Final_Judgment

[610] Final Judgment 708
When I called the SPLC and then wrote them a letter advising them that
they had published several absolute lies about my actions and words that
day, I can assure you that they were particularly unnerved to learn that I had a
videotape of the event that proved what liars they were.
First of all, my bodyguard—my African-American friend—was not and
never was a member of the Nation of Islam and neither I nor he ever said he
was. In fact, my bodyguard was the father of a little boy who just happens
to be my godson. Secondly, although my bodyguard did wear sunglasses, it
was because he happens to have a chronic sleep which has made his eyes
vulnerable to bright lights. Thirdly, I never "instructed" the audience that I
was "not anti-black." In fact, it was another person at the meeting who used
those words and gestured to my bodyguard. It wasn't me at all. However,
the SPLC led its readers to believe my bodyguard was some sort of "Step-
N-Fetchit" who leered to the audience like a simple-minded Uncle Tom.
Finally, I did not grow progressively angrier as I spoke about "the Jews who
control Hollywood." In fact, I didn't really discuss the subject at all. As
the videotape of the event demonstrates, I did grow progressively angrier as I
discussed how self-styled JFK assassination researchers had tried to suppress
my book. However, when a member of the audience did make a comment about
Jewish influence in Hollywood, I passed by the comment, remarking with a
laugh, "You said that. I didn't." Perhaps not by coincidence, the person who
made the comment about Jewish influence in Hollywood emerged later as an
informant for the SPLC and the FBI.
However, the SPLC report was later posted on the Internet—for the
entire world to see—not only by the SPLC, but also by other parties who
had an interest in defaming me. What is interesting is that once I dared to
challenge the SPLC with the facts they quickly amended their allegations.
Quite rightly, the SPLC feared what would have been the obvious
circus that would have erupted had my bodyguard taken them to court in
Washington, D.C. where this self-styled "anti-racist" group would be forced
to explain to what would almost certainly be a majority Black jury why they
had maliciously abused an innocent African-American whose sole crime
was to act as a bodyguard for his friend (the godfather of his infant son)
who had previously been threatened by the Jewish Defense League.
What is particularly intriguing about this CCC event so falsely
memorialized by the SPLC is that one of the CCC's national leaders, Jared
Taylor, actually boycotted the event, evidently offended by my suggestions
that Israel and the CIA had done something unpleasant.
This didn't surprise me. In late August of 1993, I had been told by one
of Taylor's friends, Theodore J. O'Keefe, that once when he was visiting
Mr. Taylor and his wife at their home, the Taylors received a call from
Irwin Suall, then the "fact finding" director for the ADL. The average CCC
member should wonder why Taylor was receiving calls at his home from the
ADL, which otherwise trashes the average CCC member.
To sum it up: it appears to me that although the ADL does traffic
behind the scenes with people perceived to be "racists," the ADL doesn't