Final_Judgment

But Garrison himself evidently concluded (quite correctly, I might add)
that it was not in his interests to say so—at least not publicly and certainly
not in any of his non-fiction writings on the subject. So Garrison decided
instead to put his thesis in a novel, but it was a novel that obviously was
never published. I doubt that Garrison's family will be attempting to put the
unpublished manuscript (if it still exists) on the market any time soon.
Weberman's revelation is sure to make many defenders of Jim Garrison
uncomfortable, but it does provide astounding confirmation that the thesis
that has been put forth in Final Judgment does have some genuine support
from a figure who has become both a villain and an icon in the lore of the
JFK assassination conspiracy.
Garrison's reported theorizing of Mossad involvement does not, of
course, prove that the Mossad was involved in the JFK assassination, but it
does lend credence to what has been so widely criticized (but without
refutation, I might add) in the pages of Final Judgment.
The question, naturally, arises: was Weberman lying about Garrison's
Mossad theory, and if so, why would Weberman make this allegation? This
is not for me to answer. I am only here to tell you that this is what
Weberman has said.
If Weberman is not lying, are we then to believe that Garrison was
simply having some sort of twisted fun, that he concocted this scenario for
his own peculiar purposes? This, of course, seems highly unlikely.
Thus we are left with the fact of what Weberman has alleged about
Garrison's apparent suppositions, coupled with the reality that Final
Judgment has now come forth documenting the "how" and the "why" of
Mossad involvement in the JFK assassination conspiracy.
And as much as it may dismay Israel and its powerful lobby in
America, represented by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai
B'rith and other powerful forces, there are a lot of people—in growing
numbers—who do believe that Final Judgment presents a scenario that does
make sense, one that makes as much sense or more than many of the other
standard theories on the subject, the ADL's hysterical efforts to silence me
(but not refute me) notwithstanding.
So despite the subtitle of my book, in a sense I actually initially missed
"the missing link in the JFK assassination conspiracy"—the fact that Jim
Garrison had indeed recognized the Mossad connection.
Only now am I finally able to bring this vital detail to my readers. I
only wish I had done it earlier.
Keeping all of this in mind, I invite the readers of Final Judgment to
read what I have written, and re-written, and revised and up-dated and to
determine for themselves if Jim Garrison's apparent suspicions were indeed
on the mark and that Israel and its Mossad were primary players alongside
the CIA in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
—Michael Collins Piper
Washington, DC