Web-economic-crisis-health-systems-and-health-web

Web-economic-crisis-health-systems-and-health-web Web-economic-crisis-health-systems-and-health-web

dracinthiagep
from dracinthiagep More from this publisher
18.06.2015 Views

Chapter 3 | The impact of the crisis on the health system and health in France 95 All these elements illustrate the structural shortcomings hindering reforms as well as recent developments representing incremental change. While this sheds light on how the health system response to the crisis was more muted than it could have been, it is interesting to note major measures that were not taken because of the crisis. This was the case for the long-discussed and announced reform of long-term care financing. Despite the major challenge that long-term care represents and despite the fact that several concrete reform options were repeatedly debated (Chevreul & Berg Brigham, 2013), the Ministry of Health decided, in light of the crisis, not to initiate major long-term care financing reform. It must be wondered whether, in this case, the crisis represented an opportunity not to address a highly controversial policy issue. While this suggests that the crisis itself, on the one hand, represents a barrier to change, on the other hand, it may also be argued that it constitutes an opportunity for health reform. Indeed, one of the impacts of the crisis may be that long-standing issues affecting the French health system and some of the proposed solutions dating to the pre-crisis period seem to be receiving increasing attention in civil society. For example, the 2013 National Health Conference 13 has published a memorandum on "how to exit the crisis stronger than before" (Conférence nationale de santé, 2013) in which, among others, the following recommendations were made: • do whatever possible not to worsen health inequalities without abandoning the perspective of reducing them; • before any decision, make use of analyses of added value and improvement in the relative medical benefit; and • link financing solidarity with solidarity of care practice. Hence, although these points were well acknowledged by actors inside an "inner circle" before the crisis, they seem to be increasingly recognized in a wider arena. This may indicate that efforts for system reform are gaining momentum, albeit at a slow pace. Indeed, in September 2013, the Ministry of Health launched the National Health Strategy (stratégie nationale de santé). It aims to reshape the French health system from 2014 onwards, and is centred on three domains: (1) prevention and information, (2) health care system organization, and (3) patient rights. In its current phase, nationwide stakeholder consultations are organized by the regional health care agencies (Ministry of Work, Employment and Health, 2014). Although the National Health Strategy is not, as such, a response to the crisis, it is in part based on the recommendations of the National Health Conference and may be interpreted as using the window of opportunity opened by the economic downturn. 13 The National Health Conference (Conférence nationale de santé) was created as a permanent body by the 2004 Public Health Act; it brings together representatives of the health professions, health care facilities, regional health conferences and a number of additional experts to discuss and define health care priorities at the national level.

96 Economic crisis, health systems and health in Europe: country experience 5.4 Resilience in response to the crisis Midterm impact Overall, assessment of the system's resilience yields a dual picture. On the one hand, some elements at the macro and household level (such as household savings and universal coverage) have resulted in relatively mild effects on health system outcomes compared with those in other European countries. On the other hand, long-standing structural trends (outside and within the health system), in particular social and health inequities, combined with decreasing coverage scope (what is covered) and depth (how much of a benefit cost is covered) appear to have had effects, the full extent of which is yet to be seen. In fact, while in a number of European countries the crisis is nearing the end, the current situation leads to the presumption that, in France, "the worst may be to come" (Europe1, 2013). Indeed, a report by the National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies (Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques, 2014) stressed that the recession that France officially entered in 2009 is atypical in two ways compared with previous recessions: first, GDP in early 2013 remained below any level reached before the crisis and, second, the trade balance of manufactured goods remained at a negative level owing to the lack of competitiveness and exterior demand. For health system users, this protracted crisis seems to be accompanied by a series of recent phenomena that were perceived as marginal or even unknown before the onset of the crisis. For example, patients at present increasingly opt for low-cost VHI contracts, involving reduced coverage for so-called comfort benefits (e.g. a private room) and the necessity for advance payments at the point of service. In addition, the Internet has played an increasing role, not only as a means to obtain health information but also as a tool to save money when seeking health care (Pianezza, 2012). Further, medical tourism appears to have undergone a steep increase in popularity, with patients purchasing or acquiring consultations mainly from Belgium, Spain and Romania. 14 The number of French patients buying drugs (in person or online) abroad increased by three percentage points to 8% between 2012 and 2013, and the percentage of French patients consulting specialists abroad increased by one point to 4% between 2012 and 2013 (Sofinscope, 2014). Although these developments should be interpreted in the context of an increasing use of technology and cross-border services across all sectors of society, the data presented in this study raise the question of the extent to which the motivation may be financial rather than an indicator of zeitgeist. 14 Services purchased within the EU are covered by SHI at the amount that would be reimbursed if the service had been purchased in France, if (1) previous authorization was obtained or (2) it is recognized as emergency treatment. Otherwise, coverage is decided on a case-by-case basis. VHI generally follows the same mode of operation.

