15.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

663 Questions & Answers [567]<br />

The Lyndon LaRouche organization has done outstanding work in<br />

studying the role of the British Crown in attempting to undermine American<br />

sovereignty. They've issued a report entitled Why the British Kill U.S.<br />

Presidents and in that work, along with Dope, Inc. (which I did cite in <strong>Final</strong><br />

<strong>Judgment</strong>) they outline the British intelligence connections of people such<br />

as, for example, Colonel Louis M. Bloomfield, the chief executive officer of<br />

the Permindex company, along with New Orleans trade executive Clay<br />

Shaw, an Anglophile of long-standing.<br />

I do not dispute these connections. However, as much respect as I have for<br />

the work of the LaRouche people (all of which I find quite valuable), I do<br />

not believe that they have pursued the Israeli connection far enough. But they<br />

certainly do highlight it in their research.<br />

The LaRouche group suggests that the Mossad is an arm of the British<br />

Crown. I don't buy that argument, but at the same time I don't feel I have<br />

enough information to dispute it. However, I do believe there are firm<br />

grounds to say that the Mossad, on its own, as an arm of the Israeli<br />

government, had good reason (in its view) to participate in the JFK<br />

assassination conspiracy precisely because of JFK's behind-the-scenes<br />

conflict with Israel. So if the British did indeed want JFK out of the White<br />

House and if they did utilize elements in the CIA and the Mossad and<br />

Organized Crime to carry out the crime, they certainly had willing<br />

participants who had reason on their own to participate, whether or not the<br />

order came from Queen Elizabeth.<br />

I don't always agree with the interpretations of the LaRouche<br />

organization, but their research is always worth examining on a wide variety<br />

of matters. I will point out that several other JFK researchers have relied<br />

upon LaRouche writings as part of their own research: Jim Marrs cites the<br />

LaRouche efforts in Crossfire, James DiEugenio cites them in Destiny<br />

Betrayed and even Oliver Stone himself in his published script of the film<br />

JFK (including commentary and annotation) cites the LaRouche<br />

organization for some of the material relating to Permindex. So if anyone<br />

wants to score me for using LaRouche material as a source, they better be<br />

prepared to do the same regarding these other "responsible" researchers.<br />

What about the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)? Weren't<br />

many CFR members also on the Warren Commission? The CFR is one<br />

of the most important Establishment power groups. How could you fail<br />

to mention the CFR? They probably ordered the assassination of JFK.<br />

There were CFR members on the Warren Commission. There's no<br />

doubt about the fact that the CFR is an important arm of the Establishment.<br />

Some would even call it THE Establishment in this country. It's financed<br />

largely by the Rockefeller interests and their corporate allies. It's an<br />

exclusive foreign policy pressure group that has staffed virtually every key<br />

post in every presidential administration since Herbert Hoover—even<br />

including the JFK administration. And, perhaps more importantly, CFR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!