15.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

725 <strong>Final</strong> Word? [627]<br />

No American president was more concerned with<br />

the danger of nuclear proliferation than John<br />

Fitzgerald Kennedy. He was convinced that the spread<br />

of nuclear weapons would make the world more<br />

dangerous and undermine U.S. interests. He saw it as<br />

his role to place nuclear arms control and<br />

nonproliferation at the center of American foreign<br />

policy . . . Kennedy reminded his advisers that more<br />

was at stake than a piece of paper—without an<br />

agreement, the arms race would continue and nuclear<br />

weapons would proliferate to other countries. The only<br />

example Kennedy used to make the point was Israel.<br />

[Emphasis added by Michael Collins Piper]<br />

Carefully note Cohen's words: "The only example Kennedy used to<br />

make the point was Israel." Not the French or the Arabs. Only Israel.<br />

Cohen's book also makes it quite clear that the French—who had<br />

previously been the primary foreign enablers of Israel's secret nuclear arms<br />

program—had withdrawn their support after former French President<br />

Charles DeGaulle returned to power in 1958. Cohen writes on pages 73-74:<br />

By June DeGaulle had become aware of what he<br />

later termed "the improper military collaboration<br />

established between Tel Aviv and Paris after the Suez<br />

Expedition, which permanently placed Israelis at all<br />

levels of French services," and he was determined to<br />

end it. DeGaulle was taken aback when he learned of<br />

the unorthodox manner in which the relations were<br />

conducted . . . It took almost two years to translate<br />

DeGaulle's determination into a new French nuclear<br />

policy vis-à-vis Israel.<br />

Cohen points out, however, that Israel's friend in France, atomic energy<br />

minister Jacques Soustelle, resigned, and at that point DeGaulle learned that<br />

the French assistance to Israel had continued, despite his orders. Thus, in<br />

1960 "DeGaulle again demanded an end to this cooperation." Cohen adds:<br />

The French decision caused consternation in Ben-<br />

Gurion's inner circle. The end of French assistance<br />

would put the entire Dimona project at Risk.<br />

DeGaulle's decision was a sharp reversal from the<br />

written and unwritten obligations of his predecessors.<br />

. . . DeGaulle recognized how unprecedented the deal<br />

[between Israel and France] was, and for this reason<br />

refused to go along with it, reluctant to provide Israel<br />

with a nuclear option. France was trying to regain its<br />

position in the Arab world, and nuclear cooperation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!