Final_Judgment

[526] Final Judgment 622
]
for people at much higher levels. What does matter is who ultimately
planned the assassination. This is what really matters.
Why don't you ever address such issues as where the shots were
fired from or where the shots hit or what kind of bullets or weapons
were used? Don't these elements, taken together, help solve the JFK
assassination mystery?
The bottom line is: "Who killed John F. Kennedy and why?" In Final
Judgment I quoted long-time JFK assassination researcher Vincent
Salandria who said: "While the researchers have involved themselves in
consuming preoccupation with the microanalytic searching for facts of how
the assassination was accomplished, there has been almost no systematic
thinking on why President Kennedy was killed." I think that this
summarizes it quite well.
John F. Kennedy died that day in Dallas. As a direct consequence of his
death, U.S. foreign policy not only changed vis-à-vis Vietnam, but it also
did a 180-degree turn in the realm of American policy toward Israel and the
Arab world. I think that the big problem with many JFK assassination
researchers is that they have failed to look in the direction of the Middle
East controversy and that is a major problem they have failed to overcome.
Those who are responsible for the murder of John F. Kennedy find
nothing more amusing than the spectacle of "serious researchers" tripping
over one another and rehashing second, third and fourth-hand information,
trying to determine where shots came from thirty years after the crime took
place. This does nothing to resolve the controversy.
Mark Lane proved in Rush to Judgment that there was much more to
the story and subsequent books such as, notably, Josiah Thompson's Six
Seconds in Dallas, analyzed the forensic aspects in a convincing fashion.
However the question of conspiracy and cover-up was no longer in doubt
after such volumes appeared.
Therefore we've known for thirty years that there was a conspiracy,
that multiple assassins were involved. It doesn't matter how they carried out
the crime, in the end, since the crime was a success. The weapons used in
the crime have never been found and much of the autopsy and ballistic
evidence that does exist may itself be forgeries. We are not likely to ever
find a "smoking gun" that was bought by a known Mossad assassin either.
So let's get away from trying to answer questions that will never be
answered and start looking into the connections of those who have been
implicated in the conspiracy in some fashion or another: Clay Shaw, David
Ferrie, Guy Banister, Carlos Marcello, Santo Trafficante, the French
assassins and many others. When we look into the connections of these
well-known names, as I did in Final Judgment, you cannot help but keep
tripping over the Israeli Connection. It is a connection that is ever-present.
Why didn't anyone ever come across the Israeli connection to the
JFK assassination before the publication of Final Judgment?