15.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

665 Questions & Answers [569]<br />

Bilderberg Group (financed jointly by the Rockefeller and Rothschild<br />

families) and the Trilateral Commission. I've written extensively on both<br />

groups, including a widely circulated report on the Trilateral Commission.<br />

So it's conceivable that this secret committee that Coleman discusses does<br />

exist. But to the best of my knowledge Dr. Coleman has never exhibited any<br />

documentation that such a committee exists, although there is<br />

documentation about the Bilderberg Group.<br />

Frankly, I believe that getting involved in a debate over the so-called<br />

Committee of 300 is a distraction from the basics that people can<br />

understand: that CIA, the Mossad and Organized Crime all had distinct<br />

interests in removing JFK from office and that, as I demonstrate in <strong>Final</strong><br />

<strong>Judgment</strong>, all three groups closely intersected with one another in a number<br />

of areas and had the means and opportunity (not to mention, obviously, the<br />

motive) to have carried off the crime of the century and its cover-up.<br />

These are all interests that are apparent—that can be documented—and<br />

which people do readily understand. Introducing some shadowy Committee<br />

of 300 into the equation takes the JFK assassination out of the realm of<br />

average understanding and does nothing to address the immediate issue.<br />

I am familiar with Dr. Coleman's work and find it quite fascinating.<br />

However, I do have to state specifically that in his report on the JFK<br />

assassination, which I acknowledged earlier, I am sorry to say that Coleman<br />

made some misstatements of fact that detract from his credibility.<br />

For example, he states that if one of New Orleans District Attorney Jim<br />

Garrison's key witnesses against Clay Shaw, one Perry Raymond Russo,<br />

had been permitted to testify before the grand jury that this would have<br />

blown the JFK case wide open. In fact, Russo did testify and it was his<br />

testimony that led to Shaw's indictment. Coleman suggests that Garrison's<br />

prosecution of Shaw was halted before it ever reached a grand jury<br />

indictment. This just is not true and this is an error that could cause people<br />

to doubt his credibility, considering that this is a basic fact that is very well<br />

known. In addition, Coleman says that Russo left for California before his<br />

testimony was ever heard. This didn't happen. What happened was that<br />

people who were trying to sabotage Garrison's investigation offered Russo a<br />

job in California, but he turned them down flat and exposed them to<br />

Garrison who brought indictments for witness tampering against them! So<br />

again Coleman is mistaken here.<br />

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> never once mentions evidence that on the famous<br />

Zapruder film of the assassination there is visible proof that President<br />

Kennedy's Secret Service chauffer, William Greer, turned around and<br />

fired the fatal head shot at JFK using a pistol. This pistol is clearly<br />

visible on the Zapruder film and has been widely shown around the<br />

world. How could you ignore this vital evidence? Are you trying to<br />

cover up the truth that so many people now know?<br />

I think the allegation that William Greer fired the fatal head shot is not<br />

only one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard, but also an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!