Final_Judgment

[592] Final Judgment 690
Constantly bedeviling me with "JFK-related questions" such as "Do
you think that mainstream historians are correct when they declare that the
Nazis slaughtered (plus or minus 5%) 6 million Jews?" he also made
references to the purported "skinheads" whom, he said, were the people
who found the thesis of Final Judgment believable. At one point he even
asked "I wonder exactly how many black and Jewish friends Mr. Piper has
in total" and actually expressed outrage that I refused to list them by name,
as though I should expose them to his defamations. Finally, though, I got so
frustrated that I broke down and told Harris that one of my two godsons
just happens to be an African-American child. He never responded to
THAT.
At one juncture, which just happened to be immediately after the
Columbine shooting, Harris attempted to link me to that tragedy, suggesting
the two disturbed young men had been inspired by evil "anti-Semites" like
me, not knowing at that point that the one shooter happened to be Jewish.
The constant and quite frenzied name-calling by Harris reached that
point that even one Jewish news group participant, Dave Reitzes—who was
no supporter of mine, by any means—even challenged Harris by pointing
out that criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitism.
Another news group participant, Keith Bruner, came to my defense in
defiance of Harris saying, "Piper does not claim to have indisputable proof
that the Mossad was involved, but he has drawn conclusions from certain
facts that certainly paint a believable picture of involvement by the Mossad"
and went on to say, "whether or not Piper is an [anti-Semite] he is pushing
his book and his conclusions and should be challenged from that
perspective," rather than by reckless name-calling.
In another posting, Bruner said, "Read his book, then attack him about his
conclusions and evidence he presents. Debate with him. Let's talk about the
murder of JFK" (rather than the Holocaust). Bruner added: "Any
information that will help lay the crime at the correct feet is good
information, even if comes from the devil."
The fact is that I sent Harris a complimentary copy of the book—
despite all his attacks on me—and yet he still never once posted any item
attempting to refute anything that I said in the book.
'TINY LITTLE ISRAEL WOULDN'T DO THAT!'
After I finally asked Harris directly: "Why do you believe that the
theory that the Mossad could have been involved in the JFK assassination is
`ludicrous' and 'outlandish' and 'nonsense,' etc?" he responded on April
10, 1999 by saying:
Even if Israel had wanted JFK dead, there was no
need for them to take the risk of actively participating
. . . if there was a slip-up and their participation was
exposed, Israel would have been virtually doomed.
They would have lost all credibility among civilized