Final_Judgment

Photo Section 390
After E. Howard Hunt (inexplicably) sued The Spotlight for libel for exposing the CIA’s plot
to frame him in the JFK assassination, famed JFK investigator, attorney Mark Lane (left),
served as The Spotlight’s defense counsel and scuttled Hunt’s case. Testimony by former CIA
operative Marita Lorenz (right) revealed that Hunt had met in Dallas the day before the JFK
assassination with CIA-Mossad asset Frank Sturgis and a team of anti-Castro Cubans, but
also Lansky-Bronfman henchman Jack Ruby. Some years later, a Mossad- and CIA-connected
intelligence asset, Andrew Allen, orchestrated another lawsuit against The Spotlight
forcing the newspaper into bankruptcy, giving federal Judge S. Martin Teel, the opportunity to
shut down the publication in 2001. It’s no coincidence that Teel had been implicated in covering
up the infamous INSLAW scandal (first exposed by The Spotlight) which involved the
theft by Justice Department officials of surveillance software which was then turned over to
the Mossad, as revealed byGordon Thomas in his book Robert Maxwell: Israel’s Super-Spy.
Veteran CIA asset William R. Corson (left), a longtime media
“cutout” for the Mossad’s CIA liaison, James Angleton, leaked
the “Hunt in Dallas” story that embroiled The Spotlight in the
Hunt lawsuit. Later, after Corson’s death, one of Corson’s associates
carried on his work, energetically scheming behind the
scenes to discredit Mark Lane and Michael Collins Piper and to
stop distribution of Final Judgment. The “black operation”
against Lane and Piper involved distribution of disinformation
documents (ostensibly from CIA files) purporting to “admit”
CIA and Israeli involvement in the JFK affair. The phony documents
were released with the expectation that they would be
easily discredited, as indeed they were. Now the CIA and the
Israelis proclaim: “The theory of CIA and/or Israel collaborated
in the JFK assassination was based on fraudulent documents,
so the work of both Lane and Piper is therefore discredited.”
However, what the critics do not mention is this: neither
Lane nor Piper relied on those obviously forged documents.