18.06.2015 Views

Web-economic-crisis-health-systems-and-health-web

Web-economic-crisis-health-systems-and-health-web

Web-economic-crisis-health-systems-and-health-web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 Economic <strong>crisis</strong>, <strong>health</strong> <strong>systems</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>health</strong> in Europe: country experience<br />

1. The nature <strong>and</strong> magnitude of the financial <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>economic</strong> <strong>crisis</strong><br />

1.1 The origins <strong>and</strong> immediate effects of the <strong>crisis</strong><br />

Several hypotheses exist for the triggers of the financial <strong>and</strong> <strong>economic</strong> <strong>crisis</strong><br />

in Europe. One hypothesis is that the main source was loose fiscal discipline:<br />

fiscal optimism led to <strong>economic</strong> overheating, which, in turn, led to wage <strong>and</strong><br />

price increases, reducing competitiveness <strong>and</strong> finally inducing an imbalance in<br />

the balance of payments. Another hypothesis is that the <strong>economic</strong> <strong>crisis</strong> was<br />

triggered by the <strong>crisis</strong> in the banking sector: increasing private sector expenditure<br />

was financed by the banking sector, but the credits were used suboptimally. In a<br />

context of low interest rates, consumers <strong>and</strong> companies consumed <strong>and</strong> invested<br />

upfront, speculating on future growth. At the same time, the banks did not<br />

manage the credit risk in a prudent way (Constâncio, 2013). However, the<br />

banking <strong>crisis</strong> was also partly a result of the global <strong>crisis</strong> in financial markets.<br />

1.2 Government responses to the <strong>crisis</strong><br />

A number of European banks had substantial balance sheet exposures to the<br />

housing market in the United States. Faced with losses on several of their assets,<br />

banks rebalanced their portfolios by increasing their holdings of so-called safe<br />

government bonds. However, in the meantime, some banks risked failure,<br />

forcing their governments to step in <strong>and</strong> recapitalize these banks to protect<br />

citizens' savings; this at a time when public finances were already under huge<br />

pressure because of the recession-induced collapse in tax revenues (Constâncio,<br />

2013). This also happened in Belgium. The Belgian Government made almost<br />

€21 billion of capital injections in the banking sector between 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2009<br />

(De Leeuw, 2010). In addition, the government guarantees the saving deposits<br />

of Belgian citizens up to €100 000 per person. Because of the imminent failure<br />

of several banks, the government decided to inject fresh capital into the sector,<br />

hoping for a recovery in the economy. The conditions imposed were mainly<br />

limited to (a higher) representation on the board of directors of the bank. The<br />

funds came from regular government receipts, collected through direct <strong>and</strong><br />

indirect taxes, capital taxes <strong>and</strong> non-fiscal receipts.<br />

1.3 Broader consequences: how well prepared was Belgium<br />

for an <strong>economic</strong> shock?<br />

The impact of the global financial <strong>crisis</strong> on Belgium's gross domestic product<br />

(GDP) was similar to the impact in other countries. The impact became<br />

apparent in mid-2008 <strong>and</strong> in the first semester of 2009, when the GDP per<br />

capita was 4% lower than the year before. The economy recovered slowly, <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!