15.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

[398] <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> 495<br />

OAS plotters who were also conspiring against the life of French President<br />

Charles DeGaulle. Interesting indeed, to say the least.<br />

(2) Another mysterious death that Posner attempts to suggest was not<br />

so mysterious and probably un-connected in any way to the assassination is<br />

the death by electrocution of Thomas Eli Davis III. Posner says that Davis<br />

was a gun-runner who "also knew Ruby" and suggests that there is nothing<br />

to actually link him to the JFK conspiracy. Posner does not mention that<br />

Davis ran guns to the French OAS and had been picked up in North Africa<br />

just prior to the JFK assassination, at which time he was initially reported<br />

to have had on his person letters making reference to Lee Harvey Oswald.<br />

(It should be noted that it has since been established that the papers found<br />

on Davis were letters of introduction to Victor Oswald, an arms dealer based<br />

in Spain. Still, however, Posner is not telling the whole story.)<br />

POSNER'S BIGGEST FRAUD<br />

Perhaps Posner's most egregious assault on his readers, actively aided<br />

and abetted by his Establishment media promoters, is his claim to have<br />

solved the JFK mystery through the presumably indisputable magic of<br />

computers. In his book Posner relies heavily on a computer-generated<br />

analysis of the JFK assassination by a company known as Failure Analysis<br />

Associates, which "proves" that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.<br />

Posner essentially leaves his readers to believe that the computer<br />

analysis was somehow prepared exclusively for his use, when, in fact, it<br />

was prepared for a mock trial of Lee Harvey Oswald conducted by the<br />

American Bar Association (which, incidentally, ended in a hung jury).<br />

What's more, Posner also fails to tell his readers that the computer<br />

company also prepared an alternative computer-generated analysis of the<br />

assassination which provided a completely different alternative thesis: that<br />

there could have been more than one assassin involved in the murder of<br />

President Kennedy. So the primary selling point of Posner's book—the<br />

famous computer analysis of the assassination—that the media gave such<br />

coverage is itself based upon distortions of the truth as they appeared in the<br />

pages of Posner's book.<br />

There's one other interesting item worth reiterating. As I pointed out<br />

earlier in <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong>, one of Posner's collaborators, Johann Rush, who<br />

provided Posner an "enhanced" version of the famous Zapruder film of the<br />

assassination, also just happens to be the same Johann Rush who was one<br />

of the cameramen for WDSU television in New Orleans (owned by the<br />

ADL- and Clay Shaw-linked Stern family) that always seemed to be on hand<br />

when Lee Harvey Oswald was making "pro-Castro" pronouncements. Rush<br />

is always "on assignment," it seems.<br />

So much for Gerald Posner. No one really takes his book seriously, not<br />

even, I suppose, his sponsors behind the scenes. They do know who killed<br />

JFK, but they don't want you to know and that's why they have people like<br />

Posner ready to pull out of a hat.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!