Final_Judgment

405 Photo Section
Robert Welch (left), founder of the pro-Israel
John Birch Society, played a major part in
directing conservative attention away from a
possible role by the CIA in the JFK assassination
and in the direction of the KGB, promoting
the propaganda line of the CIA’s
Mossad liaison, James J. Angleton. One
American conservative, Morris Bealle, figured
out Welch’s game early on. In the June 19,
1965 edition of his Capsule News, Bealle
reported that Welch had declared Bealle’s
book, The Guns of the Regressive Right—
which pointed a finger in the direction of the
CIA—“all wrong” and told his Birch followers
that it was not the CIA but Lyndon Johnson
behind the JFK assassination. According to
Bealle, “We examined thoroughly all of his
1964 bulletins . . . [which] were filled with
attacks on Earl Warren and curious expressions
of hearty agreement with him on the
myth that “a Communist (meaning the Decoy
Man Oswald) killed Kennedy.” As recently as
Nov. 21, 1988, the Birch Society’s New
American magazine favorably touted the
Warren Commission Report, saying that “evidence
demonstrates beyond a reasonable
doubt” that Lee Harvey Oswald—one lone
communist nut—killed JFK.
Several JFK writers have noted that the media empire of S.I. Newhouse (left), a major
power in the Israeli lobby, has played a key role in suppressing evidence of conspiracy in
the JFK affair. It’s probably no coincidence that Newhouse’s lifelong friend, mob attorney
Roy Cohn (right)—who used his clout to influence Newhouse publications—was a foe of
the Kennedy family and linked to the Mossad’s Permindex operation that played a central role
in the JFK conspiracy. A small-town Newhouse weekly once published an item about Final
Judgment, but the editor deleted material referring to the book’s thesis, clumsily
substituting stilted verbiage saying the book “addresses charges relating to the JFK assassination.”
Michael Collins Piper remarks: “This may be the first time in history a newspaper
story about a book on the JFK assassination didn’t even mention the book’s thesis.”