15.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

631 Questions & Answers [535]<br />

Angleton, the CIA's director for counterintelligence. These are not "low<br />

level" operatives who went astray. These are men at the top. There's no<br />

question about it. What about somebody such as E. Howard Hunt?<br />

Although Hunt was certainly lower on the CIA totem pole than Phillips or<br />

Angleton, he was still very much a long-time CIA figure who had played a<br />

major role in the CIA's clandestine affairs. Hunt, likewise, was no "rogue"<br />

operative.<br />

There is no evidence that John McCone—a longtime Kennedy family<br />

friend—who was JFK's appointee as CIA director (replacing Allen Dulles,<br />

who had been fired by JFK), had anything to do with the conspiracy. In fact,<br />

as noted in <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong>, McCone himself was a bitter critic of Israel's<br />

nuclear bomb program and earlier, at the close of the Eisenhower<br />

administration where he was a member of the Atomic Energy Commission,<br />

it was McCone who first leaked the truth about Israel's nuclear intentions.<br />

It's interesting to note that when the Kennedy administration ordered<br />

the CIA to begin spying on Israel's secret nuclear development program, the<br />

spying was being done out of McCone's office. In other words, JFK did not<br />

trust the spying operation to be conducted by Angleton, whom everyone<br />

knew was a co-opted agent of Israel in the CIA, but JFK did trust McCone.<br />

So although McCone had nothing to do with JFK's assassination, those who<br />

surrounded him at the highest levels certainly did.<br />

Nor should one forget that many of the people in the CIA at the time of<br />

the JFK murder remained loyal to long-time director Allen Dulles who had<br />

been sacked by Kennedy. The CIA's involvement in the assassination was<br />

very much an institutional response to JFK who had threatened to splinter<br />

the CIA and cast it to the winds.<br />

All of this is not to suggest that there was a general staff meeting at the<br />

CIA one day when John McCone was out with a head cold where Angleton<br />

announced, "We're going to kill the president. Let's work together on this<br />

and keep Mr. McCone out of the loop." Things don't work that way. The<br />

actual conspirators in the loop were a tightly-knit group with vast resources<br />

at their command, including not just the CIA bureaucracy and its infamous<br />

black budget, but they also had the skills of the Mossad network on call.<br />

What's more, with the CIA's inter-action with peripheral groups such<br />

as the anti-Castro Cuban exiles, not to mention contacts in organized crime,<br />

there were enough people who could be manipulated in enough ways that<br />

they wouldn't even necessarily know that they were being<br />

manipulated—and implicated. And once those people were implicated, it<br />

was in their interests to not only shut up, but help cover up. There were<br />

undoubtedly many people in the CIA and elsewhere who were involved in<br />

some aspect of the conspiracy who had no idea that they were being used to<br />

achieve the ultimate goal of eliminating JFK.<br />

As far as the Mossad is concerned, Mossad operatives could not have<br />

acted without the direct orders of Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion and<br />

Mossad assassinations chief Yitzhak Shamir. The Mossad is actually a very<br />

small organization institutionally, as former Mossad operative Victor<br />

Ostrovsky has pointed out. It is even more tightly knit than the CIA. In fact,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!