Final_Judgment

[400] Final Judgment 497
Ewing cited the unusual "French connection" to the JFK assassination that
was under investigation when the House Committee closed up shop.
Final Judgment demonstrates the "French connection" is, in reality, the
Israeli connection. So surely Hersh was tuned in by Ewing to this "French
Connection." And in light of what Hersh clearly knew about JFK and Israel,
it's obvious he could not have helped but had some inkling of the Israeli
connection. Certainly, of course, Hersh knew that Israel had a motive.
According to Vanity Fair, Hersh dropped his own research into a book on
the JFK assassination and shifted his focus to JFK's personal
shenanigans. This apparently happened, after Final Judgment came out in
January of 1994 so it appears as if Final Judgment stole Hersh's thunder.
Hersh now says he never found any evidence that there was a conspiracy
behind the JFK assassination. All he can find evidence for is the fact that
JFK had a very interesting personal life and that JFK was supposedly
engaged in assassination plots against others. However, there are those who
dispute Hersh's "evidence" as even Time admitted.
Is Hersh's book his way of making amends for having exposed startling
never-before-known facts about JFK's secret war with Israel—evidence that
led to the writing of Final Judgment? And is the media's focus on Hersh's
credibility actually a subtle way of debunking Hersh's previous writing
about JFK and Israel—thereby indirectly discrediting Final Judgment?
Whatever the case, Hersh's new book is regurgitating ancient
allegations about Kennedy, putting them into circulation once again. That's
why those who were behind the assassination are thrilled to give Hersh's
book all the free publicity it's receiving.
MAKE YOUR OWN FINAL JUDGMENT
This has been an extended summary of my own personal reactions and
opinions regarding books about the JFK assassination. If you haven't read
the books that I've recommended, I suggest you do so. Once you've read all
of these books, I think you can make your own final judgment—and I don't
think you'll find that my own general conclusions are off base at all.
For those who are interesting in writing their own books on the JFK
assassination, I would urge them to avoid the distractions, the nonsensical
areas that bog down otherwise serious research. And don't try to write yet
another overview of the assassination conspiracy. That's what I did, but I
added a new angle that had never been considered before.
I think that in the pages of Final Judgment I've laid the groundwork for
extensive research in a number of new areas that are little-explored or have
otherwise never been explored. That's what I encourage people to do. Find
some new area of interest related to the JFK assassination and explore it in
every way possible. There's much more that can be done.