Final_Judgment

681 Questions & Answers [585]
What created the buzz about possible Mossad involvement was the
report by both The New York Post and USA Today that Heymann was a
U.S.-Israeli dual citizen who said that he had told young Kennedy, some
years ago, that during the 1980s he (Heymann) had actually worked for the
Mossad. It was for this reason that Kennedy had approached Heymann
about doing a story for George on the Mossad—according to Heymann.
But while conspiracy theorists on the Internet and elsewhere focused on
the idea that JFK Jr. was about to "blow the whistle" on the Mossad, they
missed what was actually more significant: That the widely-publicized
claims of this Mossad figure were the primary media foundation for the
insistence Kennedy's death was an accident—either his fault or, effectively,
that of his wife Carolyn's—and one that was waiting to happen.
The New York Post headlined the Heymann story "John Jr. Feared
Flying Into Vineyard" and included Heymann's own detailed transcription
of their conversation. USA Today reported that Heymann claimed he took
extensive notes on his conversations with Kennedy for use in possible
future books. According to Heymann, JFK Jr. didn't feel secure about the
Martha's Vineyard airport; he didn't want to fly there; and he felt he had to
do it because his wife insisted he drop off her sister there before going on to
Hyannis airport.
The bottom line of the former Mossad man's story is that JFK Jr.
purportedly didn't feel comfortable about making two landings (at Martha's
Vineyard and then Hyannis), because—or so Heymann says Kennedy
said— "I'm really not that experienced a pilot."
So it just happened to be a self-described Mossad asset who was so
coincidentally well positioned to put forth a widely-publicized story which
played right into the media line that JFK Jr. shouldn't have been in the
pilot's seat to start with and that he was flirting with disaster: that the
tragedy was definitely an accident—almost an inevitability.
In fact, by The New York Post so carefully (and craftily) emphasizing
"the Mossad connection," the newspaper (which is a consistent voice for the
interests of Israel) was effectively telling the world: "This is what the
Mossad wants you to believe about JFK Jr.'s death. It was an accident. It
was JFK Jr.'s fault. It was an accident waiting to happen. Case closed."
Now, here's the punch line: Cindy Adams of The New York Post—who
first published Heymann's story—distanced herself from Heymann saying
she doubted his story. And investigative reporter Andrew Goldman of The
New York Observer published a devastating expose questioning whether
Heymann ever had any contact at all with JFK, Jr.
In fact, it appears that Kennedy hadn't even finalized his flight plans at
the time that Heymann claims he spoke to Kennedy. So the bottom line is
that Heymann's story was disinformation in the first place. Neither, Adams
nor Goldman, however, dared to suggest that Heymann's claims may have
been Mossad-sponsored disinformation.
The question thus remains: when this "former" Mossad agent put forth
this fraudulent story about the last days of JFK, Jr., was he doing it for his