Final_Judgment

536 The Continuing Cover-Up [439]
forth and prove me wrong—to show me where the conclusions reached in
Final Judgment were unsound.
Of this vast array of individuals invited to debate only General Pritikin had
responded as of January 1, 1998. Pritikin's lengthy letter said that "Every
statement in your book can be refuted, but I am not the one to do it." 1098
Pritikin told me that General Mark Clark said that "I wouldn't be surprised if
thirty or forty years after the assassination of John F. Kennedy books will
come out blaming the Jews." 1099
"Your book" wrote Pritikin, "along with the writings of Grace Halsell and
George Ball (who had a long record of treason) are considered [by the Arabs]
the tryptych for the destruction of the USA and the extermination of the
American people." 1100
(Grace Halsell is a longtime and respected professional journalist of
liberal inclinations who has written somewhat critically of Israel. Former
Undersecretary of State George Ball is guilty of the same crime. Evidently
Halsell, Ball and I are guilty of crimes of the same magnitude as far as
General Pritikin is concerned.)
"You state in your letter," wrote Pritikin, "that no one has come
forward to refute the allegations in your book. This is due to the fact that it
has no index. It is written in the style of Victor Hugo and Alexander
Dumas. It reads like a beautiful, fictional novel because it has no index.
That is why no one has come forward to refute anything. "1101 (The first two
editions of Final Judgment were not indexed.]
Pritikin continued: "The discovery of oil in the Arabian Peninsula in
the 1930s brought about the downfall of free western civilization, because
the USA failed to have the foresight, the courage and the adamant will to
combat the oil rich sheiks, and because we had traitors like Michael Collins
Piper, Grace Halsell and George Ball." 1102
PRITIKIN'S 'PROOF'
In his letter General Pritikin cited the presence of a lovely memorial in
Israel to John F. Kennedy as "proof' that the Israelis loved JFK more than
any other American president.
This is scant "proof' indeed—of nothing. A cynic might be so crass as
to suggest that the memorial was nothing more than a tribute by the Israelis
to one of their own more outrageous public executions and the skill with
which it was conducted.
Lest, however, that some pro-Israel zealot claim that this is my
contention, for the record I will say that it is not. What I am saying is that
such a memorial proves nothing: Only that the Mossad-dominated Israeli
establishment wants to have it on the record—although the facts show
otherwise—that "Israel loved JFK."
Perhaps the average man in the street in Tel Aviv did indeed admire
John F. Kennedy. But Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, Mossad