15.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

[554] <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> 650<br />

George Bush could probably be indicted and convicted for any number<br />

of crimes, but conspiracy in the JFK assassination is not likely one of them.<br />

The full story of George Bush and his record of CIA intrigue has yet to be<br />

told—and, unfortunately, will probably never be told—but I felt that, for the<br />

record, it would be appropriate to explore Bush's possible ties to the<br />

assassination in the pages of <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong>.<br />

And just for the record, I'd like to throw out my own little theory about<br />

Bush's connection to the JFK affair. This is sure to be controversial and I<br />

don't have any evidence to prove it, but I'll put it on the table for others to<br />

think about. Although most JFK assassination researchers are convinced<br />

that the mysterious CIA figure "Maurice Bishop" (once purportedly seen in<br />

Texas in the company of Lee Harvey Oswald) was actually longtime CIA<br />

figure David Atlee Phillips, I have personally always felt that the famous<br />

sketch of "Bishop" which many say has a strong resemblance to Phillips,<br />

could just as easily be George Bush.<br />

And if you compare photos of Bush and Phillips, it's conceivable that some<br />

might find the two to have a similar appearance. Is it at all possible that<br />

"Maurice Bishop" was really a George Bush CIA code name during<br />

Bush's CIA intrigue with the Cubans around the time of the JFK<br />

assassination? Is it possible that the code name "Maurice Bishop" was<br />

actually used by several people, Bush being among them? Is it possible that<br />

since David Atlee Phillips was known as a CIA figure that the CIA floated<br />

the story that Phillips was really "Bishop" so as to keep Bush's CIA<br />

connection deep cover? As I say, this is all pure speculation and I'm not<br />

suggesting that there's any evidence to prove it. However . . .<br />

Long before the publication of Mark Lane's book, Plausible Denial<br />

(not to mention the story in The Spotlight that sparked the libel suit by<br />

former CIA man E. Howard Hunt that is described in Lane's book),<br />

there was a lot of speculation that Hunt was involved in the JFK<br />

assassination and that he may have been one of the famous "tramps"<br />

photographed in Dealey Plaza shortly after the president's murder. Do<br />

you think Hunt was one of those tramps or that those "tramps" were<br />

involved in the assassination conspiracy?<br />

First of all, I am very familiar with all of the research and writing<br />

regarding the so-called "tramps." However, I am not convinced that E.<br />

Howard Hunt was one of those tramps. I have even seen another picture,<br />

published in one of the tabloids, that purports to show Hunt picking up a<br />

bullet in Dealey Plaza immediately after the assassination. (If anything the<br />

individual which is supposed to be Hunt looks more like former President<br />

Gerald Ford who served on the Warren Commission and I don't think that it<br />

was Ford.) Hunt is a suspicious character and he was mixed up in the<br />

intrigue surrounding the assassination as Plausible Denial and <strong>Final</strong><br />

<strong>Judgment</strong> together prove. The book Coup d'Etat in America by A. J.<br />

Weberman and Michael Canfield alleges that Hunt was one of the tramps,<br />

but, as I say, I don't believe it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!