15.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

534 The Continuing Cover-Up [437]<br />

goes deeper. Our Kennedy obsession obscures something crucial. He was,<br />

at best, a mediocre president or, less charitably, a lousy one." 1094<br />

Samuelson went on to blame Kennedy for the tragedy of the war in<br />

Vietnam. "It was Kennedy who made the critical commitment to Vietnam.<br />

All the subsequent speculation about whether he would or wouldn't have<br />

increased that commitment, as Johnson did, is really irrelevant. We can<br />

never know what Kennedy would have done, only what he did. And what<br />

he did was make a major military (and political) commitment to a country<br />

whose survival was not a vital national interest, and thereby, involves us in a<br />

conflict that politically we could not sustain. Once this happened, there<br />

was no easy exit. Bad judgment." 1095<br />

The opinionated columnist determined that JFK lacked "wisdom or<br />

good instincts" and that he did "not have the background or values to make<br />

good decisions by himself." 1096<br />

"The Kennedy who lives beyond the grave," concluded Samuelson,<br />

"commands neither my sympathy nor my interest. He is simplified,<br />

romanticized and exploited. He is not a person but a popular delusion." 1097<br />

So much for the memory of John F. Kennedy in the judgment of one of the<br />

nation's most respected opinion-makers. Perhaps, then, it should be no<br />

surprise that on November 22, 1994—the 31st anniversary of the JFK<br />

assassination—the Washington Post, America's political newspaper of<br />

record, said not a single word in commemoration of that tragic day.<br />

By November 22, 1997—four years after Samuelson's harsh attack on<br />

John Kennedy—the big "news" of the day was the release of The Dark Side<br />

of Camelot, Seymour Hersh's book about the JFK years (discussed earlier<br />

in these pages). Clearly, the new media thrust is to say that John F. Kennedy<br />

wasn't really such a great guy after all and that maybe, as Malcolm X said at<br />

the time of the JFK assassination, the chickens had come home to roost.<br />

ASKING FOR A DEBATE<br />

Just prior to the release of the third edition of <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong>, I sent<br />

copies of the second edition to a number of individuals inviting them to<br />

debate the thesis of <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> with me—on radio or in any public<br />

forum or in writing. I gave them the opportunity to refute the book in the<br />

manner they wished. Not an unfair offer, I should think.<br />

Here are those who received copies of <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> and the<br />

invitation to a debate:<br />

Jack Anderson - The syndicated columnist and international wheelerdealer<br />

who has promoted a number of conflicting theories about the JFK<br />

assassination, notably the myth that "Castro Killed JFK."<br />

Robert Dornan - Then a GOP congressman from Orange County,<br />

California and a shrieking devotee of Israel, Dornan later joined his arch foe,<br />

Rep. Loretta Sanchez, in co-hosting a September 19, 1998 fund-raiser to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!