15.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

482 The Battle of the Books [385]<br />

[385]<br />

AN OVERVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE<br />

Accessories After the Fact by Sylvia Meagher is, in some ways, a<br />

supplement to Rush to <strong>Judgment</strong>. This is a highly detailed examination of<br />

the Warren Report that is a valuable exposition of all the flaws in the case<br />

against Lee Harvey Oswald. This book will interest those who are fascinated<br />

by ballistics, autopsy evidence, etc.<br />

Six Seconds in Dallas by Josiah Thompson is a real tour de force. This<br />

book is a fantastic analysis of the Zapruder film. Profusely illustrated, this<br />

volume establishes that there were several assassins in Dealey Plaza beyond<br />

any question and that the official autopsy evidence doesn't jibe with the<br />

truth. This is a classic book. Those interested in the photographic evidence<br />

should refer to Robert Groden's The Killing of a President.<br />

James Fetzer's Assassination Science is the latest look at the scientific<br />

evidence. (Fetzer by the way, refuses to acknowledge he knows anything<br />

about <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> although I sent him a copy and wrote him twice!)<br />

In the area of books that consider the JFK assassination from a larger<br />

overview, Crossfire, by Jim Marrs is probably the best. This book is flawed<br />

largely because Marrs presents multiple theories, one on top of the other,<br />

and does not really reach any firm conclusions. Those who think that they<br />

will find the solution to the assassination in the book, more than likely,<br />

will find themselves overwhelmed by the multiple theories.<br />

Marrs never firmly establishes in the reader's mind that there can be<br />

multiple interests working together to achieve the same goal. He seems to<br />

treat the assassination in the context that either A did it or B did it or C did<br />

it, never really suggesting a combination of elements were responsible.<br />

Who Shot JFK? by Bob Callahan is an easy to read guide, broken down<br />

into many interesting sidebars and delightfully illustrated with wonderful<br />

cartoons that present a satirical touch to a very ponderous subject.<br />

Conspiracy by Anthony Summers is an interesting treatment of the<br />

JFK controversy up to and including the House Assassinations Committee<br />

investigation in the late 1970's. My primary complaint against Summers is<br />

that in his revised edition he fails to acknowledge the information that he<br />

was provided by Gary Wean, the former Los Angeles detective who knew<br />

about the Mickey Cohen-Israeli connection to JFK's famous affair with<br />

Marilyn Monroe (and which I, of course, examine in <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong>).<br />

Now Summers himself had also written a book on the life of Marilyn<br />

Monroe (where he does mention Wean) but he leaves the reader with the idea<br />

that the Kennedy family had a hand in her death, whether by accident or by<br />

murder. Be that as it may, Summers' book is quite interesting. In his<br />

revised edition Summers also falls flat by failing to give the French<br />

Connection, which he mentions, the analysis it is certainly due.<br />

Reasonable Doubt by Henry Hurt is another good overview. It has its<br />

flaws but nothing substantial. It's probably worthwhile reading for serious<br />

researchers. Likewise with Robert Sam Anson's They've Killed the<br />

President which is an interesting book. But I hasten to add that I find<br />

Anson's attack on Jim Garrison off the mark and reprehensible.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!