Final_Judgment

[536] Final Judgment 632
according to Ostrovsky there is what one might call an assassinations
"board of directors" within the Mossad and no assassination can be
orchestrated by the Mossad without a formal vote of approval by this board.
There's another important thing to remember here: it is highly unlikely
that the Mossad—at least at that juncture in history—would have ever
considered killing the president of the United States unless it knew that it
had the institutional consent of the CIA, at the very least. Israel's position
was highly precarious in 1963 and for the Mossad—or even so-called
"rogue elements" of the Mossad—to attempt the assassination of the
American president without the assurance that it had the support of the CIA,
for example, would have been a rash move indeed. So there were no
"rogue" Mossad elements involved in the assassination of JFK.
At this juncture, I suppose, it's appropriate to comment further on
James Jesus Angleton. Although there is no question that, by personal
choice (for whatever reason), Angleton was a devout friend of Zionism and
the state of Israel and that he used all resources at his command to influence
CIA decision-making on Israel's behalf.
Whether he was blackmailed or not, however, the fact remains that
Angleton was Israel's primary advocate at the CIA. He was a powerful,
secretive man who was also a key player in much of the CIA's worldwide
intrigue in a variety of areas where he dealt on a close and sustained basis
with figures tied, in turn, to the Mossad and to the Lansky Crime Syndicate.
Angleton was no "rogue." He was the CIA's most influential—if
controversial—spymaster and one of the most remarkable characters in the
bizarre and fascinating history of that agency. And he was also one of those
individuals most directly responsible for initiating and orchestrating the
assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
Where do the anti-Castro Cuban exiles fit in the JFK conspiracy?
The Cubans were at the bottom rung of the ladder. They were low-level
functionaries, perhaps the lowest of all. There may have actually been a
Cuban who pulled a trigger in Dallas. Former CIA contract operative Marita
Lorenz (who went to Dallas with a caravan of Cubans arriving just prior to
the assassination) has pointed out that she was told by her CIA handler in
Dallas that she was supposed to function as a "decoy" and it seems likely to
me that many of the Cubans who were enmeshed in the assassination
scenario were acting as such. The Cubans have proven to be an excellent
"false flag" for the real conspirators for there were many false trails being
laid to make it appear as though the chosen patsy, Lee Harvey Oswald, was
a "pro-Castro agitator." Who better to be positioned to manipulate Oswald
in that fashion and play the part in framing Oswald than the anti-Castro
Cubans who would obviously see the benefit in such a measure?
As I point out in Final Judgment, long-time CIA contract operative
Jerry Patrick Hemming who was close to the anti-Castro Cubans has said
that the Cubans were being manipulated themselves and that they have
come to realize that. I contend, of course, that they were being manipulated
by the CIA and the Mossad who were leading the Cubans to believe that