15.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

[516] <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> 612<br />

By anyone's standards, of the 111 volumes referenced in the<br />

bibliography of the third edition of <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong>, at least 85% of those<br />

sources were from "mainstream" or "major" publishers. Additionally,<br />

roughly 73% of the references cited didn't even have anything to do with<br />

the JFK assassination itself.<br />

By my count, only 2% of the sources cited in the third edition came<br />

from "pro-Arab" publishing houses. What's more, as I have noted in <strong>Final</strong><br />

<strong>Judgment</strong>, my primary sources on JFK's struggle with Israel come from<br />

sources such as Seymour Hersh, Stephen Green and Andrew and Leslie<br />

Cockburn, none of whom can be described as extremists in any way.<br />

Only 7% of the sources referenced in the bibliography of the third<br />

edition could be clearly cited as being from sources that are "right wing" in<br />

nature and one of those sources—the memoirs of former American Nazi Party<br />

leader George Lincoln Rockwell—is cited in the bibliography only because I<br />

make passing reference to the fact that Rockwell dedicated his book to a<br />

gentleman, DeWest Hooker, who is quoted in <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong>.<br />

The Rockwell book was referenced in the bibliography only for the<br />

record and is not provided as "proof' or "evidence" of Israel's involvement<br />

in the JFK assassination. So please, critics, don't try to cite Rockwell as one<br />

of my sources. By so doing you will only demonstrate how determined you<br />

are to try to discredit my theory in any way possible.<br />

One effort to discredit my research falls flat if you look at the facts.<br />

Take a look at the trick that Richard Morrock of Bay Terrace, New York<br />

played on people when he wrote a letter to Steamshovel Press (which was<br />

published without comment) in which he claimed that "about a third" of the<br />

sources cited in <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> came from publications of the Lyndon<br />

LaRouche organization. In fact, of the 746 citations appearing in the third<br />

edition of <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong>, only 30 of them—four percent—came from<br />

LaRouche sources and most of them were passing historical references that<br />

didn't even touch on the actual thesis of <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> itself. And for the<br />

record, here's an analysis of the LaRouche citations.<br />

Eight (that is 27%) of the 30 notes citing LaRouche publications<br />

were passing references to the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith and<br />

its connections to a number of bankers with ties to the Lansky syndicate,<br />

etc. Only one of these ADL references had anything even directly to do with<br />

the JFK assassination per se: the fact that New Orleans intelligence<br />

operative Guy Banister was close to the ADL's self-described "super<br />

communist hunter" A. I. Botnick.<br />

Four of the LaRouche citation footnotes (13% of the total) appeared<br />

in two appendices (in the third edition) which were supplemental in nature<br />

and not central to the basic thesis of the book. (One of the appendices in<br />

question, the one dealing with the strange activities of government<br />

informant Roy Frankhauser, was added for the first time when the third<br />

edition of <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> was published.)<br />

Two notes were biographical details about Rabbi Tibor Rosenbaum<br />

and one was about an Israeli banker who served on the board of<br />

Rosenbaum's Banque De Credit International.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!