Final_Judgment

[540] Final Judgment 636
I do believe that there is strong evidence, which has appeared in more
than one book on the JFK assassination, that there were people posing as
Lee Harvey Oswald. However, it seems unlikely that those imposters knew
that they were doing so for the purpose of furthering an aspect of the
assassination conspiracy. The assassination conspiracy would be far too
compartmentalized for every participant in some aspect of the conspiracy to
know precisely how he was being manipulated or utilized in the framing of
Oswald. Some of those imposters probably never laid their eyes on Oswald
and probably didn't know who he was until after the real Oswald was
picked up by the Dallas police.
In Final Judgment I believe that I broke serious new ground by
pointing out that Oswald's association with Guy Banister may indeed point
to a possible role by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith (an arm
of Israel's Mossad) in the "sheep-dipping" of Oswald as a "pro-Castro
agitator." In light of Banister's close relationship with A. L. (Bee) Botnick
of the New Orleans office of the ADL, we have to seriously ponder the
question of whether or not Banister's use of Oswald had been arranged by
the ADL which frequently contracted out "fact finding" work through
private detective agencies such as that of Banister's in New Orleans.
This is something that we should address. Although Banister's
historical profile is one of a "right-wing anti-communist racist extremist"
etc etc (a profile that the "liberal" JFK assassination researchers like to
portray), the fact is that Banister worked closely with the New Orleans ADL
office. By all accounts, A. L. Botnick was an "anti-communist extremist"
with a known hostility toward the Black civil rights movement, the ADL's
public posturing as a "civil rights" group notwithstanding.
Although Botnick himself was not in the New Orleans ADL office in
1963 (having transferred to its Atlanta office, later returning to New Orleans
in 1963), Banister certainly retained his very valuable ties to the ADL.
My own feeling about Oswald's "sheep-dipping" by Banister is that
Banister's ADL associates were looking into left-wing groups such as the
Fair Play for Cuba Committee and upon this basis they could have deployed
Oswald into the pro-Castro movement, part of a deliberate attempt to
portray Oswald as a Castroite. That is, Oswald thought that he was working
for Banister when, in fact, he was acting as a "fact finder" for the ADL.
Banister himself may have been told that the ADL wanted "facts" about
the pro-Castro movement and that Oswald was the man for the job. Banister
himself may not have even known that Oswald was being sheep-dipped for
his ultimate role in the Kennedy assassination. So it may have come as a
surprise to Banister himself when Oswald was named as the assassin.
In retrospect I don't think that Banister himself was as central to the
actual assassination conspiracy, in this regard, as many have believed over
the years. Banister himself was, in that sense, a "useful idiot" in the employ
of the ADL and the Mossad and its CIA allies. I would even go so far as to
say that it seems likely that even Banister's friends at the ADL had no idea
that Oswald was being slated for the role of patsy in the assassination.