Finland Jan Klavus and Lauri Vuoren
- Page 410 and 411: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 412 and 413: France Karine Chevreul, Karen Berg
- Page 414 and 415: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 416 and 417: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 418 and 419: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 420 and 421: Germany Klaus-Dirk Henke and Wilm Q
- Page 422 and 423: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 424 and 425: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 426 and 427: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 428 and 429: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 430 and 431: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 432 and 433: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 434 and 435: Iceland Sigrún Gunnarsdóttir and
- Page 436 and 437: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 438 and 439: Ireland Anne Nolan and Steve Thomas
- Page 440 and 441: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 442 and 443: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 444 and 445: Israel Bruce Rosen and Amir Shmueli
- Page 446 and 447: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 448 and 449: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 450 and 451: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 454 and 455: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 456 and 457: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 458 and 459: Latvia Uldis Mitenbergs and Maris T
- Page 460 and 461: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 462 and 463: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 464 and 465: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 466 and 467: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 468 and 469: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 470 and 471: Malta Natasha Azzopardi Muscat Econ
- Page 472 and 473: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 474 and 475: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 476 and 477: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 478 and 479: Montenegro Ratka Knežević Economi
- Page 480 and 481: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 482 and 483: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 484 and 485: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 486 and 487: Norway Anne Karin Lindahl and Jon M
- Page 488 and 489: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 490 and 491: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 492 and 493: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 494 and 495: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 496 and 497: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 498 and 499: Country profiles of health system r
- Page 500 and 501: Country profiles of health system r
Kazakhstan<br />
Ninel Kadyrova <strong>and</strong> Tata Chanturidze<br />
Economic trends<br />
• Although real per capita GDP growth slowed in 2008 <strong>and</strong> was slightly<br />
negative in 2009, Kazakhstan has been largely unaffected by the <strong>crisis</strong>.<br />
• Against the European trend, the unemployment rate has been decreasing.<br />
• Total government spending on <strong>health</strong> is among the lowest in the European<br />
region although there was a government budget surplus in every year of<br />
the 2008 to 2011 period. Public per capita <strong>health</strong> spending, which had<br />
grown every year with the exception of 2007, decreased slightly in 2011<br />
(Kazakhstan: Fig. 1).<br />
Policy responses<br />
Kazakhstan Fig 2 gives the trends in per capita spending on <strong>health</strong>.<br />
Changes to public funding for the <strong>health</strong> system<br />
• Public spending on <strong>health</strong> more than doubled between 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2011.<br />
Changes to <strong>health</strong> coverage<br />
Population (entitlement)<br />
• No response reported.<br />
The benefits package<br />
• Highly specialized medical services, diagnostic care <strong>and</strong> screening added to<br />
the benefits package (2008–2012).<br />
• List of benefit population entitled to outpatient prescription medicines free of<br />
charge exp<strong>and</strong>ed (2011 onwards).<br />
• The essential list of drugs replaced with a formulary system based on cost–<br />
effectiveness criteria (2010).<br />
User charges<br />
• No response reported.