Final_Judgment

709 Final Word? [611]
really mind them being "racist" as long as they support the ADL's
propaganda line as far as Israel is concerned.
Perhaps the ADL (which also opposes affirmative action, just like the
CCC) has a bigger agenda at work. After all, it's been known for years that
the FBI permitted its Ku Klux Klan informants to engage in anti-Black
behavior, but there was, at the same time, a long-standing order that they
could not criticize Jews or Israel. So that is very telling indeed.
Anyway, when the CCC's newspaper published a very brief review of
Final Judgment, the newspaper never once mentioned the fact that the book
links the Mossad to the JFK assassination, only hinting darkly about "other
agencies" aside from the Lansky syndicate that may have been involved.
Now here's the punchline: I've since learned that the CCC organizer
who set up the meeting where I spoke was almost certainly some sort of
intelligence operative—probably working for British intelligence— so that
raises questions about why I was invited to speak in the first place.
THE CURRENT MEDIA TWIST
The way the media has reported on the JFK case in recent years is
illustrated well by two similar reports published in the "conservative"
Washington Times on June 5, 1998 and the next day in the Times' "liberal"
counterpart in the nation's capital, the Washington Post.
The Times story, entitled "Garrison idea on accomplice was rejected by
Oswald widow," was written by longtime Warren Commission enthusiast
Hugh Aynesworth, now working for the Times. The story reported that a
79-page transcript of Mrs. Oswald's testimony in 1968 before a grand jury
convened by New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison had just been
released by the Assassinations Records Review Board in Washington and
that the transcript revealed that Mrs. Oswald believed that her husband
acted alone in the assassination.
The next day, on June 6, 1998, the Washington Post reported
essentially the same story under the headline, "Oswald's Widow Rejected
Conspiracy, Papers Show." The casual reader would conclude that Mrs.
Oswald accepted the Warren Commission's claim that her husband was
indeed JFK's assassin and that he acted alone.
Of the two newspaper accounts, however, the Post report was
technically the more honest. The concluding paragraph of the Post report let
the cat out of the bag: "Over the years, however, she changed her mind
about Oswald's guilt, eventually accepting conspiracy theories."
During that same time frame, Parade magazine piped in with the old
saw that organized crime was responsible for the JFK assassination. A press
release dated June 4, 1998 from Parade announced that "Bobby Kennedy
Believed the Mob Killed JFK," citing longtime RFK associate Jack
Newfield as the source.
Newfield, it will be recalled, penned the January 14, 1992 article in The
New York Post (illustrated in the photo section of Final Judgment) hyping