Final_Judgment

735 Final Word? [637]
(and bitter) public relations campaign against President Clinton that the
major media in America picked up the lead and suddenly began trumpeting
the allegations about yet another Clinton "sexcapade."
Here were some basic facts (reported in the major media itself) that
somehow got buried in the midst of all the frenzy over the allegations that
were bandied about.
First of all, although the media focused on former White House staffer
Linda Tripp and her brassy New York promoter friend, Lucianne Goldberg,
as being the prime instigators of "Monica-gate," the Washington Post
pointed out rather circuitously in a story buried at the back of the paper on
January 28 that lawyers for Paula Jones the young woman who was suing
the president for sexual harassment] "first received several anonymous tips
that Lewinsky may have had a sexual relationship with the president."
It apparently wasn't apparently until after this that lawyers for Paula
Jones contacted Miss Lewinsky, tipping off the president that his
relationship with Lewinsky had been exposed.
We may assume that neither the aforementioned Tripp nor Goldberg
were the sources, inasmuch as they had other interests to exploit in the
Clinton-Lewinsky caper. In fact, Tripp instead went directly to Special
Prosecutor Kenneth Starr. Therefore, the big question was this: who tipped
off the lawyers for Paula Jones that there might be a "smoking gun" in the
president's relationship with Monica Lewinsky?
Monica Lewinsky was a Clinton loyalist and it was evidently not Miss
Lewinsky who leaked the story to the lawyers. So someone close to—or
spying on—the president's inner circle had to have leaked the word about
the president's relationship with Miss Lewinsky to Jones's attorneys.
Although Michael Isikoff of Newsweek (published by the Meyer-
Graham empire, which also owns the Washington Post) was the first
journalist officially "digging into" the story, it now turns out that, according
to the Post, reporting in passing on January 28, that one William Kristol—
described generally as "editor of the conservative Weekly Standard"—was
one of the first to "publicly mention" the allegations.
Kristol's role as being one of the "first" to float the story publicly, you
see, is critical to understanding the big picture. Not only is Kristol the front
man for billionaire media tycoon Rupert Murdoch—a major ally of Israel's
hard-line Likud—but Kristol himself is the son of journalist Irving Kristol
and historian Gertrude Himmelfarb, two self-styled "former Marxists" who
have emerged as "neo-conservative" figures with long-standing close ties to
Israel's "anti-communist right wing."
Young Kristol is, like his parents, a "Likudnik" and has been a harsh
critic of President Clinton's decision to "turn his back" on Israel. Also
significant is that Kristol, like Clinton, has been initiated into the Bilderberg
Group, the high-level elite foreign policy conclave dominated by the
Rockefeller and Rothschild families, although Kristol (obviously) is
identified with Bilderberg's "Republican" wing.
And on January 26, just as the Lewinsky affair began escalating and
engulfing Clinton, Kristol released a letter to Clinton, pressuring the