Final_Judgment

[566] Final Judgment 662
know by what basis one determines which source is reliable and which
isn't. Needless to say, I don't think Marrs is doing Gary Wean justice.
It is interesting that the media has continually used the Monroe affair
and other alleged affairs to downgrade JFK's reputation. Even Jacqueline
Kennedy Onassis was trashed by the media in the wake of her husband's
death and her re-marriage to Aristotle Onassis. That marriage was presented
as something less than savory.
On the other hand, although Jacqueline had a ten-year live-in
adulterous relationship with a married man, Belgian-born Jewish diamond
merchant Maurice Tempelsman, that was quietly and carefully kept under
wraps during that decade. Only after her death was it generally mentioned
(and then only in passing) that the two had been living together and
Tempelsman was painted as nothing less than a saint.
This might have something to do with the fact that Tempelsman had
long-standing ties to the CIA and the Mossad as a result of his ventures in
Africa where both intelligence agencies have played a major role in recent
years. So the media didn't raise too many eyebrows about the Widow's
affair with Tempelsman.
Why don't you bring up the role of the Masons in the JFK
assassination and cover-up? Isn't it true that all of the members of the
Warren Commission were Masons?
I don't know if all of the Warren Commission members were Masons.
However, some, notably Michael A. Hoffman II, a very brilliant researcher,
have demonstrated quite a bit of Masonic imagery in events surrounding the
assassination. I don't dispute that. It's likely there was high-level Masonic
support for the assassination, particularly since JFK was a Catholic.
Zionism and Freemasonry are both heartily anti-Catholic and do overlap in
many areas of intrigue. No question about it. To understand the
assassination in its most basic form, we need only look at JFK's conflicts
with Israel, Organized Crime and the CIA. That says it all.
The loudest advocate of the proposition that I should blame the Masons
was a character who viciously attacked one of my sources, Gary Wean, and
after attacking Wean, later launched an Internet campaign to defame me as
well. This character, among other things, says that my "real" name is
"Bernard" Piper—not true—and that JFK never had any extramarital
affairs. (Seriously.) Well, considering all of this, it's interesting to note that
this character revealed to me in a letter that he was related to Ferenc Nagy,
the Hungarian who was involved in Israel's Permindex operation which was
most definitively an element in the JFK conspiracy. So this perhaps
explains, at least in part, this character's ventilations.
Why don't you report the role of the British Crown in the JFK
assassination?