15.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

[390] <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> 487<br />

patriotic intelligence operative who stumbled across a plot to kill JFK and<br />

sought to expose the plot. Quite an interesting book.<br />

Dr. Charles Crenshaw's JFK: Conspiracy of Silence presents a firsthand<br />

account of what the doctor saw in the emergency room in Dallas and<br />

shows the "official" JFK autopsy reports to be garbage. Crenshaw took a lot<br />

of heat for daring to come forth with his knowledge and he deserves quite a<br />

bit of credit for having done so.<br />

WAS IT REALLY A 'MORTAL ERROR'?<br />

Another book that I must mention (because I have been asked about the<br />

book on more than one occasion) is Mortal Error by Bonar Menninger. This<br />

book contends that the fatal shot that killed the president was accidentally<br />

fired by a Secret Service agent in the follow-up car behind the JFK<br />

limousine. I have read the book and I will say right up front that it is not<br />

akin to the outlandish, nonsensical story (believed with religious fervor by<br />

some) that JFK was killed (deliberately) by a shot fired by his Secret Service<br />

chauffeur. Instead, Menninger's book is well-written and thoroughlyresearched.<br />

Anyone who read the book (and who had absolutely no other<br />

knowledge about the JFK assassination whatsoever) might conclude that<br />

this was indeed the "final judgment."<br />

The thesis of the book is that somebody (probably Lee Harvey Oswald)<br />

was firing at JFK with criminal intent from the Texas School Book<br />

Depository, but that a Secret Service agent's weapon went off and finished<br />

the incompetent Oswald's job.<br />

There is at least one problem with this thesis: it's not likely that<br />

Oswald fired a gun in Dealey Plaza that day and there is also legitimate<br />

debate as to whether any shots were actually fired from the window where<br />

Oswald allegedly fired. But if, per little chance, the thesis was right, it<br />

doesn't essentially conflict with the overall general thesis of <strong>Final</strong><br />

<strong>Judgment</strong>, inasmuch as <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> does contend that Oswald was in the<br />

midst of circles within circles who were conspiring against the president and<br />

trying to frame Oswald to make it appear as if he did fire from the book<br />

depository. If indeed a shot was accidentally fired at JFK by the Secret<br />

Service, it doesn't remove the fact that shot was fired in response to an<br />

assassination attempt from elsewhere.<br />

With all of this said, I have to suggest that no matter how sincere the<br />

authors of the volume, the book is a wild distraction for serious students of<br />

the JFK conspiracy. It's quite an inventive theory, but I don't think it has<br />

much credibility, to be perfectly honest.<br />

There's one more volume that I should mention. That is Kill Zone by<br />

Craig Roberts. Although the book is a standard recounting of the basic facts<br />

about the broad-ranging nature of the conspiracy against JFK, touching on<br />

the standard players such as the CIA and the Mafia and even gets into the socalled<br />

"French" connection (without going so far as to make the definite<br />

Israeli linkage), the book is interesting and refreshing in that the author is<br />

not fearful of bringing up the possibility that there were high-level

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!