Chapter 3 | The impact of the <strong>crisis</strong> on the <strong>health</strong> system <strong>and</strong> <strong>health</strong> in France<br />

95<br />

All these elements illustrate the structural shortcomings hindering reforms as<br />

well as recent developments representing incremental change. While this sheds<br />

light on how the <strong>health</strong> system response to the <strong>crisis</strong> was more muted than it<br />

could have been, it is interesting to note major measures that were not taken<br />

because of the <strong>crisis</strong>. This was the case for the long-discussed <strong>and</strong> announced<br />

reform of long-term care financing. Despite the major challenge that long-term<br />

care represents <strong>and</strong> despite the fact that several concrete reform options were<br />

repeatedly debated (Chevreul & Berg Brigham, 2013), the Ministry of Health<br />

decided, in light of the <strong>crisis</strong>, not to initiate major long-term care financing<br />

reform. It must be wondered whether, in this case, the <strong>crisis</strong> represented an<br />

opportunity not to address a highly controversial policy issue.<br />

While this suggests that the <strong>crisis</strong> itself, on the one h<strong>and</strong>, represents a barrier<br />

to change, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, it may also be argued that it constitutes an<br />

opportunity for <strong>health</strong> reform. Indeed, one of the impacts of the <strong>crisis</strong> may<br />

be that long-st<strong>and</strong>ing issues affecting the French <strong>health</strong> system <strong>and</strong> some of<br />

the proposed solutions dating to the pre-<strong>crisis</strong> period seem to be receiving<br />

increasing attention in civil society. For example, the 2013 National Health<br />

Conference 13 has published a memor<strong>and</strong>um on "how to exit the <strong>crisis</strong> stronger<br />

than before" (Conférence nationale de santé, 2013) in which, among others,<br />

the following recommendations were made:<br />

• do whatever possible not to worsen <strong>health</strong> inequalities without ab<strong>and</strong>oning<br />

the perspective of reducing them;<br />

• before any decision, make use of analyses of added value <strong>and</strong> improvement<br />

in the relative medical benefit; <strong>and</strong><br />

• link financing solidarity with solidarity of care practice.<br />

Hence, although these points were well acknowledged by actors inside an "inner<br />

circle" before the <strong>crisis</strong>, they seem to be increasingly recognized in a wider arena.<br />

This may indicate that efforts for system reform are gaining momentum, albeit<br />

at a slow pace. Indeed, in September 2013, the Ministry of Health launched<br />

the National Health Strategy (stratégie nationale de santé). It aims to reshape<br />

the French <strong>health</strong> system from 2014 onwards, <strong>and</strong> is centred on three domains:<br />

(1) prevention <strong>and</strong> information, (2) <strong>health</strong> care system organization, <strong>and</strong> (3)<br />

patient rights. In its current phase, nationwide stakeholder consultations are<br />

organized by the regional <strong>health</strong> care agencies (Ministry of Work, Employment<br />

<strong>and</strong> Health, 2014). Although the National Health Strategy is not, as such,<br />

a response to the <strong>crisis</strong>, it is in part based on the recommendations of the<br />

National Health Conference <strong>and</strong> may be interpreted as using the window of<br />

opportunity opened by the <strong>economic</strong> downturn.<br />

13 The National Health Conference (Conférence nationale de santé) was created as a permanent body by the 2004 Public<br />

Health Act; it brings together representatives of the <strong>health</strong> professions, <strong>health</strong> care facilities, regional <strong>health</strong> conferences<br />

<strong>and</strong> a number of additional experts to discuss <strong>and</strong> define <strong>health</strong> care priorities at the national level.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!