15.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

340 They Dare Not Speak Out [279]<br />

member of the CIA-funded Citizens Committee for a Free Cuba and the cofounder<br />

of the Citizens Committee for Peace With Freedom in Vietnam. 752<br />

It might be added, in passing, that AIM has consistently also been a<br />

strident defender of Israel and its interests. To even hint at any conspiracy<br />

which might involve Israel and its allies in the CIA would be an outrage,<br />

insofar as AIM would be concerned. So much, then, for accuracy in media<br />

from Accuracy in Media.<br />

OLIVER STONE<br />

What about Oliver Stone's JFK? Where does this controversial film fit<br />

in the lore of JFK assassination conspiracy theories? What of the media's<br />

hysterical response to the film (which actually brought it greater publicity)?<br />

Writing in the New York Times on December 20, 1991, Stone asked a<br />

rather simple question: "When a leader of any country is assassinated, the<br />

media normally ask: 'What political forces were opposed to this leader and<br />

would benefit from his assassination?"<br />

The irony, as we shall see, is that although Oliver Stone himself<br />

seemed to have asked that very question in a big, big way—through the aegis<br />

of his controversial film JFK—the fact is that Stone himself has, in a<br />

sense, proven in the end to have become a major factor in the continuing<br />

cover-up of the real truth about the assassination of John F. Kennedy.<br />

It is ironic indeed that although Stone's film JFK has focused<br />

widespread international attention on the JFK assassination conspiracy, there<br />

has been quiet speculation that the media's furor might be part of a highlevel<br />

plan to further cover up the truth about the conspiracy.<br />

Many JFK assassination researchers, Mark Lane in particular, are deeply<br />

concerned that Stone's film presents a strange mixture of both fact and<br />

fiction. The facts about the assassination conspiracy are sensational enough<br />

without fictional details being added, he and others have pointed out. Lane<br />

summarized it best: "It was good that Stone called the attention of<br />

teenagers and others to the unsolved murder. It was bad that he did so by<br />

falsifying the record." 753<br />

POINTING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION<br />

Although Stone's film referenced, in passing, the CIA connections of<br />

David Ferrie and Clay Shaw—and actually mentioned Permindex—the film's<br />

primary thrust was that the conspiracy originated in the so-called "militaryindustrial"<br />

complex.<br />

The primary conspirators were presented as high-level military men and<br />

their allies among the multi-billion-dollar defense contracting companies.<br />

The intelligence community's role was understated, to say the very least.<br />

This, in itself, lead some of Stone's critics to suggest that perhaps the<br />

ultimate purpose behind the film was not, in fact, to pinpoint those truly<br />

responsible for the JFK assassination, but to point the finger in another

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!